Markets
Impossible staircase, 1950s.
The first model of the “impossible staircase” (SSPL/Getty Images)

An explosion of speculative call option buying signals the return of retail traders’ favorite weapon

We’re seeing activity that looks an awful lot like gamma squeezes in some of the most speculative stocks.

Luke Kawa

A funny thing happened after the S&P 500 set an all-time high in late June, officially shaking off the tariff-induced tumble.

The benchmark US stock index became pretty boring while an explosion of risk appetite happened below the surface, propelling nonprofitable tech companies, former SPACs fallen from grace, crypto-linked stocks, heavily shorted companies, and other retail favorites sharply higher.

Most of these indexes have reached multiyear, if not record, highs in the process:

Some companies within these baskets have seen their stock prices surge thanks to a clear catalyst, whether that’s Nvidia starting to do business with them or a pivot to holding crypto treasury assets. Some booms, like Opendoor Technologies, have come out of nearly thin air. But what many of them have in common is an underlying market dynamic that’s reinforcing their gains: the gamma squeeze is back

The sequence goes a little something like this: traders buy a ton of call options, and they have to buy them from someone (market makers and/or dealers). These players don’t want to make money by taking the other side of this bet, though. They want to make money through extracting value from every little bit of buying and selling activity that occurs. So when a market maker sells a call — which would leave them exposed to losses if shares of the underlying company rally a ton — they will simultaneously offset that risk by buying a given amount of shares of that company.

When lots of traders are buying options, they are effectively forcing a lot of buying of the underlying stock at the same time! This buying can put upward pressure on the share price, which forces even more buying from these entities that have no view whatsoever on the stock, but are merely trying to cover their butts.

Let’s tie in the Greeks: delta is a term that describes how an option’s price is expected to change based on a $1 shift in the price of the underlying asset. Delta will tend to go up as the stock price goes up. When market makers are buying stock after they’ve sold a call (and buying more if the stock rises after that!), they’re delta-hedging. Gamma is the second derivative of delta; it describes how much the delta is poised to change based on a $1 change in the price action. Gamma is at its highest at the point when the option is at the money. This makes some intuitive sense: whether an option is in the money or out of the money will, at expiration, loosely determine whether or not it has any value.

To sum/to some: the natural response of market makers in an environment where increasing out-of-the-money call option buying propels a stock price higher, pushing that strike in the money and pushing the stock even closer to a higher strike price where another formerly out-of-the-money call option threatens to be money-good, and so on and so forth. It starts to look an awful lot like a perpetual motion money-making machine.

A “gamma squeeze” is the technical explanation for how and why these parabolic moves occur. Market makers are rapidly picking up more deltas, which they need to hedge their exposure because gamma keeps accelerating at different, higher points in the options chain. It’s much easier to see this dynamic play a starring role in smaller stocks and/or ones with constrained float.

This is something that, while very well known by professional options traders, was “discovered” and popularized in the r/WallStreetBets community in early 2020 thanks to… me (whoops). Similar market dynamics played a significant role in the next year’s mania that took shares of GameStop to record highs.

Kawa Post
Source: X, The Trolls of Wall Street

Benjamin Graham, the famous value investor who trained the likes of Warren Buffett, famously quipped, “In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run it is a weighing machine.” 

Well, the gamma squeezes we’re seeing are the market equivalent of stuffing the ballot box in third-world countries.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Intel surges after Trump announces US chip deal with Apple

Intel is soaring in early trading after President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that Apple has agreed to work with the semiconductor giant to design and manufacture its chips domestically.

President Trump positioned the agreement as the latest victory for his administration’s industrial policy after the federal government acquired a 9.9% equity stake in Intel last year.

"Stupid Presidents took our Economy for granted, and let Taiwan and others steal our Semiconductor Factories," Trump wrote in the post. "We design everything, but we need to BUILD it here, NOW! So I decided to help Intel because we need to design and build our Chips right here in America... and, finally, Apple has agreed to work with Intel to design and build its Chips in America."

Intel reportedly reached a preliminary agreement back in May to manufacture chips for the Apple, which has been facing supply constraints for its iPhone as well other products. The deal could help Apple reduce its reliance on longtime partner TSMC by bringing more of its chip manufacturing stateside.

"This partnership helps Apple with chip development and manufacturing on US soil with greater focus on reducing dependence on Asian manufacturing facilities." Wedbush's Dan Ives commented in a company report. He has a $400 price target for Apple this year.

The timing aligns with Intel's technical roadmap. Earlier this week, Intel confirmed that its advanced, performance-boosted 18A-P process node officially entered its risk production phase. This move serves as a blueprint for both Intel chips and processors the company plans to build for foundry customers.

“The current capacity crunch is probably emboldening customers to give Intel a harder look at this stage than perhaps they might ordinarily be inclined to do as the prospect of more advanced capacity will take on higher value in a constrained environment,” wrote Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon. “We are sure that Trump’s encouragement is at least not going to hurt though.”

Momentum was built around Intel Foundry services as surging global AI demand continuously outpaced capacity. Earlier this month, Google reportedly placed an order with Intel to manufacture more than 3 million of its increasingly popular tensor processing unit chips in 2028. According to the report, Nvidia is also testing to see if Intel could manufacture its next-gen Feynman chips.

markets

Stocks rise after US, Iran sign peace plan

Stocks rose Thursday morning after President Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at ending the war, in another sign that a months-long war that caused energy prices to spike could be coming to an end.

Trump signed the MOU before a dinner in Versailles, France on Wednesday evening. The president previously announced that a deal had been reached on Sunday evening, saying that traffic through the Strait of Hormuz would resume and that the US naval blockade would be lifted.

The deal comes after both sides exchanged attacks last week, escalating tensions to some of the highest levels since the US and Israel struck Iran in late February.

The price of Brent Crude ticked even lower after dropping on Sunday, sitting at about $76 a barrel. Oil giants like Shell, Chevron and Exxon fell on the news, as average gas prices in the US dropped below $4 for the first time in months.

Futures for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite rose 0.9% and 1.5%, respectively. Last week, inflation readings for May showed both wholesale inflation and consumer prices rose in large part because of higher energy costs.

Signs of the peace deal have also lead to buying of momentum stocks this week. iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFrose another 1.46% in premarket trading.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.