Markets
St Louis Battlehawks v Memphis Showboats
The FedEx Cares relay (Wes Hale/Getty Images)
FedExpectations

FedEx’s quarterly report is exactly what you don’t want to see in the upcoming earnings season

FedEx’s results underscore that while tariffs are a solved problem in the eyes of the stock market, they are not for US executives.

Luke Kawa

FedEx’s quarterly report is every fear that could be realized during the second-quarter earnings season rolled into one.

The stock market is a game of “what have you done for me lately?” or, more accurately, “what are you going to do for me in the future?” So when the US shipping giant posted better-than-expected fourth-quarter earnings but an ugly outlook for the three months ending August, shares tumbled (though they’ve pared losses to about 2.6% as of 10:55 a.m. ET).

The FedEx conference call was dominated by one key line of questioning: how much is spending changing depending on the tariff outlook? Was there a drop-off in spending and then a big rush to buy after levies were scaled back? Or a massive spike in demand ahead of potential tariffs that then subsided? In other words: was your success a one-off, or is it repeatable?

Those are some queries that seeped into first-quarter earnings discussions, despite Liberation Day coming after the end of March. Most notably, look at Apple’s iPhone sales. Some other instances where management faced questions surrounding pulled-forward demand in the Q1 reporting period included Texas Instruments, Power Integrations, Intrepid Potash, and Mobileye, to name a few.

“Whether or not there is consumer pull forward is TBD,” Chief Customer Officer Brie Carere said, while adding that activity over the quarter was also quite lumpy. “Customs entries in May were double the January through April average.”

If FedEx is any indication, these questions are going to get asked more and more often during the upcoming reporting period.

While executives may not have all the answers, FedEx’s poor guidance for the current quarter, as well as how poorly the stock is doing relative to the overall market, speaks volumes. The stock, which has a reputation as something of an economic bellwether given its connections to global trade and consumer demand, is trading at its lowest level relative to the S&P 500 since 2001, when the US was in recession after the dot-com bubble burst. 

It’s dangerous to extrapolate from any one company’s results, and FedEx’s underperformance includes company-specific issues and is certainly not a pure signal of impending US economic doom. But its C-Suite is far from the only one that continues to fret about the potential impact of levies on US imports and retaliatory measures from other countries.

The recent release of the Q2 CFO Survey reveals an increased level of angst around tariffs in corporate boardrooms. The share of firms that cited trade or tariffs as their most pressing concern picked up from Q1 to Q2.

Of note: this survey was conducted between May 19 and June 6, a period when the S&P 500 was already about 20% above its early April lows, reciprocal tariffs had already been watered down, and a trade truce with China had been reached.

Tariffs, in the eyes of the stock market, are a solved problem. In the eyes of US executives, they are not. 

“We have a referendum on global supply chains every single day,” FedEx president and CEO Rajesh Subramaniam said, which is obviously not an ideal operating environment, to say the least.

CFOSurvey

In addition to “what have you done for me lately?” the stock market is also a game of “what’s in the price?”

And that’s where another tidbit from FedEx bears monitoring: its capex budget for the 12 months ending May 2026 came in about half a billion below expectations, at $4.5 billion.

One firm’s capex is another firm’s profits. Because investment outlays are depreciated over time by the spender but recognized immediately as revenues by the recipient, capex has an accretive effect on overall earnings.

Thanks in large part to increased confidence in the longevity of the AI boom, S&P 500 12-month forward capex estimates are at all-time highs. So are earnings-per-share forecasts.

The good news is that FedEx, a decidedly un-AI company, is not as representative of the market-cap-weighted S&P 500, which is dominated by megacap tech firms.

The bad news is that sufficiently negative macroeconomic dynamics come for every firm, as we saw quite clearly during March and early April.

And the OK news is that it’s not clear FedEx is an especially potent macro bellwether, or whether the US economy is in the midst of a drawn-out slowdown or suffering a more severe loss of momentum.

We’ll have to wait for the real start of earnings season in a few weeks to find out.

More Markets

See all Markets
Dickens, Great Expectations, He said, Aha! would you?

Tech tumbles as momentum stocks run into a blowout jobs report and a wave of profit-taking

The AI trade is under some pressure, taking prices back like... a few days. President Donald Trump is not a fan of the price action.

Trump Administration Considers Reclassifying Marijuana As A Less Dangerous Drug

Trulieve to list on NYSE, a first for US cannabis sector

More may be on the way: several other US cannabis companies have announced reverse stock splits with the intention of listing on a major exchange.

markets

Lululemon’s stretch getting tested: Stock plunges after after outlook is cut

Lululemon shares are down double digits in premarket trading after the company cut its full-year sales and profit outlook, overshadowing a Q1 beat and raising fresh concerns about the brand’s turnaround efforts.

The company now expects fiscal 2026 revenue to be flat to down 1%, compared with its prior forecast for 2% to 4% growth. Guidance for full-year diluted earnings per share was dragged down to a range of $10.95 to $11.15, below the company’s previous guidance of $12.10 to $12.30 and well below Wall Street’s estimate of $13.26.

Key numbers for Q1:

  • EPS of $1.69 vs. the $1.68 expected.

  • Revenue of $2.47 billion vs. the $2.43 billion expected.

The modest top-line beat masked a widening divergence between Lululemons geographic markets. While international revenue rose 22% overall with a 30% increase in Mainland China, the bigger problem remains North America, where revenue fell 5%.

Interim co-CEO and CFO Meghan Frank acknowledged during the earnings call that recent product rollouts underperformed. A highly anticipated yoga campaign failed to generate its expected halo effect across broader product lines.

Profitability metrics took a major hit, with gross margins contracting by 410 basis points to 54.2% due to mounting tariff costs and promotional markdowns. Operating income consequently fell 37% year over year to $276.9 million.

“We experienced spikes of negative commentary in the media and on social channels with regard to our brand, which had an impact on traffic and overall top-line performance,” Frank said during the earnings call. “And second, not all of our product launches have met our expectations. While we have had several successful launches so far this year, we have seen others as we start Q2 not generate the anticipated guest response.”

Lululemons valuation has already been steadily compressing for years. While it was once one of retails richly valued stocks, investors have been questioning whether the company can return to the double-digit growth era.

The results also arrive during a leadership transition. Lululemon announced back in April that former Nike executive Heidi ONeill is set to take over as CEO in September, with investors looking to her to revive growth in North America and restore the brands growth.

As Lululemon faces both macroeconomic pressure and brand-specific challenges, its stock has dropped around 40% year to date.

markets

US job growth skyrocketed in May, blasting past expectations

The US economy added 172,000 jobs in the month of May, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday, sending 10-year Treasury yields higher.

The strong May job market surprised economists. Experts had predicted only 85,000 new jobs — just half the reported number. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, as expected.

The job growth story is a hopeful spot for the economy as consumers continue to feel inflationary pressure from the Iran war.

Job gains were buoyed by the leisure and hospitality sector, which added 70,000 jobs, as well as local government, healthcare, and education.

Both the March and April jobs reports were revised upward, making them collectively 93,000 higher than previously reported.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.