Tech
Uber
(Sebastian Gollnow/Getty Images)

FTC sues Uber over its subscription service

Uber One reached 30 million members at the end of 2024, up roughly 50% year over year, the company reported in its most recent earnings report.

J. Edward Moreno

Uber deceived customers and put up obstacles for them to cancel its Uber One subscription service, the Federal Trade Commission alleged in a lawsuit filed Monday.

The FTC says the ride-hailing giant misled people on how much they would save using Uber One, a membership program that offers discounts and perks for $9.99 a month, and made it difficult to get out of the program. The company’s stock fell more than 4% on the news.

Uber One reached 30 million members at the end of 2024, up roughly 50% year over year, the company reported in its most recent earnings report. Uber One members spend 3x more than nonmembers, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference in March.

According to the FTC, Uber signed people up for the subscription service without their consent and required them to take at least 12 steps before they could cancel, and even more steps if they were canceling within 48 hours of their next billing date. Sometimes users were still charged even after they thought they canceled.

“I tried to cancel the subscription before the end of the free trial but the option of Ending Subscription on their app just goes on a loop, said one customer quoted in the complaint. After you click on it, it redirects you back to the membership page where it still shows that you are still subscribed.”

Uber denies the FTCs allegations. Canceling Uber One takes 20 seconds or less, an Uber spokesperson said in a statement. It is true that in the past, customers canceling within 48 hours of their next billing period had to contact customer support to cancel, but that is no longer the case and those who needed refunds got them, the company said.

Ubers legal team consists of two former FTC commissioners: Tim Muris, former FTC Chair under President George W. Bush who is now a partner at Sidley Austin, and Christine Wilson, a former commissioner appointed by President Trump who is now a partner at Freshfields.

The FTCs lawsuit is the latest indication that the tech sector might not be getting preferential treatment from the Trump administration, despite its shift to the right. Antitrust and consumer protection, the center of the FTCs mandate, has been one force pushing tech companies away from Democrats.

Khosrowshahi, for one, celebrated the Trump administrations diversity of voices in January at the World Economic Forum annual conference in Switzerland. He was also one of many CEOs who gave to Trump’s inaugural fund, donating $1 million.

Still, his firm found itself in the crosshairs of the FTC. The agency has also not let go its antitrust lawsuits seeking to break up Google and Meta.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Musk: Tesla restarting Dojo supercomputer effort as “AI5 chip design is in good shape”

Tesla CEO Elon Musk said in a post on X over the weekend that the company plans to restart work on its Dojo supercomputer, dubbed Dojo3, saying that the AI5 chip the company had been developing is in “good shape.”

The Dojo supercomputer trains Tesla’s AI models, including the one behind its all-important Full Self-Driving tech. The company stopped work on Dojo in August. “It doesn’t make sense for Tesla to divide its resources and scale two quite different AI chip designs,” Musk said at the time. “The Tesla AI5, AI6 and subsequent chips will be excellent for inference and at least pretty good for training.”

“Pretty good” appears to be good enough.

In the interim, Tesla relied more on companies like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices for AI training. Restarting Dojo suggests Tesla plans to bring at least some AI training back in house.

Musk also runs the AI company xAI, which has its own supercomputer and a substantial business relationship with Tesla. A plurality of Tesla shareholders recently voted in favor of investing in Musk’s AI company, but the board declined to approve the measure because of a large number of abstentions.

tech
Jon Keegan

EPA: xAI’s Colossus data center illegally used gas turbines without permits

The Environmental Protection Agency has ruled that xAI violated the law when it used dozens of portable gas generators for its Colossus 1 data center without air quality permits.

When xAI set out to build Colossus 1 in Memphis, Tennessee, CEO Elon Musk wanted to move with unprecedented speed, avoiding all of the red tape that could slow such a big project down.

To power the 1-gigawatt data center, Musk took advantage of a local loophole that allowed portable gas generators to be used without any permits, as long as they did not spend more than 364 days in the same spot. That allowed xAI to bring in dozens of truck-sized gas generators to quickly supply the massive amount of power the data center needed to train xAI’s Grok model.

The new EPA rule says the use of such portable generators falls under federal regulation, and the company did need air quality permits to operate the turbines. xAI is also using dozens of such generators to power its Colossus 2 data center just over the border in Alabama.

To power the 1-gigawatt data center, Musk took advantage of a local loophole that allowed portable gas generators to be used without any permits, as long as they did not spend more than 364 days in the same spot. That allowed xAI to bring in dozens of truck-sized gas generators to quickly supply the massive amount of power the data center needed to train xAI’s Grok model.

The new EPA rule says the use of such portable generators falls under federal regulation, and the company did need air quality permits to operate the turbines. xAI is also using dozens of such generators to power its Colossus 2 data center just over the border in Alabama.

tech
Rani Molla

Trump to push Big Tech to fund new power plants as AI drives up electricity costs

President Donald Trump is expected to announce a plan Friday morning that would require Big Tech companies to bid on 15-year contracts for new electricity generation capacity. The move would effectively force companies to help fund new power plants in the PJM region as soaring demand from AI data centers pushes up electricity costs across the US power grid.

Earlier this week, Trump called on tech giants to “pay their own way,” arguing that households and small businesses should not bear the cost of power infrastructure needed to support energy-hungry data centers.

Microsoft quickly responded, saying it would “pay utility rates that are high enough to cover our electricity costs,” along with committing to other changes aimed at easing pressure on the grid. Other major tech companies are expected to follow suit, though Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives warned the added costs could slow the pace of data center build-outs.

As we’ve noted, forcing tech companies to shoulder higher electricity costs is likely to hit some firms harder than others. Companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon can pass at least some of those costs on to customers by selling data center capacity downstream. Meta, in contrast, does not have a cloud business, meaning its AI ambitions lack a direct revenue stream to offset rising power costs.

So far tech stocks don’t appear to be affected much in premarket trading. However utility companies most levered to the AI boom certainly are, with Vistra, Constellation Energy, and Talen Energy deep in the red ahead of the open as analysts at Jefferies warn that these firms face risks from this plan.

Earlier this week, Trump called on tech giants to “pay their own way,” arguing that households and small businesses should not bear the cost of power infrastructure needed to support energy-hungry data centers.

Microsoft quickly responded, saying it would “pay utility rates that are high enough to cover our electricity costs,” along with committing to other changes aimed at easing pressure on the grid. Other major tech companies are expected to follow suit, though Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives warned the added costs could slow the pace of data center build-outs.

As we’ve noted, forcing tech companies to shoulder higher electricity costs is likely to hit some firms harder than others. Companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon can pass at least some of those costs on to customers by selling data center capacity downstream. Meta, in contrast, does not have a cloud business, meaning its AI ambitions lack a direct revenue stream to offset rising power costs.

So far tech stocks don’t appear to be affected much in premarket trading. However utility companies most levered to the AI boom certainly are, with Vistra, Constellation Energy, and Talen Energy deep in the red ahead of the open as analysts at Jefferies warn that these firms face risks from this plan.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.