Markets
New York City Architecture And Monuments
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JUNE 29: A view of the "Atlas" statue with St. Patrick's Cathedral in the Back at Rockefeller Plaza on June 29, 2022 in New York City. (Photo by Roy Rochlin/Getty Images)

Credit markets have a “debt” problem, not a “risk” problem

We’re getting a lot of borrowing, and that borrowing is risk-reducing (for now!)

Another thing that AI’s disrupting: how investors judge risk in the $7.5 trillion US corporate bond market.

In a note titled “Redefining Quality in Credit,” Amanda Lynam, chief credit strategist at Goldman Sachs, recently observed that ratings are serving as an “imperfect proxy” for how investors want to be positioned.

Corporate bonds are of course credit instruments, but they are also very much bonds (it’s right there in the name). As such, their values are impacted by both the ebbs and flows of how risky investors think it is to lend to individual companies as well as changes in risk-free rates. The pick-up in issuance year to date has come primarily from bonds with higher credit ratings, which are underperforming lower-rated counterparts.

Even after taking into account that higher-quality debt is more negatively impacted by higher interest rates, those bonds are still underperforming riskier debt in 2026! So the nascent trend is that riskier bonds are actually "higher quality" because they're less bond and more risk.

Per Lynam:

“The catalyst has been the growing tension between solid fundamentals and challenging supply technicals within certain ‘high quality’ rating cohorts. In IG and HY, the highest rating categories (i.e., AAs in IG, and BBs in HY) are generating historically elevated shares of total debt issuance, driven in large part by AI-related financing. The returns within these rating categories also tend to be the most sensitive to higher interest rates, given their longer duration profiles and thinner spread 'cushions' to buffer total returns.

This backdrop is driving outperformance from the lower-rated cohorts. For example, across the USD and EUR markets, BBBs have outperformed AAs and As on both a total and excess return basis.”

“Bonds” are out of favor while “risk” is in vogue because the kind of debt growth we’re getting now is risk-reducing and profit-enhancing, at least on shorter time horizons.

Hyperscalers — the companies with among the biggest revenue-generating capabilities in the world and robust balance sheets — are driving a ton of borrowing, as is the US government. Fiscal deficits and megacap tech capex are other companies’ profits.

The way debt problems become risk problems is if these fail to create sufficient returns, or if all of the spending associated with the increase in indebtedness fuels inflation, and that inflation causes the central bank to jack up interest rates until overall activity succumbs to tighter policy.

In any event, for now these dynamics are on track for a performance gap between higher and lower quality investment grade debt that hasn’t been since the financial crisis.

“While down-in-quality outperformance within IG is not unusual from an excess-return perspective, the current divergence is somewhat pronounced. For example, if returns continue on the current trajectory, 2026 will mark the first year in the post-GFC period that AAs have posted negative excess returns while both As and BBBs have generated positive excess returns."

Goldman credit performance by ratings

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.