Business
Views Of Dublin Port
General views of Dublin port can be seen on April 12, 2025 (Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)

Pharma imports surged this year as drugmakers grapple with tariff threats

Drugmakers said tax cuts are better than tariffs for encouraging domestic manufacturing. They’re moving production to the US anyway.

The US imported $20 billion more pharmaceutical products in the first three months of 2025 than it did during the same period last year as drugmakers grapple with the unprecedented threat of import taxes on medicines made abroad.

President Trump said Monday that tariffs on pharmaceuticals will be unveiled in the next two weeks, the latest development in a string of threats to tariff the industry. Pharmaceuticals are typically excluded from tariffs under a World Trade Organization agreement that the US signed in 1994.

Drugmakers were fairly unified in their messaging to Wall Street this earnings season, emphasizing that tax cuts are better than tariffs while touting existing and planned domestic manufacturing. Data released from the Commerce Department on Tuesday suggests they’re likely front-running potential tariffs.

In the first quarter of 2025, $68.7 billion in pharmaceutical products were imported compared to $48.7 billion in the same quarter period last year. That data only goes up to March, meaning it doesn’t include the frenzy of threats and mixed messaging fired by Trump since April 2.

David Ricks, CEO of Eli Lilly, told analysts on May 1 the company is behind the “US government’s goals to increase domestic investment.” Like many drugmakers, it manufactures many of its products in Ireland, including its blockbuster weight-loss drug Zepbound, but has announced additional US investment this year.

“However, we don’t believe tariffs are the right mechanism,” Ricks added. He said future tariffs potentially “would have a negative effect on Lilly and for our industry.”

Johnson & Johnson CEO Joaquin Duato said tax cuts would be more enticing than import taxes, a sentiment shared in much of Corporate America. One reason drugmakers are concentrated in Ireland is because of its low corporate tax rate.

“If what you want is to build manufacturing capacity in the US, both in med tech and in pharmaceuticals, the most effective answer is not tariffs but tax policy,” he told analysts on April 15. Amgen CFO Peter H. Griffith said essentially the exact same thing on a May 1 earnings call: “To build on the manufacturing base in the US, we agree with our peers, but the most effective answer is not tariffs, but tax policy.”

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla appeared to suggest the industry might be able to negotiate a way out.

“Right now [we’re] focusing more on the fact that we should not have tariffs,” Bourla told analysts on April 21. “And only if we have, we should try to implement measures.”

More Business

See all Business
business

Danone acquires meal replacement shake maker Huel for ~$1.2 billion

Very big things are happening today in the world of nutritionally complete products that taste like chalk, as Danone has agreed to buy the celebrity-backed protein bar, powder, meal, and meal replacement shake maker Huel for €1 billion, or around $1.2 billion.

In a statement announcing the acquisition, Danone — apparently the No. 1 yogurt producer in the US and the nation’s top plant-based food and beverage company as well — said that buying Huel will enhance its “presence in functional nutrition and extend its portfolio into the fast-growing Complete Nutrition space.” Danone, the parent company behind Evian and Actimel, also praised Huel’s “best-in-class digital execution” and fan bases across the UK, Europe, and the US.

Bulking season

Huel, a portmanteau of “human” and “fuel,” was only set up just over a decade ago, but thanks to its marketing efforts, a buzzy product range that marries on-the-go eating with nutrient-dense, plant-based ingredients, and a decent list of (mostly UK-based) celebrity investors, like actor Idris Elba and talk show host Jonathan Ross, sales have soared.

business

China’s EV startup trio have all become profitable

China’s EV startup trio, Nio, Li Auto, and XPeng, are now all profitable, following the latter’s Q4 results released Friday.

XPeng reported a quarterly net profit of about $55 million, compared to rival Nio’s Q4 net profit (also its first) of about $40 million. Li Auto posted Q4 net profit of less than $1 million.

All three companies being profitable offers a stark contrast to the EV market in the US, where Rivian quietly delayed its 2027 profitability target in a filing about its Uber robotaxi partnership yesterday. Lucid is likely further away, and last month cut 12% of its US workforce as part of its “path toward profitability.”

Still, it’s not all rosy for China’s EV startups, either. XPeng ADRs were down more than 6% in Friday morning trading as its Q1 sales forecast came in below estimates. As China rolls back subsidies, auto sales are slumping. Chinese retail EV and hybrid sales fell 32% in February from the same month last year.

9.3%

As the war with Iran produces the biggest spike in US gas prices since Hurricane Katrina, car retailer CarMax is continuing to see heightened interest in EVs, hybrids, and plug-in hybrids.

“From Feb 1st - March 1st (inclusive), compared to March 2nd to March 15th (inclusive), we saw a 9.3% lift in page views for these vehicles,” a spokesperson for the company told Sherwood News.

As industry insiders recently told us, EV interest climbs when gas prices rise. That appears to be holding true even without EV tax credits, which the Trump administration ended under its new budget package.

CarMax also saw EV searches spike in 2022, amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the resulting oil price spike.

Walt Disney Chairman And CEO Bob Iger Rings Opening Bell At NY Stock Exchange

It’s the end of Disney’s Iger era (again)

Incoming CEO Josh D’Amaro is replacing Bob Iger on Wednesday, though Iger will remain a senior adviser through the end of the year.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.