Power
Google I/O 2024
(Christoph Dernbach/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Hey Google!

Antitrust expert: here’s what’s going to happen to Google next

Google will probably have to ditch its exclusive iPhone agreement, but won’t get broken up.

It’s official: Google is a monopoly. 

You can read the full ruling here, but the main finding from US District Judge Amit Mehta’s ruling Monday was, “Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,”.

Cornell University economics and law professor and antitrust expert George Hay also simplified it for us:

“It's 280 pages, but when you cut through all the mumbo jumbo it’s very simple: Google has a monopoly power in searches, and they monetize that with search text advertising, and they make a lot of money,” he told Sherwood. “How do they keep their monopoly? The answer is, they have exclusive agreements with Apple and the Android manufacturers to be the default engine.”

Here are some key takeaways:

It sure appears like the court will make Google get rid of its exclusive search agreements

Since this is a bifurcated trial, we’ll have to wait for a second trial to learn what the remedies will be and that will likely take years and years, Hay said, but it will likely involve the court ordering Google to do away with its search agreements with browsers and phone makers.

Through the trial it was revealed that Google paid Apple $20 billion to be the default search engine on the default web browser for iPhones. 

Google estimated in 2020 it could lose up to 80% of its Apple search volume if it gave up its default position, which could translate into up to nearly $33 billion in net revenue.

"You could get rid of Chrome and put in something else, but almost no one does,” Hay said. “The result is that they continue to be dominant, and no one is really going to crack their market share."

Google probably won’t get broken up

Despite some lawmakers calling for Google to be broken up, that probably won’t happen, Hay said.

“Historically, there aren't that many monopoly cases, and courts have very, very rarely ever used an antitrust case to break up a company. It just doesn’t happen.”

Google Search doesn’t have to be good to make money

Google knew it could make search “significantly” worse without losing revenue, according to an internal degradation study conducted in 2020.

"The fact that Google makes product changes without concern that its users might go elsewhere is something only a firm with monopoly power could do,” Mehta wrote.

Microsoft might have the most to gain

Microsoft’s Bing search engine would be the best positioned to scoop up a default search agreement with Apple if Google was forced out of its agreement, said Adam Kovacevich, a former Google executive who now serves as CEO of Chamber of Progress, a Big Tech-funded trade group.

Apple testified at the trial that it was not looking to create its own search engine business. If a court disqualifies Google from renewing that deal, Microsoft could be a lone bidder and snag it at a low price. 

“How do you force consumers not to prefer Google?” Kovacevich said. 


Bing, Google’s largest search competitor, is still a fraction of its size. In 2021, Google made $146 billion of search while Bing made less than $12 billion in 2022. Bing has about 6% market share, compared to Google’s 90%. 

More Power

See all Power
power

US regulators reportedly appear likely to approve Paramount’s Warner Bros. acquisition

US antitrust regulators appear to be leaning toward approval of Paramount’s $110 billion acquisition of rival Warner Bros. Discovery, according to a Semafor report.

The DOJ’s apparent positive analysis of the Hollywood megamerger follows a Tuesday meeting between Paramount CEO David Ellison and DOJ staffers including acting antitrust chief Omeed Assefi.

Per Semafor, that meeting included a significant number of questions about the would-be streaming giant’s theatrical release priorities. Ellison has pledged to release a “minimum” of 30 films for theaters between Paramount and WBD upon completion of the merger, and to maintain a 45-day theatrical window for films, followed by a three-month SVOD (digital rent or purchase) period before they land on Paramount+.

The DOJ has not yet approved the merger, and the agency’s current apparent analysis could shift.

It’s unclear what other topics were discussed at Tuesday’s meeting. Hollywood insiders critical of a Warner Bros. acquisition have also highlighted that any merger decreasing the number of content buyers would squeeze an already depressed entertainment labor market.

Per Semafor, that meeting included a significant number of questions about the would-be streaming giant’s theatrical release priorities. Ellison has pledged to release a “minimum” of 30 films for theaters between Paramount and WBD upon completion of the merger, and to maintain a 45-day theatrical window for films, followed by a three-month SVOD (digital rent or purchase) period before they land on Paramount+.

The DOJ has not yet approved the merger, and the agency’s current apparent analysis could shift.

It’s unclear what other topics were discussed at Tuesday’s meeting. Hollywood insiders critical of a Warner Bros. acquisition have also highlighted that any merger decreasing the number of content buyers would squeeze an already depressed entertainment labor market.

President Trump Hosts Crypto Summit At The White House

Report: White House AI oversight executive order DOA

After weeks of uncertainty, the White House’s plan to review frontier models before release appears dead.

Jon Keegan5/22/26
power
Jon Keegan

Report: White House informed AI companies about plans for government to vet new models

After weeks of uncertainty about what role if any the White House would play in overseeing the release of new foundation models, this week top AI companies have been briefed on its plans, according to a new report from The Information.

The planned executive order describes a voluntary plan in which the National Security Agency, Office of the National Cyber Director, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency will decide which models to review, per the report.

The plan is reportedly less strict than AI companies had feared, but it does call for a 90-day testing period before release, a window that is substantially longer than the 14-day window that the companies wanted.

The new order could be signed as soon as this week.

The planned executive order describes a voluntary plan in which the National Security Agency, Office of the National Cyber Director, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency will decide which models to review, per the report.

The plan is reportedly less strict than AI companies had feared, but it does call for a 90-day testing period before release, a window that is substantially longer than the 14-day window that the companies wanted.

The new order could be signed as soon as this week.

power
Rani Molla

Pension leaders overseeing more than $1 trillion in assets call SpaceX’s corporate structure “extreme”

SpaceX is gearing up for what is expected to be the biggest IPO in history — a $75 billion raise at a record $1.75 trillion valuation. But some of Wall Street’s biggest whales aren’t happy with the plan.

Leaders from three of the largest US public pension systems — New York State, New York City, and California — sent a letter to CEO Elon Musk on Wednesday, calling out the company’s planned corporate structure as extreme and the “most management-favorable governance structure ever brought to the US public markets at ⁠this scale.”

Among their concerns: Musk’s inviolability since only he can remove himself as CEO, the elimination of class-action lawsuits, and a Texas shield that could require a staggering 3% of outstanding stock just to file a derivative suit.

While the group has requested a meeting with Musk, it’s not clear if the $1 trillion they oversee is enough to force Musk to entertain their demands. These funds may be caught in an index trap.” As passive benchmark trackers, they’ll be forced to buy the stock once it lists, stripping them of any boycott leverage. And with a tiny ~5% float and the expected massive demand from retail and other investors, Musk may be able to ignore a few whales.

power
Rani Molla

Nvidia, Tesla, Apple, Micron CEOs head to China with Trump

Executives from some of America’s biggest companies, including Apple, Tesla, and Boeing, are joining President Trump on his trip to China this week to help facilitate trade and investment between the countries. After a last-minute invite, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who was initially snubbed, is also part of a trip aimed, in part, at resolving a prolonged import-export standoff between China and the US regarding AI and semiconductor technology.

Meta President and Vice Chairman Dina Powell McCormick is also going. Recently China blew up one of Meta’s major AI bets by unwinding the company’s acquisition of AI agent startup Manus.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the group was journeying to China to ask President Xi to “‘open up’ China so that these brilliant people can work their magic, and help bring the People’s Republic to an even higher level!”

He added, “I have never seen or heard of any idea that would be more beneficial to our incredible Countries!”

Here’s the full list of company executives, per Reuters:

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.