Business

Earningacrust

Uncrustables are on track to become a billion-dollar business

PB&J

If growing up you were begrudgingly made to eat your crusts, we’re sorry — you may have just missed the golden age of borderless bread.

Smucker’s Uncrustables are the frozen sealed sandwiches that have taken snacktimes by storm, and might quietly be one of the greatest deals in consumer goods. Since acquiring “Incredible Uncrustables” back in 1998 from two North Dakota dads, consumer giant J.M. Smucker Co. has made even more incredible returns on their $1 million bet, as the brand sold nearly $700 million worth of crustless sandwiches last year.

Indeed, charting the company’s sales of the snack, which have soared 136% since 2019, makes Smucker’s look more like a high-flying tech startup than a brand peddling crustless PB&Js.

Uncrustables sales

Society in a sandwich

It might seem incredulous that so many people would outsource something as quick, simple, and cost-effective as a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. But, in the age of ultra-convenience, the ultra-processed Uncrustables has found a lucrative niche. Sold frozen, many parents turn to the circular treats as an easy option for their kids’ school snacks, putting one in their lunchbox in the morning to be defrosted by noon.

But, in recent years, demand has skyrocketed as Uncrustables’ consumer base has expanded from kids, to big kids, to thousands of full-grown adults, with sales rising some 34% in the last year alone. In fact, the biggest challenge that Smucker’s has had thus far is not making enough sandwiches.

To keep up with the pace of demand, construction is currently underway for an enormous third factory — a cool $1.1 billion project in Alabama, expected to come online next month — that will be devoted solely to making Uncrustables.

[The uncrustables mega factory being built]

With production capacity rising, Smucker’s expects that the brand will become a billion-dollar business by 2026 even in the face of wider headwinds in the processed food industry.

Starsmuck

Smucker’s results are especially astounding considering that they’ve been achieved with minimal advertising efforts. Beyond unprovoked celebrity endorsements from the likes of Lil Yachty, Dillon Francis, and NFL star brothers Jason and Travis Kelce, the latter of which says he eats the snacks “more than anything else in the world”, Uncrustables’ simplicity and mystery — How do they make the bread so soft? What do they do with the crusts? (Animal feed, turns out) — have been enough to intrigue customers.

In 2018, a Tumblr post sparked debate about whether the snacks are ravioli, dumplings, or empanadas. Ever since, social media users have been trying uncrusted recipes, creating their own customized bites with special sandwich cutters, and relentlessly rowing over whether they’re better frozen or thawed. Leaning into the hype, the brand finally aired its first-ever TV ad in November… during a Kelce vs. Kelce football game. Moreover, their quick-fix calorie density has long made them a favorite of NBA athletes, golfers, and, of course, football players: the Baltimore Ravens reportedly got through 7,500 last season.

Sickly sweet

The 128-year-old owner of Uncrustables, the J.M. Smucker Company, is a consumer goods giant, shifting more than $8.5 billion worth of pet food, coffee, and snacks last year.

Growing sales has been hard for Smucker

Although solidly profitable — the company made almost $100m of operating profit each month in the first 9 of its latest fiscal year — Smucker has struggled to take market share in the extremely competitive category of consumer foods, which includes all spreads and snacks. On balance, even with household brands like Folgers coffee, Jif peanut butter (which it acquired in 2001), an expansive pet foods division, and Uncrustables in its portfolio, the company has struggled to grow sales, which expanded at a glacial ~1% a year from 2016 to 2023.

Last November, it made another huge play, acquiring Hostess Brands — makers of Twinkies, DingDongs, and HoHos — for a cool $5.6bn, sending Hostess shares soaring… but Smucker shares down 7% on the news as investors considered the deal too expensive.

Freedom of the press

With great product, though, comes contentious patentability: as it stands, Uncrustables’ iconic circular, crimped shape is trademarked, but not patented. In 2000, the US patent office denied Smucker’s application to extend its original 1998 patent, forgoing the argument that their PB&J was unique because the sandwiches are sealed by compression pressing, rather than “smushing”.

While the “sealed crustless sandwich” patent has gained some infamy in the legal world, it still isn’t the intellectual property of Smucker’s; but, the company has taken it upon itself to stamp out competition. They sent LA-based Chubby Snacks a cease-and-desist in 2020 for their crustless sandwiches on the basis of its roundness being “too similar” to the Uncrustables trademark (the snacks are now “cloud-shaped” to avoid confusion), and, just 2 years later, they were telling another smaller rival, Gallant Tiger, to cut it out.

There’s only so much variation within the realm of the humble PB&J, and it seems the hill that Smucker’s is willing to die on is its disc-like form. Both Costco and Walmart sell popular “no crust frozen sandwiches” by making them rectangular.

The state of snacking

Smucker’s continued attempts to corner the round sandwich market come at a somewhat fraught time to be a snack seller. The dawn of semaglutide products like Ozempic — the get-slim-quick diabetes drugs capturing America’s appetites and supersizing margins for pharmaceutical titans Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk — has made investors less bullish on treats, even for iconic brands.

Snack stocks have lagged the wider market

While the stock market has continued its relentless upward march, with the S&P 500 up 31% since the start of 2023, America’s leading snack brands, previously relatively safe bets even in a recession, are bearing the brunt of foodstuff’s unclear future. Even with the mighty Uncrustables, J.M. Smucker shares have shed 27% in value in the last 16 months — the worst of a group of snack titans that includes PepsiCo (owner of FritoLays) and Hershey (which is also wrestling with soaring cocoa prices).

Turning the glutide

The impact that Ozempic and its peers could have on the food industry is hard to quantify, particularly because of the ways that a “miracle” weight-loss trick (PepsiCo investors HATE her!) might fundamentally change society.

Morgan Stanley recently predicted that 24 million Americans will be taking these medications by 2035, and that those people could cut their daily calorie intake by up to 30%. Despite the high cost of the drugs, in 2023, approximately 1.7% of America’s population had already been prescribed a semaglutide, up 40-fold in the past five years. If these drugs change long-term consumer behavior, ultra-processed, energy dense products like Uncrustables could fall out of favor.

But Uncrustables might be more resilient. Rather than marketing them as an indulgent treat, which is spelling trouble for some brands caught in the consumer cravings chasm, the sandwiches fill the gap for intermittent snacking, a category that’s hardly going to disappear overnight. And, of course, there’s the constant “innovation” — Smucker’s has recently formulated a ready-to-eat, non-leaking refrigerated version of the snack (interestingly developed following the Hostess acquisition).

Billion-dollar ideas don’t need to be complicated.

More Business

See all Business
Paramount Announces It's Cutting 2,000 Jobs

Paramount improved its Warner Bros. offer to $31 per share

WBD confirmed receipt of the new offer on Tuesday and said it would review the proposal.

Vertical Aerospace Valo Launch

Archer Aviation sues rival Vertical, alleging air taxi design patent infringement

Archer Aviation alleged that Vertical’s Valo aircraft “mimics” its own Midnight aircraft.

business

Paramount is expected to raise its Warner Bros. offer to $32 per share

Paramount’s seven-day window to talk to Warner Bros. Discovery about its best and final offer is set to end at 11:59 p.m. ET on Monday, and the company is expected to finally raise the per-share dollar amount of its bid.

According to reporting by Variety, Paramount’s revised offer is likely to arrive at $32 per share for the HBO and CNN parent.

Paramount’s last major revision to its offer came earlier this month, when it said it would cover the $2.8 billion breakup fee that WBD would owe Netflix in the event of that deal falling apart, and would pay shareholders a “ticking fee” of $0.25 per share for every quarter the deal hasn’t closed after the end of 2026.

Netflix’s next move will be determined by the response of Warner Bros.’ board. Per reporting by Reuters, the streamer has ample cash to increase its own offer for its streaming rival. Analysts at MoffettNathanson Research last week said they expect Netflix to walk away from Warner Bros. if Paramount’s bid comes in “well beyond” $32.

As of Monday at 9 a.m. ET, prediction markets speculating on which company will ultimately come out on top of the bidding war have Netflix at a 46% chance over Paramount’s 43% odds.

Also potentially affecting prediction markets is a Truth Social post by President Trump on Sunday, in which Trump wrote that Netflix must fire board member Susan Rice immediately or "pay the consequences."

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 

Paramount’s last major revision to its offer came earlier this month, when it said it would cover the $2.8 billion breakup fee that WBD would owe Netflix in the event of that deal falling apart, and would pay shareholders a “ticking fee” of $0.25 per share for every quarter the deal hasn’t closed after the end of 2026.

Netflix’s next move will be determined by the response of Warner Bros.’ board. Per reporting by Reuters, the streamer has ample cash to increase its own offer for its streaming rival. Analysts at MoffettNathanson Research last week said they expect Netflix to walk away from Warner Bros. if Paramount’s bid comes in “well beyond” $32.

As of Monday at 9 a.m. ET, prediction markets speculating on which company will ultimately come out on top of the bidding war have Netflix at a 46% chance over Paramount’s 43% odds.

Also potentially affecting prediction markets is a Truth Social post by President Trump on Sunday, in which Trump wrote that Netflix must fire board member Susan Rice immediately or "pay the consequences."

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 
business

Microsoft makes dramatic shake-up to its gaming division as gaming CEO Phil Spencer and Xbox President Sarah Bond depart

Microsoft’s gaming division underwent a major shake-up on Friday, as the tech giant announced the departure of gaming CEO Phil Spencer, who led the division for 12 years and championed its Game Pass subscription service.

Xbox President Sarah Bond is also out, according to Spencer’s memo to employees.

Xbox has fallen significantly behind rivals Sony and Nintendo in recent years. Microsoft raised Xbox console prices twice last year and bumped subscription fees up 50%. In November, the console was even outsold (in unit sales) by the motion-controlled Nex Playground console.

The pair have overseen a shift at Xbox from standard consoles to an array of consoles, handhelds, and various devices and screens accessed via cloud gaming.

Spencer’s replacement as the head of gaming is Microsoft’s president of CoreAI product, Asha Sharma. In a memo to staff, Sharma made three commitments: great games, the “return of Xbox,” and to “invent new business models and new ways to play.”

Xbox has fallen significantly behind rivals Sony and Nintendo in recent years. Microsoft raised Xbox console prices twice last year and bumped subscription fees up 50%. In November, the console was even outsold (in unit sales) by the motion-controlled Nex Playground console.

The pair have overseen a shift at Xbox from standard consoles to an array of consoles, handhelds, and various devices and screens accessed via cloud gaming.

Spencer’s replacement as the head of gaming is Microsoft’s president of CoreAI product, Asha Sharma. In a memo to staff, Sharma made three commitments: great games, the “return of Xbox,” and to “invent new business models and new ways to play.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.