Business
Old McDonald's restaurant in Downey, Los Angeles, California, USA
Getty Images
Franchise with that?

McDonald’s has a new strategy: Make its stores “easier to run”

Franchised and affiliated locations already make up over 95% of McDonald’s store count and 62% of its sales.

On Monday, McDonald’s unveiled the new global growth strategy it shared with franchisees, with a renewed focus on improving customer service, making better-tasting food and drinks, redesigning restaurants, and letting consumers lead innovation.

Having successfully pivoted to value offerings of late, the new approach, which is dubbed “McDonald’s > NEXT” and aims to make its restaurants “easier to run and more enjoyable to visit,” is built around “improving quality and consistency at scale,” the company’s chief restaurant experience officer wrote in an emailed statement.

It makes sense for the burger chain to put the experience of franchisees as well as customers at the center of the strategy, given its previous push for cheap eats created tensions with some independent store operators — a group that accounts for over 95% of the chain’s global footprint.

McDonald’s franchise store count
Sherwood News

McDonald’s... the real estate company?

When Ray Kroc started franchising McDonald’s branches back in 1955, the revenue-sharing model that dominates the concept of franchising more widely was just lifting off in earnest. With most of Kroc’s turnover initially absorbed by his own McD’s expansion efforts, Kroc essentially pivoted to turning the company into a real estate business, first buying the land and buildings for potential new restaurant locations and then leasing them to franchisees.

That dual-income model continues today, though things have obviously changed a little. Franchisees are expected to initially invest some $1.5 million to $2.8 million (depending on the location of the store), plus royalties and marketing fees that amount to at least 8% of sales for a typical McDonald’s restaurant, as the company divulged in its Franchise Disclosure Document.

As it owns much of the land its restaurants sit on, McDonald’s benefits from another reliable source of revenue many of its peers don’t: rent. Franchisees typically pay 6% to 23% of their gross sales as rent and, if applicable, a monthly fee to reimburse land purchase and development fees to the Golden Arches.

McDonald’s franchise revenue
Sherwood News

We’re all lovin’ it

Of course, franchised spots bring less money per location for their parent company versus company-owned counterparts — McDonald’s raked in only $0.4 million for every franchised store compared to $4.8 million from each of its company-operated ones — but the franchise model’s scale and perks, namely securing a consistent source of sales, have made it a glimmering part of the Golden Arches business.

More Business

See all Business
business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

business
Tom Jones

The $640,000 Luce makes the average Ferrari look like a bargain

Put aside the shape; put aside the smoothing out of Ferrari’s iconic sharp edges; put aside, even, the calls from former Chairman and President Luca Cordero di Montezemolo to “take the Prancing Horse off.” On the grounds of price alone, Luce detractors might have a point.

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.