Markets
A Slinky is a precompressed helical spring toy invented by Richard James in the early 1940s
Slinky (Getty Images)

Is Nvidia dead money, or a coiled spring?

The stock has done next to nothing for five months. Stellar Q3 results and guidance failed to inspire a rally.

Luke Kawa

Nvidia, the prime facilitator of the AI boom, reports quarterly results today after the close.

It would be a monumental disappointment if the company reported any negative surprises in the highest-profile numbers. Nvidia has reported better-than-expected adjusted earnings per share for 12 consecutive quarters; on the top line, that streak runs for a baker’s dozen.

“Having said how strong the business is likely to be, we would note that sentiment is positive and expectations are pretty high,” Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore said.

However, if you had nothing but a five-month chart of Nvidia’s share price, you wouldn’t think expectations were too high. You’d think this is a company that’s struggling to convince investors that it’s on the right track.

The beats will continue, but will morale improve?

“We are clearly in an environment of elevated expectations heading into NVDA’s F4Q26 (Jan-Qtr) print, considering the stock has basically moved sideways since the F3Q26 print despite a slew of positive/favorable developments (including announcements of sharply higher hyperscaler capex budgets for calendar year 26 and NVDA’s recently announced partnership with META for large-scale Blackwell/Rubin GPU/CPU/networking deployments),” agreed JPMorgan analyst Harlan Sur.

Sur hits on an important item: the lack of a positive reaction to good news.

That was the story that defined Nvidia’s previous earnings report. On November 19, the company’s results bested expectations, as did its guidance for Q4 revenues and adjusted gross margin. Management tried to give all the right answers on their conference call.

None of it worked. The initial knee-jerk jump in the stock faded, and shares ended the next day sharply lower. It’s not like the stock had been on fire, either: it was down 8% month to date in November ahead of reporting, trailing the S&P 500’s 2.6% slump over the same stretch.

After those results, CEO Jensen Huang claimed that “the whole world would’ve fallen apart” if Nvidia had a bad quarter. The common misconception of Atlas is that he was forced to carry the weight of the world on his shoulders. No doubt, Huang feels like Nvidia is bearing an enormous load. But in fact, the titan was charged with keeping the heavens separated from the earth. Ironically, Huang faces the opposite challenge: designing the chips that will bring digital God to the masses. Presumably, something powerful enough so that investors will stop worrying about his biggest customers’ return on investment.

The failure of positive catalysts to deliver the expected outcome is something that can cause alarm bells to go off for traders, suggesting that the bullish thesis was already well understood and well subscribed.

Three months ago, the predetermined narrative seemed to be that Google, fresh off Gemini 3’s glowing reviews, was becoming a singular AI winner, with a halo effect for many of its supply chain partners, while anything affiliated with OpenAI got crushed.

That makes whether good news can simply be good news this time around the key question to watch for in this earnings report, or if the market’s seemingly narrower focus on AI hardware beneficiaries remains a dominant trend.

The stock has caught a bid ahead of earnings, but came into this week up less than 2% from where it was at the end of Q3. After trading sideways for about five months, is this “dead money” — that is, a stock that’s going nowhere — or, as Macro Risk Advisors CEO Dean Curnutt wrote, a “coiled spring”?

“Over the last three months, Nvidia has traded in a remarkably tight +/- 13.5% range, and that period includes the sharp 10% drawdown and full recovery in early February,” he wrote. “For a name that has historically seen much wider 20% to 40% one-month rolling ranges, this is extraordinary.”

Curnutt flagged a call and put spread trade apiece that expire on March 20 to benefit from potential range expansion (in either direction) following this report. However, he added, “Admittedly, I think Nvidia upside is a more attractive opportunity for most managers.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

markets

Rocket Lab deal lifts space stocks

Shares of Rocket Lab are surging after announcing an $8 billion acquisition of satellite communications operator Iridium Communications, helping lift a broader basket of space-related stocks as investors piled back into the sector.

Planet Labs, AST SpaceMobile and Redwire all traded higher alongside Rocket Lab, extending gains in an industry that has drawn enhanced investor attention in recent months in light of the strategic importance that governments place on space and satellite communications infrastructure.

In a presentation, Rocket Lab’s management called the purchase “a shortcut” for its satellite communications business.

Under the terms of the agreement, Iridium shareholders will receive $27 in cash and Rocket Lab stock, valuing Iridium at $54 per share. Backed by a $3.6 billion bridge loan committed by Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo, Rocket Lab absorbs Iridium’s globally licensed spectrum and an active base of 2.5 million subscribers.

Rocket Lab has also remained one of the most active launch providers in the sector. The company completed its 12th launch of the year last week, maintaining one of the highest launch cadences among commercial space companies.

Today's rally helps offset a brutal stretch for the group. Rocket Lab shares had fallen over 35% over the prior month, while Planet Labs stock was down more than 40% and AST SpaceMobile stock was down around 30% over the same window.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.