Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

A potential Netflix purchase of Warner Bros. streaming and studio assets is causing headaches for investors, per Morgan Stanley

On the surface, it’s easy to see why Netflix would be interested in bidding for Warner Bros. Discovery’s studio and streaming assets: the opportunity to add iconic franchises like DC Comics, Harry Potter, and “The Lord of the Rings, as well as legions of HBO original shows that have stood the test of time.

However, the introduction of all this content, much of which has traditionally generated revenue in ways that Netflix does not, might be adding too many tentacles for even the creator of Squid Games to effectively manage, per Morgan Stanley, which also notes that it’s questionable if regulators would agree to such a tie-up.

“While Netflix is the largest of the reported bidders by a factor, it may have the smallest synergy opportunity and perhaps the toughest regulatory path,” analyst Benjamin Swinburne wrote. “NFLX shares have been under pressure over concerns that a WB acquisition, if announced, would complicate the investment thesis, distract management, and/or dilute EPS.”

The other interested parties are Paramount Skydance and Comcast, per reports.

In short, a successful Netflix acquisition may see the streaming giant need to be able to raise prices and/or subscribers to make enough money from the acquired properties under its distribution umbrella as it veers away from how these assets have made bank, oftentimes through theaters and third-party distribution.

This introduces many “strategic questions,” as Swinburne wrote:

“If acquired, Netflix could choose to shift all theatrical distribution at Warner Bros. to direct release on Netflix, believing that it can generate more value by keeping these films exclusive to Netflix rather than monetizing in other windows — including theatrical. Over time, it could similarly exit the third-party licensing business and distribute all TV series produced by Warner Bros. studios on its own platform.

Such a transition would take time, as TV distribution is built on run-of-series agreements and multi-year licensing deals and talent relationships would likely require some in-production films to still see theatrical distribution. Long-term, however, this kind of business model pivot would put downward pressure on the earnings power of the acquired businesses, which would need to be recouped through faster growth at core Netflix to justify the acquisition price, if a deal were to be announced.

If Netflix were to announce a bid for WB, HBO could bring some similar strategic questions for Netflix. For example, Netflix could shut the service down and shift all content, both originals and licensed, onto Netflix. That would be walking away from nearly $2bn of adj. EBITDA, but Netflix may feel the content can be better monetized on core Netflix.”

Congressman Darrell Issa has written to the attorney general expressing antitrust concerns over the potential for Netflix to purchase Warner Bros. studio and streaming properties, writing that it “currently wields unequaled market power,” adding that these assets would “further enhance this position” to a level “traditionally viewed as presumptively problematic under antitrust law.”

More Markets

See all Markets
Dickens, Great Expectations, He said, Aha! would you?

Tech tumbles as momentum stocks run into a blowout jobs report and a wave of profit-taking

The AI trade is under some pressure, taking prices back like... a few days. President Donald Trump is not a fan of the price action.

Trump Administration Considers Reclassifying Marijuana As A Less Dangerous Drug

Trulieve to list on NYSE, a first for US cannabis sector

More may be on the way: several other US cannabis companies have announced reverse stock splits with the intention of listing on a major exchange.

markets

Lululemon’s stretch getting tested: Stock plunges after after outlook is cut

Lululemon shares are down double digits in premarket trading after the company cut its full-year sales and profit outlook, overshadowing a Q1 beat and raising fresh concerns about the brand’s turnaround efforts.

The company now expects fiscal 2026 revenue to be flat to down 1%, compared with its prior forecast for 2% to 4% growth. Guidance for full-year diluted earnings per share was dragged down to a range of $10.95 to $11.15, below the company’s previous guidance of $12.10 to $12.30 and well below Wall Street’s estimate of $13.26.

Key numbers for Q1:

  • EPS of $1.69 vs. the $1.68 expected.

  • Revenue of $2.47 billion vs. the $2.43 billion expected.

The modest top-line beat masked a widening divergence between Lululemons geographic markets. While international revenue rose 22% overall with a 30% increase in Mainland China, the bigger problem remains North America, where revenue fell 5%.

Interim co-CEO and CFO Meghan Frank acknowledged during the earnings call that recent product rollouts underperformed. A highly anticipated yoga campaign failed to generate its expected halo effect across broader product lines.

Profitability metrics took a major hit, with gross margins contracting by 410 basis points to 54.2% due to mounting tariff costs and promotional markdowns. Operating income consequently fell 37% year over year to $276.9 million.

“We experienced spikes of negative commentary in the media and on social channels with regard to our brand, which had an impact on traffic and overall top-line performance,” Frank said during the earnings call. “And second, not all of our product launches have met our expectations. While we have had several successful launches so far this year, we have seen others as we start Q2 not generate the anticipated guest response.”

Lululemons valuation has already been steadily compressing for years. While it was once one of retails richly valued stocks, investors have been questioning whether the company can return to the double-digit growth era.

The results also arrive during a leadership transition. Lululemon announced back in April that former Nike executive Heidi ONeill is set to take over as CEO in September, with investors looking to her to revive growth in North America and restore the brands growth.

As Lululemon faces both macroeconomic pressure and brand-specific challenges, its stock has dropped around 40% year to date.

markets

US job growth skyrocketed in May, blasting past expectations

The US economy added 172,000 jobs in the month of May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday, sending 10-year Treasury yields higher.

The strong May job market surprised economists. Experts had predicted only 85,000 new jobs — just half the reported number. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, as expected.

The job growth story is a hopeful spot for the economy as consumers continue to feel inflationary pressure from the Iran war.

Job gains were buoyed by the leisure and hospitality sector, which added 70,000 jobs, as well as local government, healthcare, and education.

Both the March and April jobs reports were revised upward, making them collectively 93,000 higher than previously reported.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.