Tesla bull on Trump-Musk brawl: “Jaw dropping and a shock to the market”
It’s another “Twilight Zone” moment.
Tesla super-bull and Wedbush Securities equity analyst Dan Ives is, as always, quick draw McGraw with his reaction to this afternoon’s bizarre, highly public political breakup between the world’s richest man, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and the world’s most powerful man, US President Donald Trump.
He writes:
“The quickly deteriorating friendship and now ‘major beef’ between Musk and Trump is jaw dropping and a shock to the market and putting major fear for Tesla investors on what is ahead. This situation between Musk and Trump could start to settle down and the friendship continues but this must start to be calmed down on the Musk and Trump fronts and it's not good for either side.
This feud does not change our bullish view of Tesla and the autonomous view but clearly does put a fly in the ointment of the Trump regulatory framework going forward. It’s another Twilight Zone moment in this Musk/Trump relationship which now is quickly moving downhill.”
Ives expounds on the idea that the “Trump regulatory framework” could be in jeopardy as a result of today’s events, saying investors are now concerned that it could “change the regulatory environment for Tesla on the autonomous front over the coming years under the Trump Administration.” (Translation: investors expected the administration to ease regulation of self-driving cars to Tesla’s benefit.)
This is the closest I’ve seen to someone on Wall Street laying out the rationale of many investors in so-called Trump trades — stocks like Tesla that soared after Trump won the 2024 election. One category of Trump trades, which includes Taser maker Axon Enterprise and deportation contractor and private prison operator GEO Group, were simply expected to generate more government business due to Trump administration policies.
But another set of companies were, in some cases, bets that personal, political, and/or financial connections with the administration could produce favorable outcomes in terms of government policy.
As I’ve said before, that’s a pretty decent definition of corruption. But just for the record, now that Musk has joined the resistance, it should go without saying that government efforts to punish him or his companies for public criticism of the president would also meet that description.