Markets
markets

Repent callow trader, for a death cross is upon us

It might have seemed like a somewhat decent day yesterday, but it wasn’t enough to prevent the emergence of one of the more ominously named technical patterns from surfacing in the chart of the S&P 500 (SPDR S&P 500 Trust) .

Yes, we are talking about the so-called death cross.

For those unfamiliar with the argot of technical traders, a death cross is when a 50-day moving average falls below the 200-day moving average, with both trending lower. As the name implies, this switcheroo is thought to be a somewhat ominous development, suggesting a serious, and perhaps durable, breakdown of price momentum.

But like a lot of things in technical analysis — a stock market subculture which eschews consideration of fundamentals like profits and losses in favor of watching price charts for clues about where asset prices will go next — the death cross’s track record of signaling a continued slump in stocks is far from flawless.

In fact, technical analysts from Bank of America looked at the 50 death crosses (before Monday’s) that have occurred in the S&P 500 since 1927, and they found no clear signal that the market will fall in the days following the cross.

It’s basically a coin flip as to whether the market will be up or down in the days after the indicator is triggered, and essentially the death cross is “not as bearish as it sounds,” BofA analysts wrote in a note Monday — though they caution that the signal is a bit worse if you restrict the death crosses just to instances when the 200-day moving average is also falling, which it is now.

For those unfamiliar with the argot of technical traders, a death cross is when a 50-day moving average falls below the 200-day moving average, with both trending lower. As the name implies, this switcheroo is thought to be a somewhat ominous development, suggesting a serious, and perhaps durable, breakdown of price momentum.

But like a lot of things in technical analysis — a stock market subculture which eschews consideration of fundamentals like profits and losses in favor of watching price charts for clues about where asset prices will go next — the death cross’s track record of signaling a continued slump in stocks is far from flawless.

In fact, technical analysts from Bank of America looked at the 50 death crosses (before Monday’s) that have occurred in the S&P 500 since 1927, and they found no clear signal that the market will fall in the days following the cross.

It’s basically a coin flip as to whether the market will be up or down in the days after the indicator is triggered, and essentially the death cross is “not as bearish as it sounds,” BofA analysts wrote in a note Monday — though they caution that the signal is a bit worse if you restrict the death crosses just to instances when the 200-day moving average is also falling, which it is now.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Trump’s “impossible trinity” on AI and energy

Everyone loves a good trilemma.

In economics, the most famous of the genre was developed by Fleming and Mundell, which posits that you can only successfully achieve two of the following three objectives: the free flow of capital, a fixed exchange rate, and independent sovereign monetary policy.

George Pollack, senior US policy analyst at Signum Global Advisors, proposed a trilemma of his own to describe the Trump administration’s competing policy aims as a red-hot AI boom devours power and leaves households miffed by rising electricity bills.

He wrote:

“This note flags what we believe to be a simple reality whose salience will continue growing in US politics in coming months: the Trump administration, in its remaining three years will face a trilemma as the nation waits for its energy bet to play out — proving able to achieve two, but not all three, of the following objectives:

-Fulfill AI’s energy-appetite.
-Keep repressing renewable sources of energy.
-Appease American electricity consumers.”

Trump AI trilemma

As for evidence that the Trump administration is taking a fossil fuels-first approach while stunting renewables, Pollack pointed to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which shrinks access to tax credits for green energy, as well as the end to the federal pause on liquefied natural gas export permits. However, it would be “inaccurate and unfair” to blame President Trump’s policies for surging electricity prices in recent months, he added.

While the government has pursued the expansion of nuclear power as a way to solve this trilemma, the long lead times involved are incongruent with a short-term fix.

Palantir reports Q3 earnings results

Palantir climbs toward a fresh record high ahead of earnings report

Traders and Wall Street are waiting to see whether Palantir’s latest numbers after market close today will continue to beat expectations.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.