Markets
In this photo illustration, Cerebras Systems logo is seen on...
(Pavlo Gonchar/Getty Images)
Weird Money

Is it bad to rely on one customer for 87% of your revenue? An AI company that’s going public is about to find out

If Nvidia takes heat for relying on just four companies for nearly half its revenue, that’s not a great sign for Cerebras.

Jack Raines

Investors have long been waiting for the proverbial IPO window to reopen, and chipmaker Cerebras Systems may be the answer to their prayers. On Monday, Cerebras, an AI chip maker, filed its S-1 to prepare for an IPO, hoping to capitalize on investor optimism in the sector by joining the public markets. However, Cerebras’s S-1 reveals some glaring issues that I’d like to discuss.

In case you’re unfamiliar with Cerebras (I was), it is the creator of the world’s largest semiconductor. While other chip makers have created smaller and smaller chips over time, Cerebras went big, literally, and its chips are the size of a dinner plate. This larger size provides processing power advantages: While Nvidia’s latest Blackwell chips have 200 billion transistors, Cerebras’s chips have 4 trillion transistors. Additionally, while Nvidia chips are heavily reliant on external memory, Cerebras’s chips host memory directly on the chip, allowing its products to more quickly complete AI inference tasks (inference is the process of using pre-trained AI models to make predictions. The other primary AI function is “training, where a model is taught how to perform a task). Cerebras claims that its chips can complete inference tasks 20 times faster than Nvidia’s GPUs.

That’s great, right? If Cerebras’s chips are 20 times faster than competitors’ products, you would think that big tech companies would be knocking down their door to buy as many as possible. But that hasn’t been happening. While tech giants like Microsoft, Meta, and Alphabet are spending billions on Nvidia’s chips, 87% of Cerebras’s revenue comes from “G42,” an Abu Dhabi-based AI company founded in 2018.

Critics have flagged Nvidia’s revenue concentration as a risk, noting that almost half of Nvidia’s revenue comes from just four customers, but Cerebras’s revenue concentration makes this look like child’s play. And Nvidia’s biggest customers are the largest tech companies in the world, not a six-year-old company based in Abu Dhabi. Cerebras mentioned “G42” an incredible 301 times in its S-1, noting in its risk section:

We currently generate a significant majority of our revenue from one customer, G42, and a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of customers. A reduction in demand from, or a material adverse development in our relationship with, G42 or any of our other significant customers may harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

The S-1 filing shows that G42 also owns a ~1% stake in Cerebras after investing in the company’s 2021 Series F, and Cerebras has granted its primary customer some… favorable terms to expand its investment. Cerebras listed a separate “Class N” stock offering reserved for G42, allowing the company to purchase $335 million in shares at $14.66 per share, a discount to its Series F price of $27.74 per share in December 2021, and G42 also has the right to purchase Class A shares at a 17.5% discount to their fair market value.

I know everyone wants to invest in the next hot AI company, and plenty of investors will probably be willing to overlook customer concentration risk, especially when that company’s revenue increased from $8.7 million through the first six months of 2023 to $136.4 million in the same period in 2024. That being said, I do think it’s worth proceeding with caution given Cerebras’s dependence on, and weird relationship with, its top customer.

More Markets

See all Markets
Bull with Nose Ring

US stocks end volatile week on a positive note

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 both ended well in the green, while the Russell 2000 suffered a loss.

markets

Margins, and selling the news: analysts look to explain Oracle’s tumble

The somewhat counterintuitive tumble in Oracle shares continued into afternoon trading Friday, despite Wall Street analysts’ more or less favorable reaction to Oracle’s investor day presentation Thursday, where executives said the company’s AI cloud business would eventually sport margins of between 30% and 40%, far better than the figures reported by The Information back on September 7.

And yet, the stock is on its way to its worst day in the last six months. What gives?

Gil Lauria, who covers Oracle for D.A. Davidson & Co. — who has it at “hold” with a $300 price target — has a theory, telling Sherwood News:

“Investors are disappointed that the entire growth acceleration in Oracle is from the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure business, and that Oracle expects the rest of the business to grow low single digits.

The other disappointment came from Oracle acknowledging that the GPU rental business only had 30-40% gross margins, far lower than the 80% gross margins for the rest of the business.”

Other analysts we’ve chatted with on background say they’re not convinced the margin story is the source of today’s slump, suggesting the also plausible explanation that the drop might just be a sign traders bought the stock ahead of the presentation to analysts on Thursday anticipating positive announcements, and now they’re selling simply selling the news.

Gil Lauria, who covers Oracle for D.A. Davidson & Co. — who has it at “hold” with a $300 price target — has a theory, telling Sherwood News:

“Investors are disappointed that the entire growth acceleration in Oracle is from the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure business, and that Oracle expects the rest of the business to grow low single digits.

The other disappointment came from Oracle acknowledging that the GPU rental business only had 30-40% gross margins, far lower than the 80% gross margins for the rest of the business.”

Other analysts we’ve chatted with on background say they’re not convinced the margin story is the source of today’s slump, suggesting the also plausible explanation that the drop might just be a sign traders bought the stock ahead of the presentation to analysts on Thursday anticipating positive announcements, and now they’re selling simply selling the news.

markets

Analysts generally like what they heard from Oracle, but shares are down

The big news out from the Oracle AI World conference was broadly positive: that margins on cloud infrastructure can be as high as 35%, and that the company predicts $166 billion in infrastructure revenue by 2030.

And in the wake of that news, today UBS raised its price target for Oracle shares to $380 from $360, saying they are undervalued.

But investors appear to have some concerns about Oracle’s huge capex plans, which are fueled by huge AI infrastructure deals with OpenAI and Meta, as shares dropped over 7% in Friday trading.

Analysts have pointed to Oracle’s high cash burn as it pursues its AI build-out and potential financing needs as flies in the ointment that could blunt the impact of the company’s strong longer-term growth forecasts.

On Friday, Jefferies analysts wrote:

“Questions remain about ORCL’s capex requirements to meet growing demand, as there was no forward-looking commentary on capex at the Analyst Day. Capex will need to ramp in line with [Oracle cloud infrastructure] revenue growth, raising concerns about ORCL’s financing options to support this expansion.”

However, if that’s the reason why the stock is getting hit today, it would mark a distinct change in how investors are evaluating the AI trade. Companies have tended to be increasingly rewarded for their aggressive capex commitments to enhance the boom, based on optimism that investments in this would-be revolutionary technology will bear fruit.

Friday’s dip comes on the back of a strong run leading up to the yesterday’s investor conference, fueled by a flurry of AI headlines. Oracle shares have gained over 18% in the past three months and more than 70% so far this year, well outpacing the Nasdaq’s approximately 7% and 16% rise over the same time periods.

markets

AST SpaceMobile drops after Barclays cuts rating to “underweight”

AST SpaceMobile, which provides cellular services from space, dove in early trading after Barclays analysts cut their rating on the shares to “underweight” (essentially a sell) from “overweight” (or a buy), citing “excessive” valuation on the still money-burning company. The fact that analysts went from “buy” to “sell” — with no momentary stop at a “hold” or “neutral” rating — makes it a fairly rare “double downgrade.”

They wrote:

“Valuation has run ahead of fundamentals... In our last update, we increased our price target from $38 to $60 as we took a more constructive view on pricing; we found it supportive that TMUS/Starlink launched a text only service for $10 per month and believe that AST products which will be richer (text, call, broadband) could see higher prices points. Since then the stock price has doubled from $48 to $95.7.”

With the shares up almost 120% over the last month through Thursday, and a price-to-forward-sales ratio of 140x — the Nasdaq Composite is around 5x — the stock might be due for a cooling-off period.

'There's nothing perfect in this world of growing apples.' Extreme weather could complicate future harvests.

The remarkable rise of the Honeycrisp and Cosmic Crisp apples

When it comes to apples, America cannot get enough of the crunch factor.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.