Markets
markets

Enhanced Games producer plunges after merely one “record-breaking” performance, with several clean athletes winning

Last week, ahead of the Enhanced Games, a spectacle that featured chemically enhanced athletes competing in a doped-up weekend version of the Olympic Games, our Edward Moreno wrote that the event “isn’t just about sports — it’s a $31 million product demo.” 

If investors are telling us anything the Tuesday morning after the games, it’s that they don’t believe the product demo worked. Shares of Enhanced Group, the company that put on the games, tanked a whopping 40% in early trading, falling to their lowest level since the company went public via a SPAC. 

The drop comes after enhanced Greek swimmer Kristian Gkolomeev “broke” the only world record of the games in the 50-meter freestyle, while doping and also wearing a suit that’s illegal in elite sport. Meanwhile, three athletes who were reportedly competing clean in the games also won their events over enhanced athletes. 

After the games, Enhanced CEO Maximilian Martin underscored what we wrote last week: that this was all aimed at getting regular people to want to dope, too. It was about showcasing athletes who might cause regular people to want to subscribe to Enhanced’s newly launched consumer health business that sells supplements. According to The Guardian, he said: 

“With the power of enhancements we can prove we are the best we can ever think of and you are ­living proof of that. For the last three days Enhanced took over the internet. Enhanced is culture. And now people can also get enhanced and be the best they have ever been.”

If today’s stock reaction is any indication, investors don’t think the Enhanced Games are going to cause that many regular folks to sign up.

It would appear that the outcomes of the games themselves undermine the very case Enhanced was aiming to make to customers and investors. After all, if all it takes to become a world-class champion athlete is “hard work” and “dedication” and not a cocktail of designer peptides, well, investors are probably better off throwing their money into Planet Fitness or Peloton.

If investors are telling us anything the Tuesday morning after the games, it’s that they don’t believe the product demo worked. Shares of Enhanced Group, the company that put on the games, tanked a whopping 40% in early trading, falling to their lowest level since the company went public via a SPAC. 

The drop comes after enhanced Greek swimmer Kristian Gkolomeev “broke” the only world record of the games in the 50-meter freestyle, while doping and also wearing a suit that’s illegal in elite sport. Meanwhile, three athletes who were reportedly competing clean in the games also won their events over enhanced athletes. 

After the games, Enhanced CEO Maximilian Martin underscored what we wrote last week: that this was all aimed at getting regular people to want to dope, too. It was about showcasing athletes who might cause regular people to want to subscribe to Enhanced’s newly launched consumer health business that sells supplements. According to The Guardian, he said: 

“With the power of enhancements we can prove we are the best we can ever think of and you are ­living proof of that. For the last three days Enhanced took over the internet. Enhanced is culture. And now people can also get enhanced and be the best they have ever been.”

If today’s stock reaction is any indication, investors don’t think the Enhanced Games are going to cause that many regular folks to sign up.

It would appear that the outcomes of the games themselves undermine the very case Enhanced was aiming to make to customers and investors. After all, if all it takes to become a world-class champion athlete is “hard work” and “dedication” and not a cocktail of designer peptides, well, investors are probably better off throwing their money into Planet Fitness or Peloton.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.