Business
Streaming subscriber race
Sherwood News

The economics of Netflix aren’t what they used to be... they’re a lot better

Price rises and a crackdown on password sharing haven’t been popular with users, but shareholders are loving it

Yesterday Netflix rubber-stamped an idea that began as a whisper last year and has slowly become more evident with every passing quarter: the streaming wars are over, and Reed Hastings’ company came out on top.

Going against the grain of what some of us might feel — which is that we’re just one night of frustrated Netflix scrolling away from canceling the service after its price rises and password-sharing crackdown — the company’s latest earnings reveal that it’s healthier than ever. Netflix, which started life in 1997 as a mail-only DVD service, reported another quarter of subscriber gains, taking its global total to almost 283 million, with user numbers in all four of the company’s major regions growing in the last 12 months. In countries where it is available, more than 50% of signups in the third quarter were for the company’s cheaper ad-supported tier.

Netflix subscriber gains by region
Sherwood News

That result takes Netflix further ahead of its chief rivals, like Disney+, counting roughly 130 million more subscribers than its closest competition. Indeed, as we noted recently, Netflix’s real competition might actually be YouTube. In the six months leading up to July, 25% of all time spent streaming on US televisions was on YouTube, compared to ~20% on Netflix, according to data from Nielsen via Variety.

Streaming subscriber race
Sherwood News

With the most expensive Netflix package now costing $22.99 per month in the US, the company’s business model — which requires spending tens of billions of dollars on content every year — is starting to show the benefits of its scale. It turns out that raising prices, while still growing your customer base, is an unsurprising recipe for success: Netflix’s third quarter was the company’s most profitable in its history, with profits up 41% year on year.

So how is Netflix pulling away from its competition? One factor that’s hard to ignore is that Netflix has simply been in this game — the business of showing you stuff to watch over the internet — longer than anyone else. The company doesn’t have a huge box office business, or theme parks, or an aging cable-TV network to distract it. What they do have is data. In fact, Netflix has more detailed data on what audiences enjoy, what they actually watch and not just what they say they watch, than any organization has ever had. They have data on which parts of the show people skip, which thumbnail is most likely to get clicked on, whether people revisit shows and watch them time and time again, what shows are working better in other regions — and what might be ripe to be plucked from their regional market to go global (think “Squid Game”).

I watched “The Night Agent,” a Netflix spy thriller, last year. I don’t think I’ve recommended it to a single friend to watch. It was completely fine. But for all of its OK-ness, something about it kept me coming back to watch another episode, and I stuck through the whole thing. I wasn’t alone. In fact, “The Night Agent” was Netflix’s most-watched show last year, racking up more than 812 million hours of viewing time. Taking a risk and spending millions of dollars on a show or movie, knowing that it could potentially be a hit like “The Night Agent,” gets easier with each passing quarter for Netflix, as it spreads its enormous content bill across more and more subscribers.

Take the company’s latest earnings as an example to illustrate just where Netflix’s money goes.

With 282.7 million subscribers, we can work out that the average Netflix subscriber was worth $11.60 per month to the company in Q3.

The vast majority of that will be subscription revenue. Some will be from advertising, but the company doesn’t disclose how much yet. So, using our $11.60 figure as our starting point, what does that monthly subscription get spent on?

The economics of Netflix
Sherwood News

A little more than six bucks, or just over half, gets spent on delivering the actual content. That’s the cost of licenses, production, and content delivery. Marketing takes another $0.76, technology and development costs $0.87, and general overheads cost almost $0.50, too. So out of your $11.60 monthly subscription, Netflix is left with a pretty tidy $3.44 in operating profit, which after interest expenses and taxes gets whittled down to $2.79, a still healthy 24% profit margin.

The long-term question is: for how much longer can Netflix keep raising prices? That practice is similar to boiling consumers like frogs, going unnoticed until one day you say, “Hey, this service that used to cost $10 a month is now rapidly approaching the cost of cable TV.”

Interestingly, the company plans to stop disclosing its all-important subscriber numbers next year. Usually, companies deciding to be less transparent is poorly received by investors, but when the profits keep stacking up, it seems you get a pass. Netflix is now worth $324 billion, that’s 85% more than Disney ($175 billion).

Netflix market cap
Sherwood News

More Business

See all Business
Paramount Announces It's Cutting 2,000 Jobs

Paramount improved its Warner Bros. offer to $31 per share

WBD confirmed receipt of the new offer on Tuesday and said it would review the proposal.

Vertical Aerospace Valo Launch

Archer Aviation sues rival Vertical, alleging air taxi design patent infringement

Archer Aviation alleged that Vertical’s Valo aircraft “mimics” its own Midnight aircraft.

business

Paramount is expected to raise its Warner Bros. offer to $32 per share

Paramount’s seven-day window to talk to Warner Bros. Discovery about its best and final offer is set to end at 11:59 p.m. ET on Monday, and the company is expected to finally raise the per-share dollar amount of its bid.

According to reporting by Variety, Paramount’s revised offer is likely to arrive at $32 per share for the HBO and CNN parent.

Paramount’s last major revision to its offer came earlier this month, when it said it would cover the $2.8 billion breakup fee that WBD would owe Netflix in the event of that deal falling apart, and would pay shareholders a “ticking fee” of $0.25 per share for every quarter the deal hasn’t closed after the end of 2026.

Netflix’s next move will be determined by the response of Warner Bros.’ board. Per reporting by Reuters, the streamer has ample cash to increase its own offer for its streaming rival. Analysts at MoffettNathanson Research last week said they expect Netflix to walk away from Warner Bros. if Paramount’s bid comes in “well beyond” $32.

As of Monday at 9 a.m. ET, prediction markets speculating on which company will ultimately come out on top of the bidding war have Netflix at a 46% chance over Paramount’s 43% odds.

Also potentially affecting prediction markets is a Truth Social post by President Trump on Sunday, in which Trump wrote that Netflix must fire board member Susan Rice immediately or "pay the consequences."

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 

Paramount’s last major revision to its offer came earlier this month, when it said it would cover the $2.8 billion breakup fee that WBD would owe Netflix in the event of that deal falling apart, and would pay shareholders a “ticking fee” of $0.25 per share for every quarter the deal hasn’t closed after the end of 2026.

Netflix’s next move will be determined by the response of Warner Bros.’ board. Per reporting by Reuters, the streamer has ample cash to increase its own offer for its streaming rival. Analysts at MoffettNathanson Research last week said they expect Netflix to walk away from Warner Bros. if Paramount’s bid comes in “well beyond” $32.

As of Monday at 9 a.m. ET, prediction markets speculating on which company will ultimately come out on top of the bidding war have Netflix at a 46% chance over Paramount’s 43% odds.

Also potentially affecting prediction markets is a Truth Social post by President Trump on Sunday, in which Trump wrote that Netflix must fire board member Susan Rice immediately or "pay the consequences."

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 
business

Microsoft makes dramatic shake-up to its gaming division as gaming CEO Phil Spencer and Xbox President Sarah Bond depart

Microsoft’s gaming division underwent a major shake-up on Friday, as the tech giant announced the departure of gaming CEO Phil Spencer, who led the division for 12 years and championed its Game Pass subscription service.

Xbox President Sarah Bond is also out, according to Spencer’s memo to employees.

Xbox has fallen significantly behind rivals Sony and Nintendo in recent years. Microsoft raised Xbox console prices twice last year and bumped subscription fees up 50%. In November, the console was even outsold (in unit sales) by the motion-controlled Nex Playground console.

The pair have overseen a shift at Xbox from standard consoles to an array of consoles, handhelds, and various devices and screens accessed via cloud gaming.

Spencer’s replacement as the head of gaming is Microsoft’s president of CoreAI product, Asha Sharma. In a memo to staff, Sharma made three commitments: great games, the “return of Xbox,” and to “invent new business models and new ways to play.”

Xbox has fallen significantly behind rivals Sony and Nintendo in recent years. Microsoft raised Xbox console prices twice last year and bumped subscription fees up 50%. In November, the console was even outsold (in unit sales) by the motion-controlled Nex Playground console.

The pair have overseen a shift at Xbox from standard consoles to an array of consoles, handhelds, and various devices and screens accessed via cloud gaming.

Spencer’s replacement as the head of gaming is Microsoft’s president of CoreAI product, Asha Sharma. In a memo to staff, Sharma made three commitments: great games, the “return of Xbox,” and to “invent new business models and new ways to play.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.