Markets
Data Center
(Nathan Howard/Getty Images)

The nuclear-powered AI data-center trade roars into a new year

1/3/25 5:02PM

It’s early going, but so far the trade of the year is clearly another big bet on an ongoing boom in an AI-related investment.

Just check out the top gainers of the S&P 500 in the first two days of 2025 trading.

Nuke stocks Vistra and Constellation Energy — the second- and 10th-best peformers in the index last year — exploded out of the gates amid rising expectations of growing demand from power-hungry data centers.

Giant landowner Texas Pacific Land, which traditionally leased its massive holdings of West Texas land for oil and gas drilling but has recently talked up the potential for slapping up data centers, comes next.

Then embattled server-hardware maker Super Micro Computer, another nuke stock NRG, the Magnificient 7’s Nvidia, renewables and power-generation firm GE Vernova, disk-drive maker Western Digital, a newly enlivened Uber, and finally Micron. We could go on, with the next tier of top performers including more tech, AI, and energy-related firms like First Solar, Enphase Energy, and Palantir.

For what it’s worth, there are plenty of reasons to believe that this bet on the continued boom in AI investment is pretty much a sure thing.

For instance, Friday Microsoft said it was going to spend $80 billion to build AI data centers in fiscal 2025 alone. That can buy a lot of chips.

But from a slightly longer-term perspective, nervous Nellies can’t help but wonder whether such a single-minded investment mania might be setting up the US economy — and potentially the markets — for the mother of all malinvestment cycles, akin to or perhaps worse than the tech-stock boom of the late 1990s that turned into a gnarly stock-market bust by 2001. But that’s all ancient history.

This time is, of course, completely different.

More Markets

See all Markets
Western Digital Seagate Technology Rise to top of S&P 500

Data storage is so hot right now

A rapid turnaround in profitability helps explain how Seagate Technology and Western Digital have clawed to the top of S&P 500 this year.

markets

Why Apple usually falls on a new iPhone launch

You can only shock the world so many times, and a thinner phone with a better camera isn’t always going to cut it.

That, in short, is why Apple has tended to go down on days when it’s introduced a new iPhone to the world, as this great chart from Bespoke Investment Group shows:

Bespoke iPhone announcement Apple performance
Source: Bespoke Investment Group

On average, the tech giant falls 0.4% on the release date and is negative more than 70% of the time, perhaps a useful tidbit on this, the day of the iPhone 17 launch.

One more thing....

A potentially complicating factor to the aforementioned data is that Apple has often done quite well in the six months leading up to a new iPhone announcement, roughly 5 percentage points better than its typical six-month return, as shown above. That’s not the case this time, with Apple shares up about 5% over the past six months compared to a typical near 20% advance in the prelude to a new iPhone drop.

So it’s not like expectations about how big of a catalyst this can be for the company are sky-high and due for a sharp retrenchment, especially given Apple’s relatively lackluster progress in developing AI capabilities relative to its megacap tech peers. But a seemingly low bar to clear hasn’t necessarily been a boon for the company on the big day, either.

In any event, staring too closely at the minutiae of all this may be missing the forest for the trees.

“While this info may be helpful to traders, we doubt its something that long-term shareholders are too worried about given the huge compounding returns the stock has provided during the iPhone era,” Bespoke wrote.

markets

Planet Labs slips after big post-earnings gain

Smallish midcap satellite imagery and data company Planet Labs is giving back a chunk of the nearly 50% gain it racked up after posting earnings early Monday.

No tears, though: the shares, which seem to have a fairly robust retail following, are still up roughly 340% over the past 12 months.

markets

CoreWeave soars as Microsoft’s deal with Nebius shows unrelenting demand for AI compute

CoreWeave is soaring as Microsoft’s $17.4 billion deal with Nebius shows the immense value and continued demand for all parts of the AI data center ecosystem.

One additional reason for CoreWeave’s jump may be that its pending acquisition of AI data center infrastructure company Core Scientific looks like a great deal compared to Microsoft’s renting of (more broad and advanced) AI data center capacity from Nebius.

CoreWeave’s all-stock deal to buy Core Scientific was initially valued at ~$9 billion, but with the subsequent decline in its shares, it’s worth about 40% less. And in purchasing Core Scientific, CoreWeave is saving $10 billion in what it would have paid the company to lease data center infrastructure over the next 12 years.

As it stands, Microsoft is getting about 300 megawatts in data center power capacity from Nebius, while Core Scientific boasts that its footprint is in excess of 1,300 megawatts. So, on the surface, it looks like an absolute steal for CoreWeave.

But again, this is not an apples-to-apples comparison; not all access to AI computing infrastructure is created equal.

There are differences in the type of AI infrastructure provided by the two: Nebius owns GPUs, while Core Scientific doesn’t, and what it provides in the software layer isn’t offered by Core Scientific as a stand-alone entity. This is the difference between the “full stack” approach (Nebius) and a “colocation” approach (Core Scientific).

That being said, CoreWeave’s acquisition of Core Scientific, once completed, will make the combined entity’s business model look more like Nebius’ model, which, as Microsoft just told us, is something that top hyperscalers are willing to pay a pretty penny for.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.