Business
President Biden Speaks At The Intel Ocotillo Campus In Arizona
Intel CEO Patrick Gelsinger in Chandler, Arizona (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

Even an $8.5 billion government windfall couldn’t save Intel

Intel may have landed a big government contract, but investors are growing tired of waiting for results.

Over the last 20 years or so, Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) has become the global leader in chip manufacturing, now controlling roughly 60% of the semiconductor foundry market. Foundries are 3rd-party chip manufacturers. Companies like AMD, Nvidia, and Apple design their chips in the US, but they rely on TSMC to manufacture their most-advanced semiconductors in its foundries in Taiwan. The reason for this is two-fold:

  1. Chip manufacturing is a capital–intensive business, and many companies prefer to outsource this process vs. scaling their own production.

  2. TSMC has the world’s most advanced manufacturing capabilities, currently producing 3-nanometer (nm) chips. (For context, Intel’s most-advanced mass-production chip is still 7nm).

The problem with TSMC dominating the chip manufacturing industry is that it presents heightened geopolitical risks for the US. TSMC is, as the name suggests, located in Taiwan. China’s ongoing conflict with Taiwan risks supply chain disruptions that could have ripple effects in the US economy, as most of our most-advanced chips are manufactured in Taiwan. 

On March 20, 2024, to address the risk of outsourcing manufacturing of our most advanced chips to Taiwan, the US government committed up to $8.5 billion (along with $11 billion in loans) to Intel, through the CHIPS and Science Act to support construction and expansion of Intel facilities in Arizona, Ohio, New Mexico, and Oregon.

The goal with the investment was to expand US domestic chip-manufacturing capabilities, not just for Intel, but for the broader chip market. The US government wants a competitive foundry on its home turf. Last summer, Intel separated its “foundry” business’s financials from the rest of the company, making it an independent operating unit, and at the IFS Direct Connect Conference in February 2024, Intel’s CEO Pat Gelsinger noted that he wanted Intel’s foundry business to eventually produce chips for Nvidia, Qualcomm, Google, Microsoft, and even AMD. 

So, how is Intel’s foundry business doing with that additional $8.5 billion in funding?

Not great!

Intel reported lackluster earnings last week, with a 1% decline in year-over-year revenue and a $1.61 billion operating loss, including a $2.8 billion loss stemming from its Foundry unit that generated $4.3 billion in revenue (4% year over year growth). Even worse, the company stated that it was slashing 17,500 jobs and suspending its dividend just five months after announcing that the CHIPS Act funding would create almost 30,000 jobs.

Management noted that investments in Intel Foundry would continue weighing on operating profits through 2024, but the business would reach breakeven soon-after. However, investors have grown tired of Intel’s pattern of missed deadlines, especially after the company already pushed back the initial timeline for its new Ohio factory from 2025 to late 2026 amid “market challenges,” and the stock fell by 29% on Friday morning, in its biggest decline since 1974.

Maybe Intel’s heavy spending will pay off, but for now, investors certainly aren’t pleased. Plus, it’s never a good sign when your CEO’s response to the sharpest stock sell off in decades is quoting Old Testament Proverbs:

More Business

See all Business
business

Paramount+ wants to look a lot more like TikTok, leaked documents reveal

Larry Ellison’s Oracle just took a 15% stake in TikTok’s US arm. David Ellison’s Paramount streaming service could soon look a lot more like it.

According to leaked documents seen by Business Insider, Paramount+ is planning a big push into short-form, user-generated video in the vein of the addictive feeds of TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts.

Per Business Insider, the documents reveal that short-form videos are a top priority for the streamer in the first quarter of 2026, and executives are working on adding a personalize feed of clips to the mobile app.

The move would follow similar mobile-centric plans from Disney, which earlier this month announced that it would bring vertical video to Disney+ this year, and Netflix, which during its earnings call said it would revamp its mobile app toward vertical video feeds and expand its short-form video features.

Streamers are increasingly competing for user attention with popular apps. YouTube is regularly the most popular streaming service by time spent.

Per Business Insider, the documents reveal that short-form videos are a top priority for the streamer in the first quarter of 2026, and executives are working on adding a personalize feed of clips to the mobile app.

The move would follow similar mobile-centric plans from Disney, which earlier this month announced that it would bring vertical video to Disney+ this year, and Netflix, which during its earnings call said it would revamp its mobile app toward vertical video feeds and expand its short-form video features.

Streamers are increasingly competing for user attention with popular apps. YouTube is regularly the most popular streaming service by time spent.

The Memorial Tournament presented by Workday - Previews

Starbucks’ CEO, Brian Niccol, made $30.9 million in 2025

That includes $997,392 in expenses related to his use of the company’s private jet.

Barnes & Noble Store

Bolstered bookseller Barnes & Noble is planning a major expansion and potential IPO

One of the hottest IPOs of the year could be a century-old bookstore that Amazon almost killed.

Nathan's Famous restaurant on Coney Island

Iconic hot dog brand Nathan’s Famous just sold for $450 million

Packaged meat company Smithfield Foods has agreed to acquire the historic Coney Island staple — best known for its annual hot dog eating contest — in an all-cash deal.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.