Business
Not doing it: Nike has had a rare misstep

Not doing it: Nike has had a rare misstep

A foot in both camps

Although it sells billions of dollars worth of clothing and equipment every year, Nike is still predominantly in the shoe game, managing to do what most Marketing 101 courses would tell you is impossible — selling footwear for both fashion and performance.

But, recently, Nike seems to have misstepped, as competition from fitness-focused brands such as Hoka and On have started eating into its running business. In its latest quarter, Nike’s footwear sales dropped a concerning 2% in North America, with price rises obfuscating a 10% decline in sales volume — Swiss brand On, which is backed by Roger Federer, reported a 52% jump in sales in its most recent update.

Sneakerheads have long coveted Air Jordans and Air Force 1s, while models such as the Vaporfly were so successful they sparked an entire genre of “super running shoes” — but recent models haven’t been flying off the shelves in the typical Nike fashion.

Direct feedback

Nike’s strategy over the last decade has been all about going direct, selling straight to customers either online or at one of its ~900 stores around the world. For a brand-obsessed business like Nike, this makes a lot of sense.

Owning the distribution gives control over everything from how your sneakers are displayed, to what kind of discounts (if any) you’re willing to give. It also means you make more profit, because there’s no middleman taking a cut. Nike took this strategy far, even breaking up with department store giants like Macy’s — only to come back to the table over the summer.

More Business

See all Business
Daily Life In Warsaw

Smartphones are 12% cheaper than last year, according to the latest inflation data... except they’re not

Phones are one of a few important categories that get quality, or “hedonic,” adjustments in the Consumer Price Index — which make their price go down in the official statistics.

business

Texas sues Netflix, accusing streamer of spying on children and collecting user data without consent

The state of Texas filed a lawsuit Monday against streaming giant Netflix, alleging that the company has built a “behavioral-surveillance program of staggering scale.”

The suit alleges that Netflix is “deceptively designed” to be addictive, using features like autoplay to get viewers hooked, “mining those users for data, and then converting that data into lucrative intelligence for global advertising juggernauts.”

“When you watch Netflix, Netflix watches you,” the lawsuit reads.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.