Markets
US Home building
New inventory in Irvine, Calif. (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Homebuilding stocks get another burst of outperformance

Even though they’re building remarkably few houses.

A better-than-expected earnings report from luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers is giving a fresh burst of momentum to homebuilding stocks on Wednesday.

Toll Brothers brought in $482 million in profits — 10% better than expected — on slightly better than expected sales of $2.73 billion. Profit margins, on an adjusted basis, of nearly 29% were a key driver of outperformance. Costs only rose slightly.

The stock soared on the report, pulling along share prices of competitors and extending a solid run of outperformance for the sector.

The angle of incline for homebuilder shares has risen sharply as inflation has softened in recent months, and investors have concluded that the Fed is all but certain to cut interest rates when it meets next month. (Though there remains some debate about how big a cut it will deliver.)

Of course, the housing market is the example par excellence of an interest-rate sensitive sector of the economy. The expected decline in Fed rates has been transmitted through the bond market into a drop in mortgage rates, which are now around 6.50% for the 30-year fixed.

That should boost activity among homebuyers. But, for my money, the remarkable thing about the recent rise in home builder share prices is that it comes amid a remarkable dearth of actual homebuilding. Housing starts tumbled to a four-year low in July — which, to be fair, was likely affected by bad weather — but still!

How does this make sense? Well, believers in the all-seeing power of financial markets might argue that perspicacious traders are simply pricing in the uptick in activity that they see coming in the future as mortgage rates move lower. Slightly more cynical observers might simply note that the current state of affairs in the housing market — low inventory, high prices — means that homebuilders don’t have to build as much to make the amount of money Wall Street expects. Probably a little bit from Column A, a little bit from Column B.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Lucid cuts 12% of its US workforce in a profitability push

EV maker Lucid announced on Friday it is laying off 12% of its US workforce as part of its efforts to improve profitability.

This is Lucid’s third round of layoffs since March 2023. At the end of 2024, the company said it had 6,800 employees globally.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

markets

The Supreme Court’s tariff ruling isn’t sweeping relief for automakers, but it isn’t nothing either

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a significant chunk of President Trump’s tariffs, but the decision isn’t a cause for automakers to fully exhale.

Friday’s ruling relates to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and not Section 232. The 25% tariffs on automobiles and auto parts were imposed under Section 232, so those tariffs remain in place.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

markets

Nvidia nears $30 billion investment in OpenAI’s funding round, the FT reports

Nvidia is close to investing $30 billion in OpenAI as part of its long-discussed funding round, per the Financial Times.

Bloomberg had previously reported that Nvidia would be investing $20 billion in this round.

The FT says that this investment will effectively be replacing a bigger planned pact between the two companies. The Wall Street Journal had originally reported in late January that Nvidia’s investment of up to $100 billion in OpenAI, which was announced in September, had “stalled” amid private criticisms of the ChatGPT maker by CEO Jensen Huang.

As Microsoft, SoftBank, or Oracle could tell you, being viewed as overly exposed to OpenAI has not been a boon for stocks in recent months.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.