Tech
Femme fatale
Go get your DNA data! (Getty Images)

Traffic to 23andMe’s website spiked 692% as customers rushed to delete their DNA data

Did you go straight to 23andMe’s website to wipe your info? New data shows so did 1.5 million other people.

Giving your genetic data to a random company on the internet does sound potentially risky, and yet, millions of us did exactly that in the 19 years that genetic testing firm 23andMe was live.

Eager to uncover potential hints about their health, understand their ancestry, find their relatives, or purely because they were bored, more than 15 million people became customers of the once trailblazing biotechnology company. But after the company announced this week that it was officially filing for bankruptcy and looking for a buyer after years of financial struggle, the same thought struck journalists, customers, and regulators all at once: what, exactly, is the company going to do with all of that DNA data?

Many people didn’t fancy waiting around to find out.

Indeed, data provided to Sherwood News from Similarweb, a digital market intelligence company, reveals the scale of the panic that set in, with some 1.5 million page visits tracked to 23andMe.com. Compared to the average day for the rest of 2025, thats up 692%.

Ironically, the company — which was once worth as much as $6 billion — has never been so buzzy. The surge of activity earlier this week even caused the site to crash, with users reporting difficulties as they sought to wipe their genetic information, family trees, and health histories, per the BBC.

In the company’s statement, Mark Jensen, chair and member of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors, was clear to try and assuage customer concerns about the safety of their DNA data:

“After a thorough evaluation of strategic alternatives, we have determined that a court-supervised sale process is the best path forward to maximize the value of the business.”

And (emphasis ours):

“We want to thank our employees for their dedication to 23andMe’s mission. We are committed to supporting them as we move through the process. In addition, we are committed to continuing to safeguard customer data and being transparent about the management of user data going forward, and data privacy will be an important consideration in any potential transaction.”

People, uh, aren’t entirely taking his word for it, with Google Trends data also revealing that searches for 23andMe have overwhelmingly been related to deleting user accounts.

So, how do you delete your 23andMe data? According to CBS News, it’s as easy as:

  1. Log in to your account

  2. Go to “Settings

  3. Scroll to 23andMe data

  4. Click “View

  5. Scroll to “Delete data

  6. Click “Permanently delete data

  7. Confirm your request

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Anthropic has surged past OpenAI in capturing business spending on generative AI software

Last quarter, Anthropic attracted the lion’s share of trackable business spending on generative AI software, according to new data from Ramp, a fintech company that provides corporate cards and expense-management software for small firms and Fortune 500 companies alike.

The data showed that in Q1 Anthropic saw 37% of spending, its biggest share yet, versus 33% for OpenAI. Notably, the dataset doesn’t capture spending on Google or Microsoft.

OpenAI, which makes ChatGPT, still leads in overall adoption at 81% of AI buyers, but Anthropic is catching up, at nearly 63% in March. Overall, more than half of Ramp’s customers currently pay for AI, up from just 18% two years ago.

Anthropic’s enterprise tools, including Claude Code and Cowork, have been making waves among the business class, sending its revenue soaring.

Anthropic’s revenue share is even higher among companies spending on AI for the first time.

“Anthropic has definitely been on a tear,” Ara Kharazian, Ramp’s economist, told Sherwood. “Its increase in adoption rates has been driven by its ability to sell to less technical users and smaller contracts than it typically has.”

It's notable that midway through the first quarter, Anthropic had a falling-out with one of its biggest customers, the US government, which near the end of February decided to shun Anthropic's products and lean into working with OpenAI.

tech

Report: Google ditches its objection to defense work, pitches Gemini to Pentagon

In 2018, Google employees protested against the company’s tech being used for the US military’s Project Maven — a drone targeting program — reminding the company of its “don’t be evil” motto.

After the controversy, the company declined to renew the contract with the Pentagon, drawing a bright line between Big Tech and the national security establishment.

What a difference a few years makes.

Google is now actively working to get its Gemini AI model to be used in classified national security settings, according to a new report from The Information. Seeking a similar deal to the one OpenAI hashed out with the Pentagon, Google reportedly wants a contract that allows use of Gemini in classified work, but with a prohibition on mass domestic surveillance and autonomous lethal weapons.

But Google is playing catch-up in a major way. Amazon and Microsoft both have been widely used for classified defense work, and contractors are already experienced in working with their cloud systems, while Google’s services have never been used in classified work.

What a difference a few years makes.

Google is now actively working to get its Gemini AI model to be used in classified national security settings, according to a new report from The Information. Seeking a similar deal to the one OpenAI hashed out with the Pentagon, Google reportedly wants a contract that allows use of Gemini in classified work, but with a prohibition on mass domestic surveillance and autonomous lethal weapons.

But Google is playing catch-up in a major way. Amazon and Microsoft both have been widely used for classified defense work, and contractors are already experienced in working with their cloud systems, while Google’s services have never been used in classified work.

1 in 5

We knew Tesla had been off-loading its struggling “apocalypse-proof” Cybertrucks onto CEO Elon Musk’s other companies, but now we know just how many.

The EV company sold about one in five Cybertrucks registered in the US in the fourth quarter to Musk’s other ventures, according to Bloomberg, citing data from S&P Global Mobility. The lion’s share went to SpaceX, which accounted for 1,279 of the 7,071 total registrations, while another 60 went to xAI (now part of SpaceX), Neuralink, and The Boring Company. All told, these inter-company sales represent roughly $100 million in value, and a vital lifeline for a vehicle that has failed to gain traction with the public, forcing Tesla to scale back production.

Musk’s companies have continued to scoop up the stainless steel behemoths this year, with another 158 Cybertruck purchases in January and 67 in February.

tech

TSMC CEO on Tesla and Intel’s Terafab: “There are no shortcuts”

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has reportedly asked the chip industry suppliers for his Terafab chipmaking project to move at “light speed” in an effort to help Tesla and SpaceX manufacture the AI chips they need.

On the company’s last earnings call, Musk said chip supply would be the “limiting factor” for Tesla’s growth in about three or four years. During a presentation for the Terafab last month, Musk said, “We either build the Terafab or we don’t have the chips.” More established chipmaker Intel has since joined the effort.

Still, the worlds largest chipmaker isnt convinced that “light speed” is physically possible. Speaking on an earnings call this morning, TSMC Chairman and CEO CC Wei offered a blunt assessment of Terafabs ambitious timeline: “There are no shortcuts.” According to Wei, the physics of a modern foundry, which he says takes roughly five years to build and ramp, remains the ultimate speed limit, regardless of the customers urgency. “Thats a fundamental of the foundry industry,” he said.

Wei noted that Tesla remains a TSMC customer.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.