Markets
LOL BUTTER

Pricehikeshittingawall

Grocery Prices
Getty Images

Just say no to $7 butter

I fancy myself a man of the people.

But, I have to admit, I buy food at either a high-priced regional grocery store — home of the $85 milk and bananas, I call it — or an especially fancy-pants Whole Foods in a swank New York suburb near where I live. (How fancy-pantsy? Let’s just say I once saw JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon ogling the onions.)

I shop there because they’re both closer to my house than the nearest mass-market grocery stores. They’re expensive, but I pay the premium — I figured — to avoid a 20 minute ride.

So when I was dispatched to ShopRite, a protypical mass-market grocery chain, recently for few bulk crowd-pleasers for my daughter’s birthday party, I figured the mass-market prices real Americans pay would be noticeably lower. I was wrong. Case in point: The butter case.

In our house, the butter benchmark is Land-o-Lakes, which was going for $7.29 a pound. That’s higher than my high-priced local grocery store. I couldn’t help but notice that the generic store brand — $4.49 per pound — seemed to be flying off the shelf in response. I even took a picture, because I am a huge nerd.

LOL Butter
Photo: Matt Phillips

Full disclosure, this is the definition of unscientific anecdata. But it fired up my economic Spidey-senses all the same. Were average consumers finally drawing a line about against price hikes some brands have been able to push in the post-Covid world?

Recent numbers out of McDonald’s are consistent with my ShopRite thesis. Fellow Sherwood scribe Luke Kawa wrote last week McDonald’s seems to have hit a price wall with consumers, fueling reports that it is considering a value-based $5 meal promotion.

Other mass-market brands have recounted similar pushbacks on pricing over the last month of earnings announcements:

  • Kraft Heinz, for example, suffered a slump in volumes and fell short of Wall Street earnings estimates, as consumers cut spending on its branded meat products, lunch combos, and mac and cheese.

  • Snack food giant Pepsi’s US sales have slumped as shoppers have avoided its beverages after repeated price increases.

  • Applebee’s owner Dine Brands noted that consumers have become especially price sensitive, and its sales were helped in Q1 by the introduction of a new value-centric menu offerings and promotions.

  • “We have seen ongoing softness in US biscuits driven primarily by brands that have higher penetration among lower-income households, such as Chips Ahoy!,” noted executives at global snack giant Mondelez.

What’s going on? It’s not a mystery. Americans have been able to pay the higher prices corporations have been charging in recent years, because, for most of the post-pandemic era, they’ve had the money.

That income has come from a combination of rising wages and increased government transfers — such as a enhanced food stamp benefits or Covid-related stimulus payments — which are now long gone. Meanwhile, inflation has still been higher than usual. The result? Growth in real, inflation-adjusted, disposable incomes has slowed sharply.

But here’s the bigger question: What does this mean for the economy and the markets? In theory, newfound price sensitivity among US consumers should put some downward pressure on inflation over time. And again, in theory, that could make it easier for the Fed to cut rates, which the stock market continues to hope for.

But it could take a while. For instance, you won’t see too much of an impact when the latest Consumer Price Index report comes out Wednesday, as analysts think that number will be by driven the uncomfortably high prices people are paying for housing, rather than discretionary spending on chocolate chip cookies.

On the other hand, if corporations start to feel pressure on profit margins because consumers won’t swallow price increases, they could start to cut jobs in order to preserve the bottom line, raising the unemployment rate and the risk of a recession.

I have no idea what comes next. But I can’t help but wonder whether the noticeable, seemingly broad move away from some discretionary spending suggests we’re at some sort of turning point in the post-Covid economy.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Infleqtion targets revenue growth of 23% in 2026, up from 12% in 2025

Quantum computing firm Infleqtion said it’s aiming to book $40 million in sales this year as it released its 2025 results after the close on Wednesday.

That would be an increase of roughly 23% compared to the $32.5 million in revenues the company generated in 2025, and would mark an acceleration from growth of 12% last year.

The seller of quantum sensors and computers went public via a SPAC in February after carrying a pre-money valuation of $1.8 billion (well below other pure-play peers like Rigetti Computing, IonQ, and D-Wave Quantum).

“We did $29 million in revenue in 2024, and then we announced that we did $50 million of booked and awarded business in 2025. I think that sets a good foundation for significant revenue growth going forward,” CEO Matthew Kinsella told us in February. “I’ve always deeply believed that we need to develop that muscle of commercialization.”

markets

Retail traders are selling everything but the Magnificent 7, per JPMorgan

JPMorgan strategist Arun Jain with the skinny on retail trading activity through 11:30 a.m. ET today:

“Retail investors are selling into today’s strength in both ETFs and Single Stocks. In ETFs, they are trimming their broad-based exposure — a major departure from their typical pattern.”

The SPDR S&P 500 ETF and ProShares UltraPro QQQ suffered particularly large outflows, per Jain.

The exceptions to the selling pressure are the Magnificent 7 stocks, he wrote, with Nvidia, Tesla, Meta, and Microsoft enjoying “small net purchases,” while Micron, TSMC, Exxon, and Chevron were the most dumped names.

Retail trading 4/8

Last week, Jain noted that retail traders had been “skipping the dips, selling into rallies, and positioning more defensively” with markets jittery amid the ongoing Mideast war.

markets

Avis shorts facing $1.1 billion in losses as car rental company racks up 155% gains in its recent rally

Whatever traders are doing with Avis — buying, or just renting — it’s causing short sellers an immense amount of pain.

Shares of the car rental company have traded violently on Wednesday, from up nearly 7% at their highs to down almost 4% at their lows, after a face-ripping rally of 155% over the previous 11 sessions.

Per exchange data, roughly half the shares were sold short as of mid-March. S3 Partners, which tracks higher-frequency measures, said that short interest as a share of float had recently been trimmed to about 43%, down from as high as 53% at the start of the year.

Per Matthew Unterman, managing director at S3, Avis shorts are down $1.1 billion on paper over the past 30 days.

This isn’t Avis’ first rodeo: shares went parabolic in Q4 2021 as part of a meme stock moment in which it briefly became the most valuable company in the Russell 2000 small-cap index.

In any event, cheers to u/Bright_Leopard_4326, who admonished other members of the r/ShortSqueeze subreddit for not paying enough attention to the potential for a boom in the stock 10 days ago, when shares were trading below $150.

AVIS short squeeze
Source: r/ShortSqueeze

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.