Markets
LOL BUTTER

Pricehikeshittingawall

Grocery Prices
Getty Images

Just say no to $7 butter

I fancy myself a man of the people.

But, I have to admit, I buy food at either a high-priced regional grocery store — home of the $85 milk and bananas, I call it — or an especially fancy-pants Whole Foods in a swank New York suburb near where I live. (How fancy-pantsy? Let’s just say I once saw JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon ogling the onions.)

I shop there because they’re both closer to my house than the nearest mass-market grocery stores. They’re expensive, but I pay the premium — I figured — to avoid a 20 minute ride.

So when I was dispatched to ShopRite, a protypical mass-market grocery chain, recently for few bulk crowd-pleasers for my daughter’s birthday party, I figured the mass-market prices real Americans pay would be noticeably lower. I was wrong. Case in point: The butter case.

In our house, the butter benchmark is Land-o-Lakes, which was going for $7.29 a pound. That’s higher than my high-priced local grocery store. I couldn’t help but notice that the generic store brand — $4.49 per pound — seemed to be flying off the shelf in response. I even took a picture, because I am a huge nerd.

LOL Butter
Photo: Matt Phillips

Full disclosure, this is the definition of unscientific anecdata. But it fired up my economic Spidey-senses all the same. Were average consumers finally drawing a line about against price hikes some brands have been able to push in the post-Covid world?

Recent numbers out of McDonald’s are consistent with my ShopRite thesis. Fellow Sherwood scribe Luke Kawa wrote last week McDonald’s seems to have hit a price wall with consumers, fueling reports that it is considering a value-based $5 meal promotion.

Other mass-market brands have recounted similar pushbacks on pricing over the last month of earnings announcements:

  • Kraft Heinz, for example, suffered a slump in volumes and fell short of Wall Street earnings estimates, as consumers cut spending on its branded meat products, lunch combos, and mac and cheese.

  • Snack food giant Pepsi’s US sales have slumped as shoppers have avoided its beverages after repeated price increases.

  • Applebee’s owner Dine Brands noted that consumers have become especially price sensitive, and its sales were helped in Q1 by the introduction of a new value-centric menu offerings and promotions.

  • “We have seen ongoing softness in US biscuits driven primarily by brands that have higher penetration among lower-income households, such as Chips Ahoy!,” noted executives at global snack giant Mondelez.

What’s going on? It’s not a mystery. Americans have been able to pay the higher prices corporations have been charging in recent years, because, for most of the post-pandemic era, they’ve had the money.

That income has come from a combination of rising wages and increased government transfers — such as a enhanced food stamp benefits or Covid-related stimulus payments — which are now long gone. Meanwhile, inflation has still been higher than usual. The result? Growth in real, inflation-adjusted, disposable incomes has slowed sharply.

But here’s the bigger question: What does this mean for the economy and the markets? In theory, newfound price sensitivity among US consumers should put some downward pressure on inflation over time. And again, in theory, that could make it easier for the Fed to cut rates, which the stock market continues to hope for.

But it could take a while. For instance, you won’t see too much of an impact when the latest Consumer Price Index report comes out Wednesday, as analysts think that number will be by driven the uncomfortably high prices people are paying for housing, rather than discretionary spending on chocolate chip cookies.

On the other hand, if corporations start to feel pressure on profit margins because consumers won’t swallow price increases, they could start to cut jobs in order to preserve the bottom line, raising the unemployment rate and the risk of a recession.

I have no idea what comes next. But I can’t help but wonder whether the noticeable, seemingly broad move away from some discretionary spending suggests we’re at some sort of turning point in the post-Covid economy.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.