Business
TechCrunch Disrupt 2022 - Day 3
Co-founder & CEO of Figma Dylan Field onstage in 2022 (Kimberly White/Getty Images)
DRAWING INTEREST

Figma just filed for IPO, revealing its financials for the first time publicly

Ignoring some one-offs, Figma is a profit machine growing at nearly 50% year on year — no wonder Adobe wanted to drop $20 billion to snap up its disruptive rival.

Silicon Valley likes the enigmatic founder who does things differently, so when Dylan Field wrote “chocolate is repulsive” in his essay for his application for the Thiel Fellowship, he was already fitting into the archetypal tech founder mold.

In the years since, Field and cofounder Evan Wallace went on to start Figma, a design software company that eschewed the collective wisdom that you couldn’t build a powerful, collaborative design tool on the open web. Now, with the stock market climbing a wall of worry to reach new heights, Figma has finally filed for an IPO — revealing its financials publicly for the first time.

So, is this the classic cash-incinerating disruptive startup with a bunch of super-founder shares, tapping the public markets for an enormous payday for early employees and investors? Sort of.

CEO Dylan Field does indeed have a vicelike grip on the company, controlling ~75% of the voting rights pre-IPO, and many employees will no doubt become liquid millionaires once the stock starts trading, but the company’s financials are remarkably mature. In its latest quarter, the company racked up $228 million in revenue (up 46% year on year), with typically tasty software gross margins and an operating profit margin of more than 17%.

The economics of Figma
The Economics of Figma (Sherwood News)

The IPO filing also reveals that it holds nearly $70 million in bitcoin ETFs and $30 million in stablecoins for future bitcoin purchases — a corporate strategy that traders loved initially, but might be starting to sour on.

What’s particularly interesting is just how well Figma has infiltrated the design teams of America’s largest companies. According to the S-1 filing, a whopping “95% of the Fortune 500 and 78% of the Forbes Global 2000 used Figma in March 2025” — and those companies are spending big for the privilege to Draw, Design, and FigJam. Over the past two years, Figma has more than doubled the customers that pay it more than $100,000 annually.

Indeed, with the exception of a one-off stock-based compensation expense in Q2 2024, Figma has slowly but surely trudged toward consistent profitability. Its balance sheet was also bolstered by a $1 billion termination fee from its breakup with Adobe, which had tried to acquire Figma for $20 billion in 2022 — a deal that fell apart because of regulatory hurdles.

Figma 2, profitability
Sherwood News

Now, Figma will be the IPO guinea pig for a swath of still private startups — and none will be watching the Figma offering more closely than Canva, another hot design company that’s rumored to be looking at a public offering of its own, having recently been valued at $49 billion.

More Business

See all Business
Stacked Cars in Parking Lot

With gas prices soaring, the humble sedan is making a comeback

Recent US sales data reveals a “sedanaissance” among major automakers like Honda, Hyundai, and Toyota.

business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.