Markets
XPO Logistics
Truck from XPO Logistics, one of Brad Jacobs' companies (Paul Weaver/Getty Images)

What happens when a boring holding company accidentally becomes a meme stock

Low-float industrial roll-up holding companies are clearly where it’s at in 2024.

7/25/24 2:54PM

Brad Jacobs is a serial entrepreneur who has made “a few billion dollars” building different industrial and logistics companies, such as XPO Logistics, United Rentals, and United Waste Systems. Last December, he invested $1 billion ($900 million from his own private equity shop, and $100 million from Sequoia) in a ~$20 million market cap company, SilverSun Technologies.

The reason for the investment was that Jacobs wanted to create a publicly listed shell company to acquire companies in the building-products distribution market to build a multibillion-dollar industrial roll-up, and the fastest way to create a publicly listed shell company was, from his perspective, to add $1 billion to the balance sheet of a tiny company, pay the existing shareholders of the tiny company a $17.5 million dividend (up from an initially-planned $2.5 million), and manage the newly-capitalized, publicly traded “company” with $1 billion of cash and the operations of the existing entity, which provides technology solutions primarily to companies in manufacturing, distribution and service sectors.

At first glance, Jacobs’ investment resembles a SPAC. SPACs, which exploded in popularity in 2020, are shell companies that raise money from investors, IPO, then look for private companies to “take public” through reverse mergers. However, in a Yahoo Finance interview from December, Jacobs was critical of the incentive structure of SPACs:

I don't like SPACs, from the point of view of I don't know that there's a real fair alignment between the promoter, so to speak, and the investors. They don't put any money in usually. And they get 20% off the top. What I'm doing is something very different. We're actually putting-- we're putting our money where our mouth is. We're putting a dollar billion into a very small-cap company. It was $15 or $20 million market cap as of a few days ago.

And then we're going to spin back that company to its legacy shareholders. We're going to give them a little dividend, $2.5 million. We're going to give them a little taste of the new company, like less than half a percent. Then we'll be left with a publicly traded company with a billion of cash in it. And we're off to the races.

So he opted for the derivative of a SPAC: instead of raising $1 billion to find a private company to take public, he invested $1 billion in an already-public company and used it to find other private companies to roll up in his already-public company. (Since that interview, management decided not to spin off SilverSun).

Anyway, there was a lot of institutional demand to invest in Jacobs’ new venture, and in June, he announced that he had raised an additional $3.5 billion, at double the price per share of his initial investment, and earlier this week, Jacobs raised another $620 million, at the same share price as the last fundraise, including $150 million from Jared Kushner. All in all, the “company” will have approximately $5 billion in cash on its balance sheet once the funding deals close, with approximately 740 million shares outstanding (~671 million shares from the first two funding rounds, including warrants, as well as 68 million shares from the latest round).

Jacobs’ and Sequoia’s shares were priced at $4.57 per share (with some warrants priced higher), while the later investors got their shares for twice that price: $9.14 per share. QXO is currently trading at $90.01 per share, up more than 3x from its price before Jacobs’ deal (adjusted for a reverse split), meaning this shell company with $5 billion cash is worth approximately $70 billion, and its stock price has moved back and forth between $40 and $240 per share since Jacobs announced his initial investment. It turns out that Jacobs’ new book, “How to Make a Few Billion Dollars” may be the most apt book title of the year.

What’s up with the insane price movement? While QXO has raised billions, the only shares currently trading on the market are the ~660,000 shares held by the original SilverSun shareholders (as noted in Jacobs’ initial announcement, SilverSun shareholders would retain 0.15% of the new company), so the supply is really low for an investment that is, obviously, really hot (even institutional investors paid a 100% premium to Jacobs’ price!). As a result, daily trading volume has only surpassed 100,000 shares three times in 2024, making the stock susceptible to wild price swings.

This is not investment advice, and I think anyone can do what they want with their money, but paying $90 per share to invest in a shell company that everyone else paid $9.14 to invest in doesn’t seem like a great deal!

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Walmart hits all-time high following Bank of America boosting its price target

Walmart shares touched an intraday all-time record of $106.11 before settling lower for the close, missing its previous record closing price of $105.05 on February 13 of this year.

The rally came after Bank of America lifted its price target on Walmart to $125 from $120 and stuck with its “buy” rating. Analysts said Walmart is emerging as a leader in “agentic AI commerce,” pointing to its GenAI assistant, Sparky, which offers occasion-based recommendations and help shoppers plan, compare, and buy products.

Analysts also flagged Walmart’s sheer scale, backed by data from 180 million customers, and its fast-growing delivery business as major competitive advantages. Beyond AI, the fundamentals are catching eyes, too. Walmart’s food delivery arm is already profitable, reaching 95% of US households within three hours and a quarter of customers in under 30 minutes.

The note also highlighted Walmart’s cushion against tariffs, since two-thirds of its products are sourced domestically, and pointed to its new Synchrony Financial-backed credit card as another way to juice membership growth.

The stock is up over 16% year to date and has more than doubled since 2020.

markets

Federal Reserve cuts rates by 0.25%, signals 50 basis points of additional easing by year-end

The Federal Reserve cut interest rates for the first time this year, lowering its policy rate to a range of 4.25% to 4.5%, as anticipated.

The “dot plot” from the Summary of Economic Projections shows the median Fed official thinks it will be appropriate for the policy rate to end this year at 3.625% (expected 3.875%) and 3.375% in 2026 (expected 3.375%) if the economy evolves in line with their expectations.

Stocks slid during Fed Chair Jay Powell’s press conference, where he described the reduction as a “risk-management cut,” didn’t rule out that the US economy might still warrant restrictive monetary policy, and signaled there was not wide support for a larger 50-basis point cut at this meeting.

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF, which was up nearly 2.5% at the highs, fell into negative territory before rebounding. The SPDR S&P 500 ETF traded down as much as 0.9% before paring those losses to end up right around where it was when the rate cut was announced.

The US central bank raised its forecast for how high core PCE inflation will be next year to 2.6% from 2.4% in June, which heavily implies that monetary policymakers are willing to look through the near-term inflationary impulse from tariffs and that softening job growth has assumed more prominence in their decision-making process.

There was only one dissent: newly added Fed Governor Stephen Miran, who favored a 50-basis point cut at this meeting and appears to be the outlier Fed official who thinks the policy rate should end the year at 2.875%.

Palantir Ontology

What the heck is Palantir’s “Ontology”?

This obscure philosophical term is the key to the company’s AI business.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.