Tech
An Amazon Web Services data center is shown situated near single-family homes on July 17, 2024 in Stone Ridge, Virginia
An Amazon Web Services data center in Stone Ridge, Virginia (Nathan Howard/Getty Images)
power hungry

AI data centers are devouring our energy and propping up fossil fuels

A new report finds the explosive growth of AI data centers is consuming a disproportionate amount of our energy generation.

Jon Keegan

The rush to build ever-larger, power-hungry data centers is a drag on America’s progress toward clean energy. And there’s no sign of things slowing down.

Earlier this month, Amazon announced it will be investing $11 billion to build out AI data centers in Georgia, and Microsoft announced it will be spending $80 billion on data centers around the world in FY 2025.

A new report from think tank Frontier Group, public research group US PIRG, and Environment America details this massive power consumption by the data centers leading the AI revolution and cryptocurrency.

The report highlights some startling data that illustrates the massive gap between power supply and demand.

Insatiable demand

In the states where tech giants have been pouring billions of dollars to rapidly build computing infrastructure for AI, the data centers are devouring huge percentages of each state’s power generation.

Virginia, which is home to a huge number of data centers, expended more than a quarter of the state’s total electricity generation to such data centers in 2023. For comparison, in 14 other states, less than 1% of the state electricity generated went to data centers, according to the report.

Another issue highlighted by the report is the huge variance in estimates for future power consumption forecasts. Analysts’ forecasts for growth of electricity demand from 2023 to 2030 varied between 29% to 166%, leaving states with no easy way to ensure enough supply.

Prolonging the use of fossil fuels

The study identified at least 17 fossil-fuel-fired power plants in five states that have moved to delay their phaseouts due to surging demand from data centers. The report identified new fossil fuel plants being planned to help meet demand with at least 10,808 MW of power, all which slow the country’s progress toward transitioning to renewable energy generation.

The report examined the impact on communities adjacent to these supersized data centers and found many significant impacts. The massive use of community water supply, noise pollution, and soaring energy price increases that get passed on to consumers were just some of the impacts.

Negligible societal benefits

The authors included several recommendations to address the concerns raised in the study. Among the recommendations is greater transparency from the tech companies that build these data centers, to better understand energy and water use by the facilities. Other suggestions include requiring new data centers to include on-site renewable energy sources, eliminating public subsidies for data centers, and a deprioritization of computing resources that produce “negligible societal benefits.”

President Trump’s executive order this week titled “Unleashing American Energy” doesn’t contain much to indicate that any of these recommendations will be implemented at a federal level, at least. The administration has made clear that it seeks to streamline the permitting and approvals to generate significantly more cheap energy to power the large AI infrastructure projects its supporting, such as the new $500 billion “Project Stargate” joint venture between Oracle, OpenAI, SoftBank, and its partner Nvidia.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

SpaceX filings reportedly show no one can fire Elon Musk except Elon Musk

The only thing stopping Elon Musk from being chairman and CEO of SpaceX is Elon Musk, according to Reuters, which viewed an excerpt of the company’s IPO filing.

The document outlines a dual-class share structure giving Musk control via super-voting stock. The filing says he “can only be removed from our board or these positions by the vote of Class B holders” — shares he’ll control after the listing. It adds that if he keeps those shares, he could “continue to control the election and removal of a majority of our board.”

At a typical public company — even founder-led ones with dual-class structures — a CEO can be fired by the board of directors, which represents shareholders and can vote to remove them over issues such as corporate performance, strategy, or misconduct.

The unusual SpaceX setup means Musk is unlikely to face the kind of CEO succession pressure he’s dealt with at Tesla. Musk, of course, is not a typical CEO, and the value of his companies has long been closely tied to his presence.

To be sure, SpaceXs confidential IPO filing isnt in its final form yet — while the filing is still in the confidential phase, the company will be going back and forth with the SEC, which will review it and suggest or require changes.

At a typical public company — even founder-led ones with dual-class structures — a CEO can be fired by the board of directors, which represents shareholders and can vote to remove them over issues such as corporate performance, strategy, or misconduct.

The unusual SpaceX setup means Musk is unlikely to face the kind of CEO succession pressure he’s dealt with at Tesla. Musk, of course, is not a typical CEO, and the value of his companies has long been closely tied to his presence.

To be sure, SpaceXs confidential IPO filing isnt in its final form yet — while the filing is still in the confidential phase, the company will be going back and forth with the SEC, which will review it and suggest or require changes.

tech
Rani Molla

OpenAI’s models are officially coming to Amazon

Amazon is finally getting in on the hottest ticket in tech.

After Microsoft announced yesterday that it has agreed to give up its exclusive rights to sell OpenAI’s models, Amazon, as expected, will start offering them to customers — something Amazon Web Services CEO Matt Garman says users have been asking for “for a really long time.” Some models are available now in preview, and the most powerful GPT versions will show up “in the coming weeks.”

This is a big shift in the AI cloud wars. Microsoft’s early bet on OpenAI gave Azure an edge by locking up the most in-demand models. Now that exclusivity is gone, Amazon and other competitors can finally offer them too, closing a key gap and competing more directly for AI customers.

This is a big shift in the AI cloud wars. Microsoft’s early bet on OpenAI gave Azure an edge by locking up the most in-demand models. Now that exclusivity is gone, Amazon and other competitors can finally offer them too, closing a key gap and competing more directly for AI customers.

tech

Ship-tracking app surges as Iran war continues

As Middle East peace talks stretch on, with Tehran reportedly offering to reopen the Strait of Hormuz if the US lifts its blockade and the war ends, the owner of shipping intelligence platform MarineTraffic revealed that the app has gained millions of new users since the conflict began.

MarineTraffic’s user count jumped to 8.5 million this April, up from 3.5 million a year ago, the cofounder of its parent company, Kpler, said in an interview with the Financial Times. Paid subscribers, often workers within companies and governments looking for more data on supply chains and commodities trading, rose 11,000 in the same period.

Kpler, which also owns shipping intelligence platform FleetMon, draws its data from a range of sources, including the Automatic Identification System, satellites, and more than 500 people on-site, like port terminal operators.

Per Appfigures data, MarineTraffic is estimated to have raked in almost $1 million across March and April in app revenue (through April 27), more than double the ~$346,500 from the same months last year. Across the full year, Kpler expects to earn between $300 million and $400 million in annual recurring revenues.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.