Tech
tech

WSJ report: With CEO Musk’s attention diverted, Tesla’s board opened a search for his potential successor

With Elon Musk playing a big role in the government and Tesla’s stock dropping, the company’s board started thinking about who might be Tesla’s next CEO, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal late Wednesday night.

The report, citing anonymous sources, said Tesla board members reached out to “several executive search firms to work on a formal process for finding Tesla’s next chief executive” about a month ago.

Any change at the top of Tesla would be monumental, given that Musk is often cited as the reason the stock trades at a serious premium to its fundamentals. And frankly, the move reads like this might have been a scare tactic. The Journal’s report says: 

Around that time, Tesla’s board met with Musk for an update. Board members told him he needed to spend more time on Tesla, according to people familiar with the meeting. And he needed to say so publicly.

Musk didn’t push back.

More from the Journal, which has gotten other notable scoops on the Tesla board, here:

The board narrowed its focus to a major search firm, according to the people familiar with the discussions. The current status of the succession planning couldn’t be determined. It is also unclear if Musk, himself a Tesla board member, was aware of the effort, or if his pledge to spend more time at Tesla has affected succession planning. Musk didn’t respond to requests for comment.  

It seems pretty clear that if Musk were to be out at Tesla, the stock would drop. After all, investors and the board itself have been clamoring for more Musk, not less. 

It’s unclear whether it’s related, but just before the report published, Musk somewhat cryptically posted on X:

Hours after the report came out, Tesla posted on X:

Weird for a company that has a notorious record of not even replying to requests for comment to say “this was communicated to the media” beforehand! (As a reminder, another Musk-run company once staffed its press line with an auto-reply of a poop emoji.)

Typically, company statements like these are worded in very specific and nuanced ways. (Note that it took Tesla nearly 4.5 hours to publish a 68-word statement after the report came out.) That alone is worth attention, on top of the fact that the WSJ hasn’t changed its story since the statement was released.

Any change at the top of Tesla would be monumental, given that Musk is often cited as the reason the stock trades at a serious premium to its fundamentals. And frankly, the move reads like this might have been a scare tactic. The Journal’s report says: 

Around that time, Tesla’s board met with Musk for an update. Board members told him he needed to spend more time on Tesla, according to people familiar with the meeting. And he needed to say so publicly.

Musk didn’t push back.

More from the Journal, which has gotten other notable scoops on the Tesla board, here:

The board narrowed its focus to a major search firm, according to the people familiar with the discussions. The current status of the succession planning couldn’t be determined. It is also unclear if Musk, himself a Tesla board member, was aware of the effort, or if his pledge to spend more time at Tesla has affected succession planning. Musk didn’t respond to requests for comment.  

It seems pretty clear that if Musk were to be out at Tesla, the stock would drop. After all, investors and the board itself have been clamoring for more Musk, not less. 

It’s unclear whether it’s related, but just before the report published, Musk somewhat cryptically posted on X:

Hours after the report came out, Tesla posted on X:

Weird for a company that has a notorious record of not even replying to requests for comment to say “this was communicated to the media” beforehand! (As a reminder, another Musk-run company once staffed its press line with an auto-reply of a poop emoji.)

Typically, company statements like these are worded in very specific and nuanced ways. (Note that it took Tesla nearly 4.5 hours to publish a 68-word statement after the report came out.) That alone is worth attention, on top of the fact that the WSJ hasn’t changed its story since the statement was released.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

SpaceX filings reportedly show no one can fire Elon Musk except Elon Musk

The only thing stopping Elon Musk from being chairman and CEO of SpaceX is Elon Musk, according to Reuters, which viewed an excerpt of the company’s IPO filing.

The document outlines a dual-class share structure giving Musk control via super-voting stock. The filing says he “can only be removed from our board or these positions by the vote of Class B holders” — shares he’ll control after the listing. It adds that if he keeps those shares, he could “continue to control the election and removal of a majority of our board.”

At a typical public company — even founder-led ones with dual-class structures — a CEO can be fired by the board of directors, which represents shareholders and can vote to remove them over issues such as corporate performance, strategy, or misconduct.

The unusual SpaceX setup means Musk is unlikely to face the kind of CEO succession pressure he’s dealt with at Tesla. Musk, of course, is not a typical CEO, and the value of his companies has long been closely tied to his presence.

To be sure, SpaceXs confidential IPO filing isnt in its final form yet — while the filing is still in the confidential phase, the company will be going back and forth with the SEC, which will review it and suggest or require changes.

At a typical public company — even founder-led ones with dual-class structures — a CEO can be fired by the board of directors, which represents shareholders and can vote to remove them over issues such as corporate performance, strategy, or misconduct.

The unusual SpaceX setup means Musk is unlikely to face the kind of CEO succession pressure he’s dealt with at Tesla. Musk, of course, is not a typical CEO, and the value of his companies has long been closely tied to his presence.

To be sure, SpaceXs confidential IPO filing isnt in its final form yet — while the filing is still in the confidential phase, the company will be going back and forth with the SEC, which will review it and suggest or require changes.

tech
Rani Molla

OpenAI’s models are officially coming to Amazon

Amazon is finally getting in on the hottest ticket in tech.

After Microsoft announced yesterday that it has agreed to give up its exclusive rights to sell OpenAI’s models, Amazon, as expected, will start offering them to customers — something Amazon Web Services CEO Matt Garman says users have been asking for “for a really long time.” Some models are available now in preview, and the most powerful GPT versions will show up “in the coming weeks.”

This is a big shift in the AI cloud wars. Microsoft’s early bet on OpenAI gave Azure an edge by locking up the most in-demand models. Now that exclusivity is gone, Amazon and other competitors can finally offer them too, closing a key gap and competing more directly for AI customers.

This is a big shift in the AI cloud wars. Microsoft’s early bet on OpenAI gave Azure an edge by locking up the most in-demand models. Now that exclusivity is gone, Amazon and other competitors can finally offer them too, closing a key gap and competing more directly for AI customers.

tech

Ship-tracking app surges as Iran war continues

As Middle East peace talks stretch on, with Tehran reportedly offering to reopen the Strait of Hormuz if the US lifts its blockade and the war ends, the owner of shipping intelligence platform MarineTraffic revealed that the app has gained millions of new users since the conflict began.

MarineTraffic’s user count jumped to 8.5 million this April, up from 3.5 million a year ago, the cofounder of its parent company, Kpler, said in an interview with the Financial Times. Paid subscribers, often workers within companies and governments looking for more data on supply chains and commodities trading, rose 11,000 in the same period.

Kpler, which also owns shipping intelligence platform FleetMon, draws its data from a range of sources, including the Automatic Identification System, satellites, and more than 500 people on-site, like port terminal operators.

Per Appfigures data, MarineTraffic is estimated to have raked in almost $1 million across March and April in app revenue (through April 27), more than double the ~$346,500 from the same months last year. Across the full year, Kpler expects to earn between $300 million and $400 million in annual recurring revenues.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.