Markets
US-ENTERTAINMENT-PRIZE-BREAKTHROUGH
Serial SPAC sponsor Chamath Palihapitiya (Etienne Laurent / Getty Images)

Return of the SPAC

Oh my god.

It looks like one of my favorite feats of financial engineering might be mounting a comeback. From The Financial Times:

New fundraising [for SPACs] has been improving slowly this year, rising about 20 per cent over the same period of 2023 to $3.1bn, according to Dealogic, and advisers are expecting activity to pick up pace. More than 20 Spacs have filed IPO documents since the start of June, targeting a combined $4.3bn in fundraising. That compares with just $1.8bn raised in the entire second half of 2023.

“There are over 1,300 unicorns out there, and the exit route on both the IPO side and the strategic M&A side has been closed,” said Jimmy Fang, chief operating officer at Spac sponsor Explorer Acquisitions. “Even in the hottest tech IPO market ever, you’re unlikely to get more than 150 IPOs in one year. What happens to the remaining companies? . . . I’m not saying SPACs will fill the entire void there, but I certainly believe they can fill a sizable amount.”

SPACs, obviously, got overhyped in 2020 and 2021, considering that everyone from NBA champion Shaquille O’Neal to former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan launched a SPAC, and as the market grew frothier, the quality of “businesses” going public in SPAC deals deteriorated.

Electric vehicle startups with no revenue, electric scooter startups with broken business models,  marijuana seller review platforms, and rare earth metal-based battery producers not expected to be cash flow-positive for six years all went public through SPACs, and, as you could guess, most didn’t perform too well in the public markets.

However, not every company that went public through a SPAC was a bad company. School bus manufacturer Blue Bird, IT infrastructure provider Vertiv, sports betting platform DraftKings, and potato chip maker Utz all went public through reverse mergers with SPACs, and they’ve fared quite well in public markets. The issue is less “SPACs” and more the quality of a company that looked to go public through a reverse merger with a SPAC.

SPACs provide an expedited IPO process with less regulatory hurdles than traditional IPOs. In 2021, the public market appetite for new listings was massive, so “good” companies had no trouble going public through an IPO, and the only companies willing to do a SPAC deal would have been those that couldn’t attract the investor interest needed to support a traditional IPO (for context, Blue Bird, DraftKings, and Vertiv all announced their deals well before the pandemic, and Utz announced its deal in June 2020, before valuations got crazy). Naturally, many of these companies had no business being public.

However, IPO markets are now frozen, many venture and private equity investors need exits to return capital to their investors, and many of their portfolio companies are either 1) worth more than $1 billion, 2) profitable, or 3) both. If the IPO market remains cold, SPACs could become an attractive alternative to get portfolio companies to the public markets.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.