Tech
tech

WSJ report: With CEO Musk’s attention diverted, Tesla’s board opened a search for his potential successor

With Elon Musk playing a big role in the government and Tesla’s stock dropping, the company’s board started thinking about who might be Tesla’s next CEO, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal late Wednesday night.

The report, citing anonymous sources, said Tesla board members reached out to “several executive search firms to work on a formal process for finding Tesla’s next chief executive” about a month ago.

Any change at the top of Tesla would be monumental, given that Musk is often cited as the reason the stock trades at a serious premium to its fundamentals. And frankly, the move reads like this might have been a scare tactic. The Journal’s report says: 

Around that time, Tesla’s board met with Musk for an update. Board members told him he needed to spend more time on Tesla, according to people familiar with the meeting. And he needed to say so publicly.

Musk didn’t push back.

More from the Journal, which has gotten other notable scoops on the Tesla board, here:

The board narrowed its focus to a major search firm, according to the people familiar with the discussions. The current status of the succession planning couldn’t be determined. It is also unclear if Musk, himself a Tesla board member, was aware of the effort, or if his pledge to spend more time at Tesla has affected succession planning. Musk didn’t respond to requests for comment.  

It seems pretty clear that if Musk were to be out at Tesla, the stock would drop. After all, investors and the board itself have been clamoring for more Musk, not less. 

It’s unclear whether it’s related, but just before the report published, Musk somewhat cryptically posted on X:

Hours after the report came out, Tesla posted on X:

Weird for a company that has a notorious record of not even replying to requests for comment to say “this was communicated to the media” beforehand! (As a reminder, another Musk-run company once staffed its press line with an auto-reply of a poop emoji.)

Typically, company statements like these are worded in very specific and nuanced ways. (Note that it took Tesla nearly 4.5 hours to publish a 68-word statement after the report came out.) That alone is worth attention, on top of the fact that the WSJ hasn’t changed its story since the statement was released.

Any change at the top of Tesla would be monumental, given that Musk is often cited as the reason the stock trades at a serious premium to its fundamentals. And frankly, the move reads like this might have been a scare tactic. The Journal’s report says: 

Around that time, Tesla’s board met with Musk for an update. Board members told him he needed to spend more time on Tesla, according to people familiar with the meeting. And he needed to say so publicly.

Musk didn’t push back.

More from the Journal, which has gotten other notable scoops on the Tesla board, here:

The board narrowed its focus to a major search firm, according to the people familiar with the discussions. The current status of the succession planning couldn’t be determined. It is also unclear if Musk, himself a Tesla board member, was aware of the effort, or if his pledge to spend more time at Tesla has affected succession planning. Musk didn’t respond to requests for comment.  

It seems pretty clear that if Musk were to be out at Tesla, the stock would drop. After all, investors and the board itself have been clamoring for more Musk, not less. 

It’s unclear whether it’s related, but just before the report published, Musk somewhat cryptically posted on X:

Hours after the report came out, Tesla posted on X:

Weird for a company that has a notorious record of not even replying to requests for comment to say “this was communicated to the media” beforehand! (As a reminder, another Musk-run company once staffed its press line with an auto-reply of a poop emoji.)

Typically, company statements like these are worded in very specific and nuanced ways. (Note that it took Tesla nearly 4.5 hours to publish a 68-word statement after the report came out.) That alone is worth attention, on top of the fact that the WSJ hasn’t changed its story since the statement was released.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Meta: Facebook is for the children, basically

Meta has a youth problem that it keeps trying to fix using old stuff. This time it’s trying to bring back “pokes” — a feature from yesteryear the social media company had buried that allows users to digitally nudge others without having to say anything.

To make the feature shiny and new, the company is adding “counts,” along with a dedicated poke button and page, so users can keep track of who they poked or were poked by and how much.

Meta is hoping the updated feature will lead to more usage from young people, who’ve already started to adopt the practice thanks to previous pushes by Meta. Social media companies, like Snapchat and TikTok, have previously gotten into hot water before for similar gamification elements like “streaks” that critics have said are addictive.

The average age of Facebook users has been ticking up for years as the company loses young people to newer services, including Instagram, which Meta bought more than a decade ago, back when it was still called Facebook. According to the latest data from Pew Research Center, released last winter, teens were way less inclined to use Facebook than TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat.

Meta is hoping the updated feature will lead to more usage from young people, who’ve already started to adopt the practice thanks to previous pushes by Meta. Social media companies, like Snapchat and TikTok, have previously gotten into hot water before for similar gamification elements like “streaks” that critics have said are addictive.

The average age of Facebook users has been ticking up for years as the company loses young people to newer services, including Instagram, which Meta bought more than a decade ago, back when it was still called Facebook. According to the latest data from Pew Research Center, released last winter, teens were way less inclined to use Facebook than TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat.

tech

OpenAI is working on a “jobs platform” for people who lose their jobs to AI

OpenAI has some good news and bad news for workers. The bad news? AI will probably take your job. The good news? The company will offer AI-powered classes to retrain you, and try to help you get a job as a certified AI pro.

The company announced plans for the OpenAI Jobs Platform, in partnership with Walmart, John Deere, and Accenture, to help workers looking to level up their AI skills, and match them with companies seeking such candidates.

In a blog post announcing the plan, the company wrote:

“But AI will also be disruptive. Jobs will look different, companies will have to adapt, and all of us—from shift workers to CEOs—will have to learn how to work in new ways. At OpenAI, we can’t eliminate that disruption. But what we can do is help more people become fluent in AI and connect them with companies that need their skills, to give people more economic opportunities. “

Using AI-powered instruction, users can receive certification for their training, and OpenAI said it is committing to certifying 10 million Americans on its platform by 2030.

The company announced plans for the OpenAI Jobs Platform, in partnership with Walmart, John Deere, and Accenture, to help workers looking to level up their AI skills, and match them with companies seeking such candidates.

In a blog post announcing the plan, the company wrote:

“But AI will also be disruptive. Jobs will look different, companies will have to adapt, and all of us—from shift workers to CEOs—will have to learn how to work in new ways. At OpenAI, we can’t eliminate that disruption. But what we can do is help more people become fluent in AI and connect them with companies that need their skills, to give people more economic opportunities. “

Using AI-powered instruction, users can receive certification for their training, and OpenAI said it is committing to certifying 10 million Americans on its platform by 2030.

tech

Trump administration plans to loosen rules for self-driving cars, exempt them from windshield wipers

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said Thursday it’s planning to propose three new rules that will make it easier for self-driving car companies to develop their vehicles more cheaply. Those include getting rid of requirements that were mandatory for human drivers, including gear shift sticks, windshield defrosting and defogging systems, and some lighting equipment.

“Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards were written for vehicles with human drivers and need to be updated for autonomous vehicles. Removing these requirements will reduce costs and enhance safety,” NHTSA Chief Counsel Peter Simshauser said in a statement.

Earlier this year NHTSA announced it was loosening other rules around autonomous cars, including exempting them from certain federal safety rules for research and demonstration purposes. This time around, however, stocks like Tesla, which is banking on autonomous driving as part of the future of the company, aren’t moving as much on the news.

“Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards were written for vehicles with human drivers and need to be updated for autonomous vehicles. Removing these requirements will reduce costs and enhance safety,” NHTSA Chief Counsel Peter Simshauser said in a statement.

Earlier this year NHTSA announced it was loosening other rules around autonomous cars, including exempting them from certain federal safety rules for research and demonstration purposes. This time around, however, stocks like Tesla, which is banking on autonomous driving as part of the future of the company, aren’t moving as much on the news.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.