Tech
Allen & Co Brings Together Media And Tech Titans In Sun Valley
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy at the Sun Valley Conference on July 9, 2025, in Sun Valley, Idaho (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Analysts think Amazon’s sky-high capex is a good thing, even if there’s “shock value” for investors

That said, several analysts also lowered their price targets for Amazon the day after its downbeat earnings report.

Amazon is down 8% today after reporting earnings below expectations, light profit guidance, and an eye-watering $200 billion capital expenditure forecast for this year. But as was the case with Alphabet earlier in the week, analysts seem to think Amazon’s growing spending is a positive.

The question is coming up more and more often as tech giants continue pouring buckets of money into their capex: how should outsiders perceive that spending?

Here are what some of the analysts think, from research notes out today:

JPMorgan’s Doug Anmuth says the $200 billion capex plan has some “shock value to it” but looks more alarming than it really is. While the headline number is larger than Google’s or Meta’s, the firm notes that Amazon’s capex growth is actually smaller — about 30% off the Q4 run rate — and roughly $45 billion is tied to retail.

“Make no mistake, the ~$70B step-up this year is driven largely by AWS and AI, and that’s actually a good thing,” the analyst wrote, adding that Amazon is “willing to take some near-term profit pain to drive significant long-term growth opportunities.”

JPM lowered its price target on the stock to $265 from $305.

Brian Nowak at Morgan Stanley says Amazon is leaning into investment because its core businesses are gaining momentum, with AWS growing faster than expected and retail delivering improving efficiency. While Amazon’s higher-than-expected capex may have rattled investors, the firm says it “should not have been unexpected” this earnings season and argues that “strong AWS growth justifies the spend.”

The bigger investor sticking point, Nowak says, is Amazon’s accelerated multibillion-dollar investment in low-Earth orbit satellites, which lacks clear near-term return metrics. Still, Morgan Stanley remains bullish, calling Amazon the “most under-appreciated GenAI winner” among megacap tech.

Morgan Stanley lowered its target price on the stock to $300 from $315.

Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives says Amazon’s results put the company into “prove-it mode” with investors, even as fundamentals remain solid. Amazon’s $200 billion capex plan — about $50 billion higher than expected — will “remain an overhang as investors digest the guide and will likely need to see more tangible returns before regaining comfort.” Ives argues the spending is consistent with Amazon’s long-term strategy, citing accelerating AWS growth, improving retail margins, and strength in advertising as key supports, and says Amazon’s lead in AI is “underappreciated.” Still he lowered his firm’s price target to $300 from $340 to account for near-term profit pressure.

Morningstar analyst Dan Romanoff says Amazon’s fourth-quarter results were solid, but operating income and guidance came in lighter than expected. He points to higher capex plans as a constraint on near-term margin expansion, even as demand — particularly in AWS — remains strong.

“Paired with capital expenditure guidance, these flow through our model, holding valuation steady,” Romanoff wrote, adding that “given the recent selloff, we view shares as attractive.” Morningstar maintained its price target on the stock.

Deutsche Bank analysts wrote that fears of hyperscalers becoming more capital intensive and that investors won’t get a good enough return on that investment “will prove to be unfounded” when it comes to Amazon.

Instead they see the increasing capex as a “pull forward of capital that would have been deployed in the cloud over many years” and have already clocked “very healthy ROIC” for AWS.

“Amazon has spent the better part of the last 20 years watching AWS demand signals and converting that into capacity plans,” they wrote, adding, “There is no company with more data and experience to make this capacity growth decision in 26 and beyond.”

Deutsche, did, however, modestly lower its price target to $290 from $300.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Tom Jones

Prediction markets have, predictably, been given a boost by the summer of sports

Major platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen huge upticks in users of late, thanks in no small part to what’s felt like a recent sporting smorgasbord, with major competitions across hockey, basketball, and soccer soaking up fans’ time (and spending, clearly) at the outset of summer.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

Rani Molla6/15/26
tech
Jon Keegan

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.