Business
TSA officer holds shoes
(Tom Brenner/Getty Images)

Paying $200 a year for Clear+ might start looking pretty goofy with the TSA ending its shoe rule

The TSA is set to reverse its nearly 20-year-old policy on shoe removal for passengers.

Rejoice, weary travelers, for there could soon be one less thing for TSA officers to yell at you about.

According to government officials and first reported by travel newsletter Gate Access, the TSA is dropping the nearly 20-year-old rule requiring passengers to remove their shoes, though “selected airports” may still require it until it expands nationwide. Gate Access reports that the shoes-on policy reversal will apply only to those with a Real ID, limiting the change to US residents.

The rule, established in 2006, has been frequently blamed for adding to security line congestion and has certainly driven thousands of frequent fliers to programs like TSA PreCheck and Clear.

Clear shares are trading down about 2% on Tuesday afternoon, implying that investors are seeing less incentive for travelers to continue forking over the $209 each year for the private line-skipping service. Clear+ memberships have climbed by millions in recent years, driving the company’s revenue to $211.4 million in the first quarter, an 18% growth year over year.

But the dip for Clear may be temporary. Gate Access author and former TSA officer Caleb Harmon-Marshall says that the policy change could mark the beginning stages of the dissolution of TSA PreCheck — with Clear or another private company providing the perk in the future. The Trump administration has had the TSA in its sights in its first year, with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy calling it “the #1 travel complaint” in April.

More Business

See all Business
business

Ford reportedly in talks to buy hybrid vehicle batteries from Chinese auto giant BYD

Detroit’s Ford and China’s BYD are said to be in ongoing talks to partner on an agreement that would see Ford buy hybrid vehicle batteries from BYD, according to reporting from The Wall Street Journal.

The report comes just days after President Trump toured a Ford factory in Michigan and implied openness to Chinese automakers coming to the US.

“If they want to come in and build a plant... that’s great, I love that,” Trump said on January 13. “Let China come in, let Japan come in.”

Last week, China’s Geely Automobile Holdings said it expects to make an announcement about expanding into the US within the next three years. Chinese carmakers currently face huge tariffs and software restrictions, effectively barring their vehicles from the US.

Ford has doubled down on hybrid vehicles amid high EV costs and the end of federal EV tax credits. The automaker is currently building a battery plant in Michigan where it plans to use tech from Chinese battery maker CATL.

“If they want to come in and build a plant... that’s great, I love that,” Trump said on January 13. “Let China come in, let Japan come in.”

Last week, China’s Geely Automobile Holdings said it expects to make an announcement about expanding into the US within the next three years. Chinese carmakers currently face huge tariffs and software restrictions, effectively barring their vehicles from the US.

Ford has doubled down on hybrid vehicles amid high EV costs and the end of federal EV tax credits. The automaker is currently building a battery plant in Michigan where it plans to use tech from Chinese battery maker CATL.

Still life of Ozempic and Wegovy with weight scale.

Lawsuit alleges Lilly, Novo locked up telehealth to kill compounded GLP-1s

Novo Nordisk CEO Mike Doustdar estimated that around 1.5 million US patients are using compounded versions of the company’s drugs.

Handshake

Big Pharma enters 2026 with an appetite for deals

At the JPMorgan Healthcare Conference, biotechs and Big Pharma signaled they’re primed for M&A this year, after a big year for deals in 2025.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.