Business

DiscountDreams

Another day, another dollar

Inside a Dollar Tree store, where a price tag shows $1.25.
Dollar Tree has benefited from raising its baseline price from $1 to $1.25. (Liao Pan/Getty Images)

Dollar Tree wants a richer, “$125k” customer, so Family Dollar has to go

For more than 30 years, Dollar Tree sold nearly everything in its stores for $1. Then the upsell started.

Discount retailer Dollar Tree said last month that it would look into selling its Family Dollar line of stores. On its face, that might just seem like a reversal of a terrible business decision — the company spent $9 billion to buy Family Dollar in 2015, outbidding its key rival, Dollar General. It certainly won’t recoup that amount in a sale.

A deeper look, though, shows that selling the stores would be yet another way Dollar Tree is continually pushing to target consumers who have more money in their pockets in an era when inflation continues to squeeze consumers, especially low-income shoppers. 

Dollar Tree-branded stores typically sit in the suburbs and cater to middle-class consumers who are on the lookout for deals and want to buy party supplies, toys, crafts, and other discretionary items. On a recent earnings call, the company said that in 2023, the Dollar Tree chain added 3.4 million new customers “mostly from households earning over $125,000 a year.” 

Family Dollar stores, on the other hand, are usually in urban areas and sell more of the essentials at multiple price points. In recent earnings calls, the company cited last year’s reduction in SNAP benefits as a headwind for the chain.

“The go-to-market strategies for both brands are totally different,” Dollar Tree CEO Richard Dreiling said on an earnings call in November. One is “the thrill of the treasure hunt,” he said, referring to Dollar Tree. Family Dollar, meanwhile, “is traditional consumable retailing where there’s an expectation of what has to be in that store, and has got to be there every time I come in to get it.”

Family Dollar struggled with its operations for years before it was bought out, and Dollar Tree has had a tough time trying to fix those issues. Case in point: the chain was fined more than $40 million by the Justice Department this year for distributing products from a rat-infested warehouse.

While they are both dollar stores, the two brands have little synergy when it comes to purchasing power because they sell different products. Even as profits have gone up for Dollar Tree-branded stores, the company as a whole hasn’t widened its margins much since the merger, a sign Family Dollar may be weighing the company down. 

“They’ve tried things, and there are some inherent cultural issues with the Family Dollar business, [and] the Dollar Tree guys since 2015 have not been able to crack the nut and turn it around,” Telsey Advisory Group analyst Joe Feldman said.

Telsey estimated that Family Dollar would likely sell for between $3.5 billion and $7.5 billion, compared to the $9 billion that Dollar Tree paid for it in 2015. Even at that price, Wall Street seems to think selling Family Dollar would be a good idea, rather than continuing to put good money after bad. Last month, UBS estimated that if the company were able to jettison the Family Dollar brand, the Dollar Tree chain by itself would be worth $160 a share, much higher than the $107.25 per share the company closed at on Monday. 

A 25% price increase across the board

For more than 30 years, Dollar Tree sold nearly everything in its self-branded stores for $1. Then the upsell started. In 2019, Dollar Tree started exploring selling items for $3 or $5. Two years later, it raised its baseline price to $1.25, which sounds small until you consider: what other companies have been able to raise prices across the board by 25% in one fell swoop? 

Earlier this year, Dollar Tree said it would raise its maximum price for an item to $7. It’s part of a strategy the company calls “multi-price,” which it is clearly banking on to turn its stock-price performance around. There were 41 mentions of “multi-price” on the company’s earnings call last month.

While it keeps steering shoppers toward higher price tags, the company is also shifting its mix of stores toward higher-income shoppers. It has closed hundreds of Family Dollar stores already, and now it’s looking at selling the chain altogether. Meanwhile, the company just struck a deal to buy 170 stores from 99 Cents Only Stores out of bankruptcy, the vast majority of them in California. 

Why close stores you already own and pay more money to buy new ones? It’s simple: “The acquisition in California, to be very frank, is going to generate returns above our average in the overall chain,” Dreiling said during the company’s earnings call on Wednesday. He added that the deal would help attract a “higher-income consumer.”

More Business

See all Business
business

Danone acquires meal replacement shake maker Huel for ~$1.2 billion

Very big things are happening today in the world of nutritionally complete products that taste like chalk, as Danone has agreed to buy the celebrity-backed protein bar, powder, meal, and meal replacement shake maker Huel for €1 billion, or around $1.2 billion.

In a statement announcing the acquisition, Danone — apparently the No. 1 yogurt producer in the US and the nation’s top plant-based food and beverage company as well — said that buying Huel will enhance its “presence in functional nutrition and extend its portfolio into the fast-growing Complete Nutrition space.” Danone, the parent company behind Evian and Actimel, also praised Huel’s “best-in-class digital execution” and fan bases across the UK, Europe, and the US.

Bulking season

Huel, a portmanteau of “human” and “fuel,” was only set up just over a decade ago, but thanks to its marketing efforts, a buzzy product range that marries on-the-go eating with nutrient-dense, plant-based ingredients, and a decent list of (mostly UK-based) celebrity investors, like actor Idris Elba and talk show host Jonathan Ross, sales have soared.

business

China’s EV startup trio have all become profitable

China’s EV startup trio, Nio, Li Auto, and XPeng, are now all profitable, following the latter’s Q4 results released Friday.

XPeng reported a quarterly net profit of about $55 million, compared to rival Nio’s Q4 net profit (also its first) of about $40 million. Li Auto posted Q4 net profit of less than $1 million.

All three companies being profitable offers a stark contrast to the EV market in the US, where Rivian quietly delayed its 2027 profitability target in a filing about its Uber robotaxi partnership yesterday. Lucid is likely further away, and last month cut 12% of its US workforce as part of its “path toward profitability.”

Still, it’s not all rosy for China’s EV startups, either. XPeng ADRs were down more than 6% in Friday morning trading as its Q1 sales forecast came in below estimates. As China rolls back subsidies, auto sales are slumping. Chinese retail EV and hybrid sales fell 32% in February from the same month last year.

9.3%

As the war with Iran produces the biggest spike in US gas prices since Hurricane Katrina, car retailer CarMax is continuing to see heightened interest in EVs, hybrids, and plug-in hybrids.

“From Feb 1st - March 1st (inclusive), compared to March 2nd to March 15th (inclusive), we saw a 9.3% lift in page views for these vehicles,” a spokesperson for the company told Sherwood News.

As industry insiders recently told us, EV interest climbs when gas prices rise. That appears to be holding true even without EV tax credits, which the Trump administration ended under its new budget package.

CarMax also saw EV searches spike in 2022, amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the resulting oil price spike.

Walt Disney Chairman And CEO Bob Iger Rings Opening Bell At NY Stock Exchange

It’s the end of Disney’s Iger era (again)

Incoming CEO Josh D’Amaro is replacing Bob Iger on Wednesday, though Iger will remain a senior adviser through the end of the year.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.