Business
Mark Zuckerberg departs court on Apr 14
(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Meta offered $450 million to settle its antitrust trial — about $29.5 billion less than the FTC wanted

But Zuckerberg’s business could lose a lot more if it’s forced to sell Instagram or WhatsApp.

The Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust trial against Meta is now heading into its third day, as the company’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp in 2012 and 2014, respectively, are hauled into question.

And according to new Wall Street Journal reporting, it’s a trial that CEO Mark Zuckerberg himself was trying to settle for $450 million on a phone call with the FTC chair in late March — considerably lower than the $30 billion fine the Commission had proposed, and a bargain compared to what it would cost the business were it forced to sell off either of the apps in question.

You’re gonna need a smaller moat

On Monday, the first day of the trial, an FTC lawyer claimed that Meta chiefs were aware that the acquisitions would help the company build a “moat” to fend off competition in the personal social networking industry, creating a monopoly in a space that includes only two other platforms, per the FTC’s argument: Snapchat and smaller platform MeWe.

Meta argued that the Commission has “gerrymandered a fictitious market” with this take, in a company blog post titled, “The FTC’s Weak Case Against Meta Ignores Reality,” which was posted a day before the trial kicked off.

However, the social giant was clearly keen to keep the case out of court — having already forked out the largest tech company fine in FTC history in 2019, handing over $5 billion for violating consumers’ privacy. Looking at how Meta’s business is made up, its attempts to shield its apps from the legal spotlight make a lot of sense.

Meta revenue splits chart
Sherwood News

Since it acquired Instagram for a reported $1 billion in April 2012, Meta’s quarterly revenues are up more than 40x, while ~98% of the $48.4 billion it posted in Q4 2024 came from its family of apps, including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger.

The division is also much more profitable for Meta than its other revenue stream. Apps have brought in a whopping $264 billion since Q4 2020, compared with Reality Labs (home to the company’s AI operations and metaverse ambitions), which has burned $60 billion in the same time frame.

More Business

See all Business
business

Netflix is down amid reports it’s leading the Warner Bros. bidding war as Paramount cries foul

Netflix’s charm offensive appears to be working.

Netflix is reportedly emerging as the leader in the bidding war for Warner Bros. Discovery after second-round bids this week, edging out entertainment juggernaut rivals Comcast and Paramount Skydance.

Investors don’t appear psyched by the streaming leader’s turn of fortune: the stock is down on Thursday morning, a day after closing down nearly 5% following reports that scooping up HBO Max wouldn’t necessarily result in a big market share boost.

Paramount, which has reportedly made five bids for Warner Bros. Discovery, doesn’t love the current state of play, either. The company sent WBD a letter questioning the “fairness and adequacy” of the process, highlighting reports that WBD’s board favors Netflix and is resisting Paramount.

Any offer would be subject to regulatory approval — a fact that may have weighed against Netflix’s offer given that cofounder Reed Hastings’ politics are vocally to the left, very much at odds with the current regulatory regime. Paramount seems confident in its ability to get approval, reportedly boosting its breakup fee to $5 billion should its potential acquisition fall apart in the regulatory process.

Investors don’t appear psyched by the streaming leader’s turn of fortune: the stock is down on Thursday morning, a day after closing down nearly 5% following reports that scooping up HBO Max wouldn’t necessarily result in a big market share boost.

Paramount, which has reportedly made five bids for Warner Bros. Discovery, doesn’t love the current state of play, either. The company sent WBD a letter questioning the “fairness and adequacy” of the process, highlighting reports that WBD’s board favors Netflix and is resisting Paramount.

Any offer would be subject to regulatory approval — a fact that may have weighed against Netflix’s offer given that cofounder Reed Hastings’ politics are vocally to the left, very much at odds with the current regulatory regime. Paramount seems confident in its ability to get approval, reportedly boosting its breakup fee to $5 billion should its potential acquisition fall apart in the regulatory process.

business

Delta says the government shutdown will cost it $200 million in Q4

The 43-day government shutdown that ended last month will result in a $200 million ding for Delta Air Lines, the airline said in a filing on Wednesday.

That’s about $100,000 per shutdown-related canceled flight. (Delta previously said it canceled more than 2,000 flights due to FAA flight reductions.) When the company reports its fourth-quarter earnings, the shutdown will lop off about $0.25 per share.

Delta initially stayed calm about the shutdown, with CEO Ed Bastian stating in early October that the company was running smoothly and hadn’t seen any impacts at all. One historically long shutdown later, Delta wasn’t able to remain untouched.

The skies have since cleared, though, and Delta’s filing states that booking growth has “returned to initial expectations following a temporary softening in November.”

Delta’s shares were up over 2% as of Wednesday’s market open.

Delta initially stayed calm about the shutdown, with CEO Ed Bastian stating in early October that the company was running smoothly and hadn’t seen any impacts at all. One historically long shutdown later, Delta wasn’t able to remain untouched.

The skies have since cleared, though, and Delta’s filing states that booking growth has “returned to initial expectations following a temporary softening in November.”

Delta’s shares were up over 2% as of Wednesday’s market open.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.