Tech
tech

WSJ report: With CEO Musk’s attention diverted, Tesla’s board opened a search for his potential successor

With Elon Musk playing a big role in the government and Tesla’s stock dropping, the company’s board started thinking about who might be Tesla’s next CEO, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal late Wednesday night.

The report, citing anonymous sources, said Tesla board members reached out to “several executive search firms to work on a formal process for finding Tesla’s next chief executive” about a month ago.

Any change at the top of Tesla would be monumental, given that Musk is often cited as the reason the stock trades at a serious premium to its fundamentals. And frankly, the move reads like this might have been a scare tactic. The Journal’s report says: 

Around that time, Tesla’s board met with Musk for an update. Board members told him he needed to spend more time on Tesla, according to people familiar with the meeting. And he needed to say so publicly.

Musk didn’t push back.

More from the Journal, which has gotten other notable scoops on the Tesla board, here:

The board narrowed its focus to a major search firm, according to the people familiar with the discussions. The current status of the succession planning couldn’t be determined. It is also unclear if Musk, himself a Tesla board member, was aware of the effort, or if his pledge to spend more time at Tesla has affected succession planning. Musk didn’t respond to requests for comment.  

It seems pretty clear that if Musk were to be out at Tesla, the stock would drop. After all, investors and the board itself have been clamoring for more Musk, not less. 

It’s unclear whether it’s related, but just before the report published, Musk somewhat cryptically posted on X:

Hours after the report came out, Tesla posted on X:

Weird for a company that has a notorious record of not even replying to requests for comment to say “this was communicated to the media” beforehand! (As a reminder, another Musk-run company once staffed its press line with an auto-reply of a poop emoji.)

Typically, company statements like these are worded in very specific and nuanced ways. (Note that it took Tesla nearly 4.5 hours to publish a 68-word statement after the report came out.) That alone is worth attention, on top of the fact that the WSJ hasn’t changed its story since the statement was released.

Any change at the top of Tesla would be monumental, given that Musk is often cited as the reason the stock trades at a serious premium to its fundamentals. And frankly, the move reads like this might have been a scare tactic. The Journal’s report says: 

Around that time, Tesla’s board met with Musk for an update. Board members told him he needed to spend more time on Tesla, according to people familiar with the meeting. And he needed to say so publicly.

Musk didn’t push back.

More from the Journal, which has gotten other notable scoops on the Tesla board, here:

The board narrowed its focus to a major search firm, according to the people familiar with the discussions. The current status of the succession planning couldn’t be determined. It is also unclear if Musk, himself a Tesla board member, was aware of the effort, or if his pledge to spend more time at Tesla has affected succession planning. Musk didn’t respond to requests for comment.  

It seems pretty clear that if Musk were to be out at Tesla, the stock would drop. After all, investors and the board itself have been clamoring for more Musk, not less. 

It’s unclear whether it’s related, but just before the report published, Musk somewhat cryptically posted on X:

Hours after the report came out, Tesla posted on X:

Weird for a company that has a notorious record of not even replying to requests for comment to say “this was communicated to the media” beforehand! (As a reminder, another Musk-run company once staffed its press line with an auto-reply of a poop emoji.)

Typically, company statements like these are worded in very specific and nuanced ways. (Note that it took Tesla nearly 4.5 hours to publish a 68-word statement after the report came out.) That alone is worth attention, on top of the fact that the WSJ hasn’t changed its story since the statement was released.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Epic scores two victories as “Fortnite” returns to Google Play and appeals court keeps injunction against Apple

“Fortnite” maker Epic Games notched two wins Thursday in its drawn-out battle against Big Tech’s app stores. “Fortnite” returned to the Google Play app store in the US, Reuters reports, as Epic continues working with Google to secure court approval for their settlement.

Meanwhile, a US appeals court partly reversed sanctions against Apple in Epic’s antitrust case, calling parts of the order overly broad, but upheld the contempt finding and left a sweeping injunction in place — keeping pressure on Apple to allow developers to steer users to outside payment options and reduce its tight control over how apps can communicate and monetize on iOS.

tech

Report: AI-powered toys tell kids where to find matches, parrot Chinese government propaganda

You may want to think twice before buying your kids a fancy AI-powered plush toy.

A new report from NBC News found that several AI-powered kids toys could easily be steered to dangerous as well as sexually explicit conversations in a shocking demonstration of the loose safety guardrails in this novel category of consumer electronics.

A report out by the Public Interest Research Group details what researchers found when they tested five AI-powered toys for kids bought from Amazon. Some of the toys offered instructions on where to find matches and how to start fires.

NBC News also bought some of these toys and found they parroted Chinese government propaganda and gave instructions for how to sharpen knives. Some of the toys also discussed inappropriate topics for kids, like sexual kinks.

The category of AI-powered kids toys is under scrutiny as major AI companies like OpenAI have announced partnerships with toy manufacturers like Mattel (which has yet to release an AI-powered toy).

A report out by the Public Interest Research Group details what researchers found when they tested five AI-powered toys for kids bought from Amazon. Some of the toys offered instructions on where to find matches and how to start fires.

NBC News also bought some of these toys and found they parroted Chinese government propaganda and gave instructions for how to sharpen knives. Some of the toys also discussed inappropriate topics for kids, like sexual kinks.

The category of AI-powered kids toys is under scrutiny as major AI companies like OpenAI have announced partnerships with toy manufacturers like Mattel (which has yet to release an AI-powered toy).

tech

OpenAI releases GPT-5.2, the “best model yet for real-world, professional use”

After feeling the heat from Google’s recent launch of its powerful Gemini 3 model, OpenAI’s response to its “code red” has been released, reportedly on an accelerated schedule to keep up with the competition.

The company’s new flagship model, GPT-5.2, is out, and the company is calling it “the most capable model series yet for professional knowledge work.”

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called it the “smartest generally-available model in the world” and shared benchmarks that showed it achieving higher scores than Gemini 3 Pro and Anthopic’s Claude Opus 4.5 in some software engineering tests and abstract reasoning, math, and science problems.

In a press release announcing the new model, the company said: “Overall, GPT‑5.2 brings significant improvements in general intelligence, long-context understanding, agentic tool-calling, and vision — making it better at executing complex, real-world tasks end-to-end than any previous model.”

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called it the “smartest generally-available model in the world” and shared benchmarks that showed it achieving higher scores than Gemini 3 Pro and Anthopic’s Claude Opus 4.5 in some software engineering tests and abstract reasoning, math, and science problems.

In a press release announcing the new model, the company said: “Overall, GPT‑5.2 brings significant improvements in general intelligence, long-context understanding, agentic tool-calling, and vision — making it better at executing complex, real-world tasks end-to-end than any previous model.”

tech

Google sinks on a string of bad news

Google is currently down nearly 2% amid a flurry of bad news for the tech giant:

  • OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said Google’s much-touted Gemini 3 model “had less of an impact on our metrics than maybe we feared.”

  • Disney sent Google a cease and desist letter accusing it of infringing Disney’s copyrights after announcing a $1 billion investment in competitor OpenAI.

  • Waymo recalled basically all of its vehicles — 3,067 — for a software update to fix a high-profile problem they had with driving past stopped school buses.

  • The AI trade generally is struggling today after Oracle posted underwhelming earnings results yesterday.

tech

Altman: Gemini 3 had less of an impact than we had feared

There have been a lot “code reds” flying around the AI world recently. But it turns out that the latest, declared by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, may not be as dire as expected.

This morning Altman appeared on CNBC with Disney CEO Bob Iger to discuss Disney’s $1 billion investment in OpenAI. Altman told CNBC that Google’s Gemini 3 has “had less of an impact on our metrics than maybe we feared.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.