Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

More bank executives going tieless have Morgan Stanley thinking the bull market is back

A fun observation from Morgan Stanley analyst Betsy Graseck: bank executives are ditching their ties again in what could be a positive signal about the market backdrop.

From a note to clients:

“Ever since Covid brought a more relaxed dress code to the financial industry, we have been tracking the return of the tie at our conference. For the first time since we began tracking in 2021, slightly fewer executives as a % of total wore a tie y/y... a bull market indicator? 49% of executives presenting at our 2025 conference wore a tie (menswear only), a decrease from peak of 53% in 2024. CEOs saw the sharpest decline with 67% wearing a tie this year, down from 83% in 2024. CFOs decreased to only 37% wearing a tie, down from 44% in 2024. Other executives were stable at 50% wearing a tie, flat y/y.”

MorganStanleyTie

Things like the hemline index (length of women’s skirts) or the thickness of former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan’s briefcase have been trotted out as offbeat ways to track sentiment or price action. Let’s add the necktie indicator to that list.

Wall Street dress codes became more lax in the aftermath of the pandemic. At the extreme, I can remember a day at UBS when summer interns even had a wear-your-pajamas-to-work day.

JPMorgan, the largest US private financial institution, was ahead of the curve in this regard, having relaxed its dress code back in 2016. CEO Jamie Dimon would later don polos in television interviews.

But things apparently got a little tighter under the collar, literally, after 2021 until this year.

In any event, this is great news for those of us who would sooner tie one on than wear a necktie.

Separately, Morgan Stanley’s head of US equity strategy, Michael Wilson, offered a different reason to expect strength in equity prices: it’s the earnings, stupid.

“Key gauges we follow are pointing to a stronger earnings backdrop than many expect over the next 6-12 months, based on our conversations,” he wrote. “First, our main earnings model is showing high-single-digit EPS growth over the next year. Second, earnings revisions breadth is inflecting higher — it bottomed at -25% in mid-April and is now at -9%.”

But who needs earnings when you don’t have neckties?

More Markets

See all Markets
Bull with Nose Ring

US stocks end volatile week on a positive note

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 both ended well in the green, while the Russell 2000 suffered a loss.

Toby Bochan10/17/25
markets

Margins, and selling the news: analysts look to explain Oracle’s tumble

The somewhat counterintuitive tumble in Oracle shares continued into afternoon trading Friday, despite Wall Street analysts’ more or less favorable reaction to Oracle’s investor day presentation Thursday, where executives said the company’s AI cloud business would eventually sport margins of between 30% and 40%, far better than the figures reported by The Information back on September 7.

And yet, the stock is on its way to its worst day in the last six months. What gives?

Gil Lauria, who covers Oracle for D.A. Davidson & Co. — who has it at “hold” with a $300 price target — has a theory, telling Sherwood News:

“Investors are disappointed that the entire growth acceleration in Oracle is from the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure business, and that Oracle expects the rest of the business to grow low single digits.

The other disappointment came from Oracle acknowledging that the GPU rental business only had 30-40% gross margins, far lower than the 80% gross margins for the rest of the business.”

Other analysts we’ve chatted with on background say they’re not convinced the margin story is the source of today’s slump, suggesting the also plausible explanation that the drop might just be a sign traders bought the stock ahead of the presentation to analysts on Thursday anticipating positive announcements, and now they’re selling simply selling the news.

Gil Lauria, who covers Oracle for D.A. Davidson & Co. — who has it at “hold” with a $300 price target — has a theory, telling Sherwood News:

“Investors are disappointed that the entire growth acceleration in Oracle is from the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure business, and that Oracle expects the rest of the business to grow low single digits.

The other disappointment came from Oracle acknowledging that the GPU rental business only had 30-40% gross margins, far lower than the 80% gross margins for the rest of the business.”

Other analysts we’ve chatted with on background say they’re not convinced the margin story is the source of today’s slump, suggesting the also plausible explanation that the drop might just be a sign traders bought the stock ahead of the presentation to analysts on Thursday anticipating positive announcements, and now they’re selling simply selling the news.

markets
Jon Keegan

Analysts generally like what they heard from Oracle, but shares are down

The big news out from the Oracle AI World conference was broadly positive: that margins on cloud infrastructure can be as high as 35%, and that the company predicts $166 billion in infrastructure revenue by 2030.

And in the wake of that news, today UBS raised its price target for Oracle shares to $380 from $360, saying they are undervalued.

But investors appear to have some concerns about Oracle’s huge capex plans, which are fueled by huge AI infrastructure deals with OpenAI and Meta, as shares dropped over 7% in Friday trading.

Analysts have pointed to Oracle’s high cash burn as it pursues its AI build-out and potential financing needs as flies in the ointment that could blunt the impact of the company’s strong longer-term growth forecasts.

On Friday, Jefferies analysts wrote:

“Questions remain about ORCL’s capex requirements to meet growing demand, as there was no forward-looking commentary on capex at the Analyst Day. Capex will need to ramp in line with [Oracle cloud infrastructure] revenue growth, raising concerns about ORCL’s financing options to support this expansion.”

However, if that’s the reason why the stock is getting hit today, it would mark a distinct change in how investors are evaluating the AI trade. Companies have tended to be increasingly rewarded for their aggressive capex commitments to enhance the boom, based on optimism that investments in this would-be revolutionary technology will bear fruit.

Friday’s dip comes on the back of a strong run leading up to the yesterday’s investor conference, fueled by a flurry of AI headlines. Oracle shares have gained over 18% in the past three months and more than 70% so far this year, well outpacing the Nasdaq’s approximately 7% and 16% rise over the same time periods.

markets

AST SpaceMobile drops after Barclays cuts rating to “underweight”

AST SpaceMobile, which provides cellular services from space, dove in early trading after Barclays analysts cut their rating on the shares to “underweight” (essentially a sell) from “overweight” (or a buy), citing “excessive” valuation on the still money-burning company. The fact that analysts went from “buy” to “sell” — with no momentary stop at a “hold” or “neutral” rating — makes it a fairly rare “double downgrade.”

They wrote:

“Valuation has run ahead of fundamentals... In our last update, we increased our price target from $38 to $60 as we took a more constructive view on pricing; we found it supportive that TMUS/Starlink launched a text only service for $10 per month and believe that AST products which will be richer (text, call, broadband) could see higher prices points. Since then the stock price has doubled from $48 to $95.7.”

With the shares up almost 120% over the last month through Thursday, and a price-to-forward-sales ratio of 140x — the Nasdaq Composite is around 5x — the stock might be due for a cooling-off period.

'There's nothing perfect in this world of growing apples.' Extreme weather could complicate future harvests.

The remarkable rise of the Honeycrisp and Cosmic Crisp apples

When it comes to apples, America cannot get enough of the crunch factor.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.