Markets
UK Prime Minister Meets With President Trump In Washington
Look! Over there! At Nvidia! Don’t look at me. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
BLAME GAME

Nvidia or Trump’s tariffs? Who’s to blame for the S&P 500’s tumble into the red for 2025?

Let’s look at the market scoreboard.

Luke Kawa

After the close on Wednesday, Nvidia released a set of quarterly results that, while impressive on the surface, failed to wow traders.

Ahead of the market open on Thursday, President Donald Trump recommitted to 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, as well as a 10% levy on Chinese imports effective March 4.

Which bears more blame for the S&P 500’s 1.6% drop, which erased its gains for the year?

Well, let’s turn to the market scoreboard.

A basket of stocks selected by Goldman Sachs as being particularly vulnerable to potential Trump tariffs fell 2% on the day. That’s bad! The Nasdaq 100, however, was worse, with a 2.8% decline.

If we go back to the start of last September (an arbitrary line for beginning to price in potential impacts of a Trump presidency), this day ranks in the 77th percentile for how this cohort performed compared to the Magnificent 7. That is to say, in only about 23% of sessions did tariff-exposed stocks outperform the tech giants by more than they did on Thursday. For tariff-vulnerable stocks versus the Nasdaq 100, this was a 75th percentile day over the same time frame.

Tariff-sensitive stocks suffered a larger decline last Friday than they did on Thursday, whereas this was far and away the Nasdaq 100’s worst session since the DeepSeek-induced plunge.

Zooming out, since September, Goldman’s basket of tariff-exposed stocks is up modestly, while a basket of stocks judged to be well insulated from trade barriers is down nearly 5%.

(The same performance gap holds true if we’re just looking since Election Day, too!)

There is not strong evidence to suggest that tariffs have been a big driver of price action in general, and on Thursday in particular.

If the stock market is in the process of “waking up” to the threat of tariffs, Thursday was more akin to groggily hitting the snooze button. Again.

Don’t overthink it: when a ̶$̶3̶ $2.93 trillion chip designer tumbles after reporting earnings and the rest of the sector goes with it, Occam’s Razor applies.

An appropriate diagnosis of what’s happening in the here and now — particularly during a market drawdown — is important because it offers a lens into what can or might happen next, and what kind of catalysts investors should look out for that might change the character of the tape.

If the phrase “growth scare” is coming up more and more often but the pain points in the market are the meltdowns in former high-flying stocks that aren’t considered to be highly economically sensitive and credit spreads are still relatively well behaved, then it isn’t a growth scare yet! But it could certainly become one. Or not!

Of note: financials, an indisputably cyclical sector whose outlook is inextricably tied to the health of the US economy, was the best-performing S&P 500 sector ETF on Thursday, putting in a 0.6% gain.

If you’re in the midst of a growth scare or tariff-induced sell-off, the top things to monitor are the evolution of the economic data and any chatter related to trade barriers. If you’re looking for what reverses a momentum breakdown, the answer is much more likely to be found in technicals and flows — key levels where certain important names might find a floor. To that end, Nvidia has broken down below its 200-day moving average, and Tesla is trading nearly bang on that level.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Opendoor CEO Kaz Nejatian pledges to buy $1 million in company stock when the opening bell rings on Tuesday

Headline kind of explains the story here!

From the source:

Opendoor Technologies made its biggest-ever intraday comeback on Friday, from down more than 20% to closing flat, and surged on Monday as management revealed a dividend of tradable warrants (which will cause headaches for short sellers) along with the company’s Q3 results after the market closed on Thursday.

Getting insiders to buy more stock and have their incentives aligned with shareholders has been something that EMJ Capital’s Eric Jackson, the architect of the surge of retail interest in the online real estate company, has stressed. Jackson flagged his previous experience with Carvana — when CEO Ernie Garcia and many directors bought more shares of the company even as it was nose-diving — as giving him greater confidence in owning that name.

markets

CoreWeave reports better sales and operating income than any analyst anticipated; revenue backlog swells above $55 billion

CoreWeave reported a strong sales beat in Q3, with bottom-line results to match.

  • Revenue: $1.36 billion (compared to analyst estimates of $1.23 billion and guidance for $1.26 billion to $1.30 billion)

  • Adjusted operating income: $217.15 million (estimate: $177.2 million, guidance: $160 million to $190 million)

Those figures exceeded every estimate among analysts polled by Bloomberg. And more strong sales seem to be in the pipeline: CoreWeave’s revenue backlog swelled to $55.6 billion at the end of the quarter, nearly double the $30.1 billion at the end of Q2.

If there’s a fly in the ointment, it’s that CoreWeave seems to be having a little trouble getting as much compute up and running as Wall Street had hoped for, with active power of 590 megawatts at the end of the quarter, while analysts were anticipating nearly 625 megawatts.

When I look at this chart of CoreWeave’s revenue backlog, and in particular how much is slated to be realized within the next 24 months, all I can think is, “That’s got to mean a lot of capex. And power.”

CoreWeave revenue backlog
Source: CoreWeave Q3 earnings presentation

The neocloud had a busy quarter, reaching a $14 billion pact with Meta for AI compute, expanding its agreement with OpenAI, and signing a $6.3 billion deal with Nvidia for any unused cloud computing capacity, among others. CoreWeave’s recent attempt at vertical integration failed, as Core Scientific shareholders voted overwhelmingly against its proposed acquisition on October 30.

However, there’s much less drama around this quarter’s results than the last one. That’s because its lock-up period expired shortly after CoreWeave’s impressive Q2 results, catalyzing a wave of profit taking in the AI darling.

markets

Rigetti Computing reports mixed Q3 results; shares fall

Rigetti Computing reported sales a bit shy of estimates along with a modestly smaller-than-expected loss.

For Q3, the quantum computing firm posted:

  • Revenue: $1.9 million (compared to an analyst consensus estimate of $2.17 million)

  • Adjusted earnings per share: -$0.03 (estimate: -$0.05)

The prospect of government support has been a major catalyst for the quantum space in recent months, including the US government deeming the technology an R&D priority, which was followed by a report that the Trump administration was in talks to accumulate equity stakes in Rigetti and its peers. That report, however, was quickly contradicted by separate reports.

Rigetti more than tripled from early September to its mid-October closing peak of $56.34, but has since sunk to the low $30s as the air comes out of many speculative, thematic pockets of the market.

markets

Plug Power reports modestly positive Q3 results after topsy-turvy session

Plug Power is little changed in after-hours trading after posting Q3 results a bit ahead of estimates.

The on-again, off-again meme stock and hydrogen fuel cell company reported:

  • Revenue: $177.1 million (compared to estimates for $175.05 million)

  • Adjusted earnings per share: -$0.12 (estimate: -$0.13)

In its Q2 results, Plug has set a goal of achieving gross margin breakeven on a run-rate basis as an exit rate for Q4 2025 (that is, ending the quarter in a position where revenues at least equal the cost of goods sold). This goal was not reiterated in the press release for Q3.

Plug popped double digits in premarket trading earlier today after announcing that it “has signed a non-binding Letter of Intent to monetize its electricity rights in New York and one other location and collaborate with a US data center developer.” However, that news was apparently overshadowed by another tidbit in the release: that Plug would be abandoning its pursuit of a $1.7 billion loan guarantee from the US Department of Energy (and along with it, projects that would have boosted its hydrogen production).

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.