Markets

Market Theory

IT’S NOT THE ECONOMY

“Upon closer inspection ... this link is murky.”

Money in fist
Getty Images

So why do we care about the stock market?

What we talk about when we talk about stocks.


If you read business news, you hear it constantly. 

  • “The S&P 500 has been on a tear since Nov. 1, rallying some 20% on the back of strong earnings, economic optimism, and... ” (WSJ)

  • “The U.S. stock market is off to a soaring start in 2024, as optimism over the economy and interest rate cuts has combined with... ” (Reuters)

  • Optimism about the U.S. economy sends stocks to a new record... ” (NPR)

A lot of what gets written about the stock market assumes a clear connection between rising price in the equity market and an improving economy.

I’ve been covering financial markets for 15 years at The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Axios, and a few other spots. I’ve probably included the same implicit logic in stories hundreds of times.

But here’s the thing. It’s really not true.

For a century now — since the Wall Street boom of the 1920s — Americans have conflated the market with the economy, in a mass socio-cultural confusion of correlation and causation.

It started as a freak of history. In the 1920s, the US economy surged as America emerged from World War I as the world’s top economic power.

At the same time, the stock market saw a massive boom unlike any before. Using another new technology, modern advertising techniques, Wall Street managed to persuade Americans — many of whom were enjoying the novel experience of having a little extra cash in their pockets — to buy stocks for the first time. It worked. The 1920s bull market was born. 

Then came the Crash of ’29, followed by the Great Depression, a one-two punch that strengthened the linkage between the fate of the economy and the path of the market in the American psyche. 

The thing is, economists have looked for ironclad proof that the stock market has some sort of relationship to the economy for years. They’ve largely come up short.

One of the most widely cited surveys papers, summing up all the economic literature on the ability of financial market movements to predict economic growth, said that while economists have often noted some sort of link between stocks and growth, “upon closer inspection, however, this link is murky.”

“Stock returns generally do not have substantial… predictive content for future output,” said the paper, published in the American Economic Association’s Journal of Economic Literature in 2003. 

A separate 2010 paper by a bunch of well-known economists looking at the predictive power of a range of financial indicators found that the stock market “outperformed” other indicators in prediction, but none of their indicators were especially great. 

OK, so maybe markets don’t predict growth. That’s somewhat inconvenient, seeing as they’re widely credited with being “forward-looking.” But maybe they simply reflect economic growth in real time? 

Nope, not according to a 2005 paper in the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, which actually found a negative relationship between actual economic growth and investment returns, in a long-term study of 19 countries. That means they found stocks typically rose when the economy worsened, and vice versa.

So where does this leave us? If the stock market doesn’t tell us about the economy, does the stock market matter? Are we giving stocks too much attention? Does the market really matter?

That’s sort of like asking if sports matter. They do. Not to everybody. Not all the time.

But if you find them fascinating; if you’re interested in strategy and competition; if you have a particular rooting interest; if you’re interested in human behavior, or in mass psychology, or new trends, or great stories, they matter.

And let’s just be honest. Sports also matter to a lot of people who gamble on them. They can cost you — or make you — money. The US does have a record high share of households, 58%, who own stocks. (On the other hand, the vast majority of those holdings are pretty small. More than 90% of the stock owned by households belongs to the richest 10% of American families.)

So yes, the markets matter. Not because they’re some magic barometer that can tell the economic future. But because they’re an incredibly rich source of information and great stories about the world right now.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Space stocks rise and shine in early trading

AST SpaceMobile, RocketLab, and Planet Labs were all up early Monday, despite little news linked specifically to these — all money-losing — space launch and satellite services that have become popular among the retail trading crowd.

More broadly, however, there is report of a big merger of satellite businesses operated by European aerospace and defense giants Airbus, Thales, and Leonardo in order to create a European satellite monopoly.

The new satellite entity would be aimed in part at reducing European reliance on Elon Musk’s privately held SpaceX, as Musk has come to be seen as an capricious and unreliable partner as a result of his flirtation with international far-right politics and his posture toward Ukraine.

While it’s a bit of a bank shot, some of the upstart companies like RocketLab — which have also positioned themselves as a SpaceX alternative — may be up on the theory that what’s bad for Musk and SpaceX may well be good for them.

The new satellite entity would be aimed in part at reducing European reliance on Elon Musk’s privately held SpaceX, as Musk has come to be seen as an capricious and unreliable partner as a result of his flirtation with international far-right politics and his posture toward Ukraine.

While it’s a bit of a bank shot, some of the upstart companies like RocketLab — which have also positioned themselves as a SpaceX alternative — may be up on the theory that what’s bad for Musk and SpaceX may well be good for them.

markets

United States Antimony soars after proposed acquisition of Australian miner Larvotto Resources

United States Antimony Corp. is up after revealing a proposal to purchase Australian miner Larvotto Resources in an all-stock deal.

US Antimony has already acquired 10% of the company in the open market.

Larvotto is planning on developing Australia’s largest deposit of antimony, a metalloid that’s used in ammunition, batteries, and certain semiconductor products. Antimony is not a rare earth, but is considered strategically important and its production has been dominated by China.

“Our proposal to combine with Larvotto reflects our deep commitment to build a world class industry player in the critical minerals space and our strong conviction in the strategic and cultural fit between the two organizations as well as our countries,” Chairman and CEO Gary Evans said. “We see this as a compelling opportunity for Larvotto shareholders to participate in the upside of a larger, more diversified group — one with financial strength, global reach, and top tier technical capabilities.”

US Antimony has rallied strongly in recent months as the US government began to accumulate equity positions in critical minerals producers and investors tried to identify future potential targets for government investment. Those gains kicked into high gear last week after JPMorgan announced plans to invest billions in critical minerals and other industries key to America’s economic security and resiliency.

William Blair analyst Neal Dingmann initiated coverage of USAC with an “outperform” rating on Monday, suggesting that the US government may also take a position in the firm, per Bloomberg.

markets

Rivian drops on a downgrade and lowered price target from Mizuho amid weaker expected EV sales

Analysts are beginning to have doubts about US demand for EVs next year, following the expiration of the $7,500 tax credit.

Shares of Rivian dropped in premarket trading on Monday, following a downgrade of the stock from Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh from “neutral” to “underperform.” Rakesh also lowered his price target for Rivian from $14 to $10.

Looking ahead, Mizuho expects Rivian to deliver 60,000 vehicles in 2026. That’s about 38% above the EV maker’s current top target for this year, but still significantly below the 71,000 delivery consensus estimate of analysts polled by FactSet.

markets

Beyond Meat surges on heavy volume as retail traders position for a squeeze in the embattled plant-based meat company

Shares of Beyond Meat are soaring in early trading on Monday, with retail traders hoping for a turnaround — or more realistically, a powerful short squeeze — as the embattled plant-based meat producer scrambles to raise cash to protect its viability.

As of 7:15 a.m. ET, more money had changed hands trading the faux meat firm in the premarket than the likes of Apple, Microsoft, or Palantir.

Bloomberg Most Traded Stocks in US as of 7:15 a.m. ET
Source: Bloomberg

The stock cratered to an all-time low of $0.50 last Thursday after management completed a deal with nearly 97% of the holders of more than $1 billion in senior convertible notes due in 2027 (with a coupon of zero) to exchange those for $196 million in second lien notes due in 2030 (with a coupon of 7%) and more than 316 million shares, a massive dilution of existing shareholders that raised the company’s share count by more than 300%. Those noteholders are now far and away the biggest holders of the company’s equity.

A former Reddit user (who since appears to have been banned from the platform) with the handle capybaraSTOCKS appears to be at the genesis of this newfound wave of optimism surrounding the stock. The user has purportedly since moved to YouTube and says they own 4% of the company. They posted a video on Sunday explaining their thesis, including progress on the company reducing its debt load, its brand value, and the potential for a short squeeze.

“High community interest, social media buzz, and most importantly a near 500 million shares traded volume on Friday” suggest “Beyond is now entering meme stock territory,” per the video.

The stock was among the most highly shorted US companies heading into the month, with over half its shares sold short, per Bloomberg data. That number likely came down meaningfully in the short term thanks to the issuance of over 316 million shares as part of the aforementioned debt-for-equity-and-other-debt swap last week, which saw those who took the company up on its plans temporarily barred from transferring beneficial ownership or selling a large portion of the new shares.

Bull with Nose Ring

US stocks end volatile week on a positive note

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 both ended well in the green, while the Russell 2000 suffered a loss.

Toby Bochan10/17/25

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.