Business
Luckin Vs. Starbucks
(Future Publishing/Getty Images)
Grounds for divorce?

Starbucks is really struggling in America — in China, things are much worse

New CEO Brian Niccol has serious work to do.

David Crowther, Tom Jones
Updated 10/23/24 9:38AM

The world’s largest coffee chain is losing customers. Yesterday, Starbucks reported that its profits (earnings per share) fell by 25% in the last year, driven by a major slowdown in the US. In short, Americans went to Starbucks a lot less but paid more when they got there: comparable US transaction volumes fell 10% in the quarter, but were offset by a 4% rise in the average ticket size (for a net fall of ~6%).

That’s a bitter brew to swallow for new CEO Brian Niccol, who only started in September, as he works to implement his “Back to Starbucks” strategy, which includes reestablishing Starbucks as “the community coffeehouse.”

But the problems in the American business look relatively mild compared to China — a market where Starbucks has spent billions of dollars opening more than 7,000 restaurants in the last 2.5 decades. There, comparable store sales are almost in free fall. Per Starbucks:

“China comparable store sales declined 14%, driven by an 8% decline in average ticket compounded by a 6% decline in comparable transactions, weighed down by intensified competition and a soft macro environment that impacted consumer spending.”

So, unlike in the US, there’s a double shot of disappointment for the coffee giant in China: people are going to Starbucks less and spending less when they get there.

US transactions: -10%
US ticket size: +4%
China transactions: -8%
China ticket size: -6%

In premarket trading this morning, Starbucks shares were trading 5% lower, although they have since recovered much of their early losses. The company has suspended its financial guidance for 2025.

Ground to a halt

As we wrote earlier this year, Starbucks’ China business has been strained for years. Despite the company’s relentless expansion in China, same-store sales in the country have been falling. Since the start of 2019, the company has nearly doubled its store count in the country — sales haven’t followed anywhere near the same trajectory.

Starbucks’ sales in China haven’t kept up with its store openings
Sherwood News

The company has been running just to stay still, as competition from domestic companies like Luckin Coffee intensifies, putting pressure on Starbucks at a time when Chinese consumers are growing increasingly fond of homegrown brands rather than Western imports.

By the time Luckin Coffee was even founded (2017), Starbucks’ business in China was a teenager, with the first of the American coffeehouses opened all the way back in 1999 in Beijing. It took just a few short years, even with a nearly fatal accounting scandal thrown in the mix, for Luckin Coffee to overtake Starbucks’ footprint — and this summer the company celebrated opening its 20,000th store, the result of a hypergrowth strategy that has spread the chain across much of mainland China.

Starbucks vs. Luckin Coffee
Sherwood News

Culturally known for a love of tea, China has become a coffee-addicted country, and just like consumers in America, China’s caffeine-seekers are price sensitive. With beverages that are reportedly ~30% cheaper than those offered by Starbucks, Luckin Coffee’s rapid expansion, which makes heavy use of mobile ordering, has been extraordinary.

In the last two years, Luckin has opened 12,729 stores — the equivalent of opening 17 new outlets every single day.

In light of Luckin’s remarkable growth and the increasing competition in the battle to caffeinate China’s coffee-loving population, Starbucks looked to lean on a long-standing and successful part of the business earlier this year: rewards.

Starbucks 40 million rewards members
Sherwood News

The company rolled out some big upgrades to its rewards offering in China over the summer — including a collab with the Hilton Group in the region to allow customers to sync their loyalty accounts for the two chains — to entice customers away from homeland alternatives. And who can blame them for trying? Starbucks’ rewards program has proved a huge hit around the world, counting 34 million active users in the US alone. In fact, the amount of cash that Starbs loyalists have sitting in their rewards accounts often runs into the billions each quarter, sparking regular discourse around whether the company should be actively investing those assets.

The rewards-strategy efforts won’t necessarily be music to Brian Niccol’s ears, though, with the new chief reportedly looking to move away from offering so many promos, deals, and discounts going forward. His aversion to relying on rewards aside, the Starbucks CEO has a bigger question to answer when it comes to China: if same-store sales keep dropping, how long can the chain afford to keep expanding there?

That question is an important one. But then again, lots of questions about Starbucks’ business — whether its workers will keep unionizing in droves, if it can revitalize the core US coffeehouses, and whether the Pumpkin Spice Latte was brought out too early this year — seem pressing.

More Business

See all Business
business

Paramount is expected to raise its Warner Bros. offer to $32 per share

Paramount’s seven-day window to talk to Warner Bros. Discovery about its best and final offer is set to end at 11:59 p.m. ET on Monday, and the company is expected to finally raise the per-share dollar amount of its bid.

According to reporting by Variety, Paramount’s revised offer is likely to arrive at $32 per share for the HBO and CNN parent.

Paramount’s last major revision to its offer came earlier this month, when it said it would cover the $2.8 billion breakup fee that WBD would owe Netflix in the event of that deal falling apart, and would pay shareholders a “ticking fee” of $0.25 per share for every quarter the deal hasn’t closed after the end of 2026.

Netflix’s next move will be determined by the response of Warner Bros.’ board. Per reporting by Reuters, the streamer has ample cash to increase its own offer for its streaming rival. Analysts at MoffettNathanson Research last week said they expect Netflix to walk away from Warner Bros. if Paramount’s bid comes in “well beyond” $32.

As of Monday at 9 a.m. ET, prediction markets speculating on which company will ultimately come out on top of the bidding war have Netflix at a 46% chance over Paramount’s 43% odds.

Also potentially affecting prediction markets is a Truth Social post by President Trump on Sunday, in which Trump wrote that Netflix must fire board member Susan Rice immediately or "pay the consequences."

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 

Paramount’s last major revision to its offer came earlier this month, when it said it would cover the $2.8 billion breakup fee that WBD would owe Netflix in the event of that deal falling apart, and would pay shareholders a “ticking fee” of $0.25 per share for every quarter the deal hasn’t closed after the end of 2026.

Netflix’s next move will be determined by the response of Warner Bros.’ board. Per reporting by Reuters, the streamer has ample cash to increase its own offer for its streaming rival. Analysts at MoffettNathanson Research last week said they expect Netflix to walk away from Warner Bros. if Paramount’s bid comes in “well beyond” $32.

As of Monday at 9 a.m. ET, prediction markets speculating on which company will ultimately come out on top of the bidding war have Netflix at a 46% chance over Paramount’s 43% odds.

Also potentially affecting prediction markets is a Truth Social post by President Trump on Sunday, in which Trump wrote that Netflix must fire board member Susan Rice immediately or "pay the consequences."

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 
business

Microsoft makes dramatic shake-up to its gaming division as gaming CEO Phil Spencer and Xbox President Sarah Bond depart

Microsoft’s gaming division underwent a major shake-up on Friday, as the tech giant announced the departure of gaming CEO Phil Spencer, who led the division for 12 years and championed its Game Pass subscription service.

Xbox President Sarah Bond is also out, according to Spencer’s memo to employees.

Xbox has fallen significantly behind rivals Sony and Nintendo in recent years. Microsoft raised Xbox console prices twice last year and bumped subscription fees up 50%. In November, the console was even outsold (in unit sales) by the motion-controlled Nex Playground console.

The pair have overseen a shift at Xbox from standard consoles to an array of consoles, handhelds, and various devices and screens accessed via cloud gaming.

Spencer’s replacement as the head of gaming is Microsoft’s president of CoreAI product, Asha Sharma. In a memo to staff, Sharma made three commitments: great games, the “return of Xbox,” and to “invent new business models and new ways to play.”

Xbox has fallen significantly behind rivals Sony and Nintendo in recent years. Microsoft raised Xbox console prices twice last year and bumped subscription fees up 50%. In November, the console was even outsold (in unit sales) by the motion-controlled Nex Playground console.

The pair have overseen a shift at Xbox from standard consoles to an array of consoles, handhelds, and various devices and screens accessed via cloud gaming.

Spencer’s replacement as the head of gaming is Microsoft’s president of CoreAI product, Asha Sharma. In a memo to staff, Sharma made three commitments: great games, the “return of Xbox,” and to “invent new business models and new ways to play.”

business

Judge rejects Tesla’s attempt to overturn $243 million verdict over fatal 2019 autopilot crash

Tesla’s effort to appeal a $243 million jury verdict related to a fatal 2019 crash that occurred when a Tesla vehicle was in self-driving mode was rejected by a federal judge in a ruling made public on Friday.

Tesla is expected to appeal the decision to a higher court.

The case was the first federal lawsuit surrounding an autopilot death to go to a jury trial for Tesla. In August, a jury found the automaker 33% responsible for the 2019 crash. The jury determined that Tesla was partly to blame for enabling the driver to take his eyes off the road, and the company was ordered to pay an additional $200 million in punitive damages.

Tesla reportedly turned down a $60 million settlement offer prior to the trial. According to Electrek, dozens of similar cases involving the EV maker are working through the court system.

This month, Tesla stopped using the term “autopilot” in its marketing in order to avoid a sales ban in California. Tesla appears to have replaced the term with “Traffic Aware Cruise Control” and added “supervised” to its mentions of Full Self-Driving tech.

The case was the first federal lawsuit surrounding an autopilot death to go to a jury trial for Tesla. In August, a jury found the automaker 33% responsible for the 2019 crash. The jury determined that Tesla was partly to blame for enabling the driver to take his eyes off the road, and the company was ordered to pay an additional $200 million in punitive damages.

Tesla reportedly turned down a $60 million settlement offer prior to the trial. According to Electrek, dozens of similar cases involving the EV maker are working through the court system.

This month, Tesla stopped using the term “autopilot” in its marketing in order to avoid a sales ban in California. Tesla appears to have replaced the term with “Traffic Aware Cruise Control” and added “supervised” to its mentions of Full Self-Driving tech.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.