Business
US-HEALTH-VAPING-JUUL
Juul Labs Inc. vaping e-cigarettes (Patrick T. Fallon/Getty Images)
Weird Money

Four-figure Juul settlements are the hot new social-media trend

As part of a $200 million+ settlement, Juul has been Venmoing former customers thousands of dollars.

Jack Raines

While researching (read: scrolling through X mindlessly) yesterday, I came across some interesting screenshots showing that folks were receiving four-figure Venmo payments from “Juul Labs, Inc. Settlement Administrator.”

A class-action lawsuit was filed against Juul and tobacco company Altria, which bought 35% of Juul Labs for $12.8 billion in 2018, with the plaintiffs alleging that Altria and Juul had led consumers to overpay for Juul products by misleading them about the products’ addictiveness and safety, and that Juul products were unlawfully marketed to minors.

In 2022, Juul agreed to a $245 million settlement, and earlier in 2024, Altria agreed to a $45 million settlement. After fees and taxes, this worked out to $201.9 million being paid out to verified claimants, and on October 18, 2024, those payments started to be distributed, hence the screenshots I saw floating around social media.

According to the BBC, 14 million people tried to claim a share of the settlement, but ultimately, about 842,000 claims were officially validated, averaging out to a ~$240 payout per person. However, as you can see from the screenshots, many of these settlements are more than a magnitude greater than $240, so I decided to look into how exactly this settlement worked. The details are just fantastic.

First, claimants had to submit proofs of purchase, which included date of birth, month and year of a claimant’s first Juul purchase, their frequency of purchase, proof of identification, payment information, and, for claims over $300, proof of purchase via receipts. Claimants who were approved were then allocated “points” based on their age and the years in which they made their purchases, and the total settlement would be distributed pro rata based on claimants’ points.

Claimants who purchased between 2019 and 2022 would get one point, claimants who purchased between 2015 and 2018 would get two points, and “Youth Purchases,” which meant any made by an individual whose first purchase occurred before their 18th birthday, were worth four points.

So if you were a 17-year-old in 2016 who bought, and consequently got hooked on, Juuls, and you continued to buy said Juuls through college, all of your purchases got a 4x point multiplier. Not bad! Unfortunately, there were a few factors that limited the total payouts one could receive:

First, “no Retail Expenditure used to assign Points may exceed $1600 per year,” and second, there was a payment cap for claimants equal to 150% of eligible retail expenditures, or 300% of expenditures in the case of Youth Purchases. However, the largest hypothetical payout from this settlement is still pretty good.

Using the settlement’s class-payment cap, if a 17-year-old in 2015 bought at least $1,600 of Juuls and Juul accessories, and proceeded to do so every year through age 24 in 2022, they could, hypothetically, receive $38,400 (300% times $1,600 per year for eight years). It’s unlikely that anyone received that amount, given that expenditures used to assign points couldn’t exceed $1,600 per year, and the distributions were paid out pro rata based on points, but it is possible.

The logic behind this settlement fascinates me. As someone who was in college between the years of 2015 and 2019, I had plenty of friends (not me) whod bought Juuls, and not a single one of them was shocked to find out that Juul may have been less healthy than advertised. They were smoking flavored nicotine from a battery-powered Wii remote. Also, the rationale that someone who bought a Juul in 2015 at age 17 would still be eligible for a 4x higher distribution on their purchases from 2022 at age 24 is fantastic, too.

Still, I wish the class-payment cap didn’t exist, so we could see how large some of these distributions would have been. In our social-media age where dopamine is more valuable than gold, folks all over TikTok and X are chasing engagement by showing off their $3,000 Juul Venmo payments. You have to think that, somewhere, an upper-class 17-year-old in 2015 with access to an Amex black card was dropping $20,000+ on Juuls every year, and I would love to see the viral TikTok of a Juul settlement whale sharing their $200,000+ Juul payout for social-media clout.

For now, it looks like we’ll have to settle for (no pun intended) the $3,000 TikTok reaction videos.

More Business

See all Business
Aldi Grand Opening

Discount stores are having a moment in America, drawing high- and low-income consumers alike

Everyone loves a deal in 2025 — and Aldi, Walmart, and Dollar Tree are all cashing in.

business

Report: OpenAI won’t pay a dime in cash for its 3-year licensing deal for Disney IP

More financial details behind the landmark deal that will grant OpenAI three years of access to Disney intellectual property are coming out, and they’re pretty surprising.

The deal will reportedly see OpenAI pay zero dollars in licensing fees, instead compensating Disney in stock warrants. It was previously reported that Disney would invest $1 billion into OpenAI as part of the agreement.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

business

Ford says it will take $19.5 billion in charges in a massive EV write-down

The EV business has marked a long stretch of losing for Ford, and today the automaker announced it will take $19.5 billion in charges tied, for the most part, to its EV division.

Ford said it’s launching a battery energy storage business, leveraging battery plants in Kentucky and Michigan to “provide solutions for energy infrastructure and growing data center demand.”

According to Ford, the changes will drive Ford’s electrified division to profitability by 2029. The company will stop making its electric F-150, the Lightning, and instead shift to an “extended-range electric vehicle” that includes a gas-powered generator.

The Detroit automaker also raised its adjusted earnings before interest and taxes outlook to “about $7 billion” from a range of $6 billion to $6.5 billion.

Ford’s write-down is one of the largest taken by a company as legacy automakers scale back on EVs, giving EV-only automakers a market share boost.

business

GM adds Apple Music to select new vehicles, racing to fill the gap left by CarPlay’s absence

Earlier this year, General Motors said it plans to end support for in-vehicle phone projection systems like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto on all of its vehicles (a big expansion of the move it announced for its EVs back in 2023).

Now, the automaker appears to be stocking its replacement system with native apps to fill the void. On Monday, GM announced it was rolling out Apple Music to select 2025 Chevrolet and Cadillac models.

Losing CarPlay is a sore subject for many drivers: 39% of respondents to an American Trucks survey this month said a lack of the system (or Android Auto) is a “deal-breaker” when it comes to buying a new vehicle.

Many automakers appear willing to risk alienating those potential customers in exchange for access to lucrative data. Others, including Tesla, are working to allow CarPlay to boost sagging sales, according to reporting by Bloomberg.

Losing CarPlay is a sore subject for many drivers: 39% of respondents to an American Trucks survey this month said a lack of the system (or Android Auto) is a “deal-breaker” when it comes to buying a new vehicle.

Many automakers appear willing to risk alienating those potential customers in exchange for access to lucrative data. Others, including Tesla, are working to allow CarPlay to boost sagging sales, according to reporting by Bloomberg.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.