Musk wants the court to slow OpenAI’s roll

He wants a crackdown on OpenAI allegedly telling its investors to boycott investing in other AI startups.

12/3/24 3:16PM

Another bit of Elon news: on Friday, he filed a preliminary injunction against OpenAI in federal court to stop the $157 billion startup from converting into a fully for-profit business. For context, Musk, who cofounded OpenAI as a nonprofit in 2015 and left the company after a disagreement with its other cofounders over the company’s direction, already sued OpenAI twice in the last year, first in a San Francisco court in March, before dropping that lawsuit and refiling a new suit in federal court in August.

In the previous suits, Musk alleged that he was “courted and deceived” by Sam Altman and OpenAI President Greg Brockman to cofound a nonprofit while Altman always intended to build out a for-profit company under the surface. Musk, whose AI startup xAI is a competitor to OpenAI, has said in his latest injunction that OpenAI led a group boycott of investment capital blocking its current investors from investing in xAI, and that the company should be blocked from “benefitting from wrongfully obtained competitively sensitive information or coordination via the Microsoft-OpenAI board interlocks.”

Basically, Musk doesn’t want OpenAI to convert to a for-profit model, as it goes against the company’s charter, and he wants to prevent OpenAI from allegedly requiring investors to not invest in its competitors. Of course, he has 50 billion reasons to want to slow down OpenAI, given xAI’s recent fundraise, but it is interesting to see the CEO of the world’s most valuable auto company and one of its highest-profile AI companies playing defense in the court with one company, while he’s full-court pressing with the other.

Tom Jones

listening party

5/15/26

Spotify wants us all to join its 20th anniversary celebrations

Looking at its finances, no wonder the streamer’s in a festive mood.

Smartphones are 12% cheaper than last year, according to the latest inflation data... except they’re not

Phones are one of a few important categories that get quality, or “hedonic,” adjustments in the Consumer Price Index — which make their price go down in the official statistics.

David Crowther5/12/26

Max Knoblauch5/11/26

Texas sues Netflix, accusing streamer of spying on children and collecting user data without consent

The state of Texas filed a lawsuit Monday against streaming giant Netflix, alleging that the company has built a “behavioral-surveillance program of staggering scale.”

The suit alleges that Netflix is “deceptively designed” to be addictive, using features like autoplay to get viewers hooked, “mining those users for data, and then converting that data into lucrative intelligence for global advertising juggernauts.”

“When you watch Netflix, Netflix watches you,” the lawsuit reads.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.