Tech
tech
Jon Keegan

Musk’s xAI sues former employee, alleging theft of trade secrets

Elon Musk’s xAI has filed suit in Northern California federal court against a former engineer, alleging that he stole trade secrets from the company just before leaving for a job at OpenAI.

Xuechen Li started working for xAI in February 2024 after receiving his Ph.D. in computer science from Stanford University.

In late July, Li sold $7 million worth of his xAI shares to the company as part of a liquidity grant for employees.

The complaint alleges that once the sale was complete, Li illegally copied xAI files:

“On July 25, 2025 — the same day he concluded his second sale of equity and had millions in cash on hand — Defendant betrayed the trust and faith xAI had placed in him by willfully and maliciously copying xAI Confidential Information (as defined in the Agreement) and trade secrets from his xAI-issued laptop to one or more non-xAI physical or online storage systems within his personal control (collectively, ‘Personal System’).”

Three days later, Li resigned to take a job at OpenAI.

Reuters wrote that Li didn’t immediately respond to its request for comment.

The complaint also alleges:

“Defendant, with his attorney present, admitted in a handwritten document he provided to xAI that he misappropriated xAI’s Confidential Information and trade secrets, and again, with his attorney present, admitted verbally during in-person meetings with xAI that he engaged in such misappropriation and further admitted that he tried to hide his theft.”

The complaint also alleges Li withheld accounts and credentials from forensic investigators after handing over personal devices to the company.

The complaint alleges that once the sale was complete, Li illegally copied xAI files:

“On July 25, 2025 — the same day he concluded his second sale of equity and had millions in cash on hand — Defendant betrayed the trust and faith xAI had placed in him by willfully and maliciously copying xAI Confidential Information (as defined in the Agreement) and trade secrets from his xAI-issued laptop to one or more non-xAI physical or online storage systems within his personal control (collectively, ‘Personal System’).”

Three days later, Li resigned to take a job at OpenAI.

Reuters wrote that Li didn’t immediately respond to its request for comment.

The complaint also alleges:

“Defendant, with his attorney present, admitted in a handwritten document he provided to xAI that he misappropriated xAI’s Confidential Information and trade secrets, and again, with his attorney present, admitted verbally during in-person meetings with xAI that he engaged in such misappropriation and further admitted that he tried to hide his theft.”

The complaint also alleges Li withheld accounts and credentials from forensic investigators after handing over personal devices to the company.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

After tussle with Pentagon, Anthropic’s $60 billion worth of recent investments might be at risk

The fallout from Anthropic’s dramatic split from the Pentagon is still being measured. For a domestic company to be labeled a “supply-chain risk to national security” by the US defense secretary is unprecedented, as Anthropic noted in a post responding to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s tweet.

Making it even more shocking is the fact that Anthropic appeared to be on track to have one of the largest and most anticipated tech IPOs in American history.

Axios’ Dan Primack writes that the $60 billion in venture capital Anthropic just raised last month could very well be at risk. Primack argues that investors may get cold feet now that the company has run afoul of the Trump administration, and it faces significant uncertainty as the industry waits to see what official acts follow Hegseth’s words.

Making it even more shocking is the fact that Anthropic appeared to be on track to have one of the largest and most anticipated tech IPOs in American history.

Axios’ Dan Primack writes that the $60 billion in venture capital Anthropic just raised last month could very well be at risk. Primack argues that investors may get cold feet now that the company has run afoul of the Trump administration, and it faces significant uncertainty as the industry waits to see what official acts follow Hegseth’s words.

tech

Google may not just power Apple’s Siri — it could host it, too

Apple has asked Google to look into running the upcoming AI Siri on its servers, The Information reports, following a previous agreement for Google’s Gemini model to underpin the new Siri in the first place.

Apple’s reliance on third parties for AI and cloud computing has helped it keep spending lower than its peers. But it also deepens the company’s dependence on rivals for critical AI infrastructure. Apple already relies heavily on Google and Amazon for cloud services. Hosting Siri on Google’s servers would expand that relationship.

Apple has invested in its own AI cloud system, Private Cloud Compute, meant to run sensitive queries on Apple-designed servers. But according to The Information, only about 10% of that capacity is in use, potentially signaling another AI execution problem for Apple.

Apple has invested in its own AI cloud system, Private Cloud Compute, meant to run sensitive queries on Apple-designed servers. But according to The Information, only about 10% of that capacity is in use, potentially signaling another AI execution problem for Apple.

tech

Good news: Tesla sales stabilized in Europe. Bad news: Europe’s not buying much.

The good news for Tesla: vehicle sales jumped in February in a number of early-reporting European countries.

The bad news: Europe remains a small market for Tesla, so stabilization there isn’t the boon it would be in bigger markets like the US and China, where its vehicle sales continue to struggle.

For what it’s worth, Tesla has been de-emphasizing vehicle sales as it pivots its ambitions to AI and autonomy.

For what it’s worth, Tesla has been de-emphasizing vehicle sales as it pivots its ambitions to AI and autonomy.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.