World
Big spenders: Splashing cash is usually a good strategy

Big spenders: Splashing cash is usually a good strategy

The winners' circle

The same question often emerges in the lead-up to an election: does spending more money actually equal more votes?

An exhaustive analysis is probably best left to political pundits or prospective PhD students, but even a simple examination of the 2020 House elections from OpenSecrets reveals that, among the 434 House seats contested, a mere 52 saw victory for the candidate with leaner campaign expenses. Indeed, in the last 4 cycles, House candidates who spent more money went to win their races 91% of the time.

Hey big spenders

Party leaders and top deputies generally spent the heftiest sums, often transferring large portions to party coffers — and in some cases lead to some lopsided contests.

While Republican chief whip and current Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy beat Democrat Kim Mangone to California’s 23rd District, he did so at the expense of $23.2m — some $21.6m more than his opponent. Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi, the twice-serving House speaker who preceded McCarthy, forked out nearly $19m more in the congressional race than runner-up Shahid Buttar — a self-described “constitutional lawyer, artist, writer, DJ & MC” — who spent just $1.6m on his campaign.

At least in 2020, more profligate politicians had the upper hand — even high profile candidates splashed masses of cash to get elected. Despite Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (or AOC) being the member of congress (or MOC) with the most Twitter followers, the youngest woman to serve in congress still spent some $5.2m more than her rival during her $16m campaign. And, notwithstanding a controversial court case just a year later, provocative representative Matt Gaetz claimed victory with a $4.4m campaign, spending some $2.5m more than his contender — a similar margin to that which saw Greg Pence win his race by, brother to another well-known Indiana legislator, who spent $2.7m in total.

Even so, being a familiar face paid dividends at the polls. Don Young, the Alaskan politician who was the longest-serving Republican in congressional history before he passed away in 2022, won the 2020 election while spending $3.3m less than his opponent. When you’ve been in congress for 49 years, you can maybe cut back on a few TV ads. It’s 85 year-old Maxine Waters, though, who most efficiently reaped ballots on a (relative) budget: serving California since 1991, Waters dished out ~$7.9m less than her opponent in 2020 to keep her well-worn seat.

Clearly, having deep pockets can only take you so far — Mike Bloomberg poured more than $1 billion into his primary campaign — but it certainly won't hurt your chances.

More World

See all World
world
Tom Jones

The most watched soccer match in US history got less than a third of the views the Super Bowl did

Between a top-spot finish in the group stage, a sweeping performance against Bosnia and Herzegovina in the round of 32, and the president’s controversial intervention, Monday evening’s USMNT game against Belgium had, to put it lightly, shaped up into a box-office clash.

And though the US players’ performance on the pitch might not have lived up to the high drama off it, American soccer fans certainly showed up. According to early estimates, the 4-1 defeat against Belgium was the most watched soccer telecast in US history, hauling some 40 million viewers on average across the coverage on Fox and Telemundo.

That may be a record tally in the US for the sport that much of the world calls some variant of “football” — besting the 36.2 million who tuned in to watch the team’s previous knock-out match — but it’s still peanuts in comparison to the sport that shares the same name in the States.

World cup viewers chart
Sherwood News
Reddit alien stock exchange

Reddit’s advertising business is getting bigger. It’s already booming.

The platform will plow more money into its ad offerings as it cements itself as a “trove of human intelligence.”

Tom Jones6/22/26

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.