Markets
Canada's Wonderland in Vaughan, Canada
The Leviathan roller coaster (Gary Hershorn/Getty Images)

The recovery in US stocks is all thanks to the riskiest kinds of companies

Earnings variability, volatility, and trading activity rule the roost.

Luke Kawa

The massive recovery in US stocks since reciprocal tariffs were announced is as clear a sign as any that risk appetite is back.

But just how much have traders been willing to dump or embrace risk during the S&P 500’s descent from all-time highs and swift bounce back?

Factor portfolios are a useful way to track the tale of the tape in this regard, and Bloomberg has a hefty collection of US-specific long/short factor portfolios that group stocks based on certain attributes: value, momentum, profitability, earnings variability, size, and so on.

All of these portfolios are designed to be market neutral, meaning their price action shouldn’t be driven by what the overall stock market is doing, but rather the unique characteristics of each factor.

The initial leg downward in stocks from when the S&P 500 reached an all-time high on February 19 was, unquestionably, a momentum-centric downturn. Momentum cratered, and traders sought safety in companies that were cheap, profitable, or had good dividend yields. After March 10, momentum came roaring back and high-dividend stocks slumped (as longer-term US bond yields drifted higher, which tends to reduce the relative appeal of companies that pay back their shareholders in this manner).

But focusing on which factors have led since the S&P 500’s 2025 low on April 8 is a veritable who’s who of the riskiest types of stocks; high volatility, high trading activity, and earnings variability are the top three. That comports with what we know about retail traders flexing their muscles through this maelstrom, no doubt.

Some of the stocks that are longs in all three portfolios include Tesla, Strategy, Dell, and AppLovin.

Which raises the question: is it inherently risky when stocks like this are leading the market?

Well, during the current bull market (which we’ll still say we’re in until proven otherwise!), we have scant instances of these three factors all being atop the leaderboard for most of a two-week period. Once was in late 2023, which coincided with/was followed by a brief hiccup for the overall market before the S&P 500 roared in the first quarter of the next year. The other came earlier, in February 2023, and was followed by one of your run-of-the-mill 5% to 10% pullbacks for the broad market.

Certainly nothing conclusive, but it does get the antennae up just a little.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Lucid cuts 12% of its US workforce in a profitability push

EV maker Lucid announced on Friday it is laying off 12% of its US workforce as part of its efforts to improve profitability.

This is Lucid’s third round of layoffs since March 2023. At the end of 2024, the company said it had 6,800 employees globally.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

markets

The Supreme Court’s tariff ruling isn’t sweeping relief for automakers, but it isn’t nothing either

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a significant chunk of President Trump’s tariffs, but the decision isn’t a cause for automakers to fully exhale.

Friday’s ruling relates to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and not Section 232. The 25% tariffs on automobiles and auto parts were imposed under Section 232, so those tariffs remain in place.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

markets

Nvidia nears $30 billion investment in OpenAI’s funding round, the FT reports

Nvidia is close to investing $30 billion in OpenAI as part of its long-discussed funding round, per the Financial Times.

Bloomberg had previously reported that Nvidia would be investing $20 billion in this round.

The FT says that this investment will effectively be replacing a bigger planned pact between the two companies. The Wall Street Journal had originally reported in late January that Nvidia’s investment of up to $100 billion in OpenAI, which was announced in September, had “stalled” amid private criticisms of the ChatGPT maker by CEO Jensen Huang.

As Microsoft, SoftBank, or Oracle could tell you, being viewed as overly exposed to OpenAI has not been a boon for stocks in recent months.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.