Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

A potential Netflix purchase of Warner Bros. streaming and studio assets is causing headaches for investors, per Morgan Stanley

On the surface, it’s easy to see why Netflix would be interested in bidding for Warner Bros. Discovery’s studio and streaming assets: the opportunity to add iconic franchises like DC Comics, Harry Potter, and “The Lord of the Rings, as well as legions of HBO original shows that have stood the test of time.

However, the introduction of all this content, much of which has traditionally generated revenue in ways that Netflix does not, might be adding too many tentacles for even the creator of Squid Games to effectively manage, per Morgan Stanley, which also notes that it’s questionable if regulators would agree to such a tie-up.

“While Netflix is the largest of the reported bidders by a factor, it may have the smallest synergy opportunity and perhaps the toughest regulatory path,” analyst Benjamin Swinburne wrote. “NFLX shares have been under pressure over concerns that a WB acquisition, if announced, would complicate the investment thesis, distract management, and/or dilute EPS.”

The other interested parties are Paramount Skydance and Comcast, per reports.

In short, a successful Netflix acquisition may see the streaming giant need to be able to raise prices and/or subscribers to make enough money from the acquired properties under its distribution umbrella as it veers away from how these assets have made bank, oftentimes through theaters and third-party distribution.

This introduces many “strategic questions,” as Swinburne wrote:

“If acquired, Netflix could choose to shift all theatrical distribution at Warner Bros. to direct release on Netflix, believing that it can generate more value by keeping these films exclusive to Netflix rather than monetizing in other windows — including theatrical. Over time, it could similarly exit the third-party licensing business and distribute all TV series produced by Warner Bros. studios on its own platform.

Such a transition would take time, as TV distribution is built on run-of-series agreements and multi-year licensing deals and talent relationships would likely require some in-production films to still see theatrical distribution. Long-term, however, this kind of business model pivot would put downward pressure on the earnings power of the acquired businesses, which would need to be recouped through faster growth at core Netflix to justify the acquisition price, if a deal were to be announced.

If Netflix were to announce a bid for WB, HBO could bring some similar strategic questions for Netflix. For example, Netflix could shut the service down and shift all content, both originals and licensed, onto Netflix. That would be walking away from nearly $2bn of adj. EBITDA, but Netflix may feel the content can be better monetized on core Netflix.”

Congressman Darrell Issa has written to the attorney general expressing antitrust concerns over the potential for Netflix to purchase Warner Bros. studio and streaming properties, writing that it “currently wields unequaled market power,” adding that these assets would “further enhance this position” to a level “traditionally viewed as presumptively problematic under antitrust law.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Lucid cuts 12% of its US workforce in a profitability push

EV maker Lucid announced on Friday it is laying off 12% of its US workforce as part of its efforts to improve profitability.

This is Lucid’s third round of layoffs since March 2023. At the end of 2024, the company said it had 6,800 employees globally.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

markets

The Supreme Court’s tariff ruling isn’t sweeping relief for automakers, but it isn’t nothing either

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a significant chunk of President Trump’s tariffs, but the decision isn’t a cause for automakers to fully exhale.

Friday’s ruling relates to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and not Section 232. The 25% tariffs on automobiles and auto parts were imposed under Section 232, so those tariffs remain in place.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

markets
Luke Kawa

Nvidia nears $30 billion investment in OpenAI’s funding round, the FT reports

Nvidia is close to investing $30 billion in OpenAI as part of its long-discussed funding round, per the Financial Times.

Bloomberg had previously reported that Nvidia would be investing $20 billion in this round.

The FT says that this investment will effectively be replacing a bigger planned pact between the two companies. The Wall Street Journal had originally reported in late January that Nvidia’s investment of up to $100 billion in OpenAI, which was announced in September, had “stalled” amid private criticisms of the ChatGPT maker by CEO Jensen Huang.

As Microsoft, SoftBank, or Oracle could tell you, being viewed as overly exposed to OpenAI has not been a boon for stocks in recent months.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.