Business
Cartoon of family Watching TV
(Getty Images)
Unskippable

Streaming dominates TV ad dollars for the second year in a row, but eyeballs are getting cheaper

New data from Media Dynamics shows streaming dominating television’s ad spend for the second year.

Max Knoblauch

Ads are still relatively new to streaming, but the business is already dominant in terms of dollars spent.

Streaming scooped up about 43% of advertisers’ television spending at the industry’s “upfront,” new data from tracking firm Media Dynamics shows. Per the firm, advertisers spent $13.2 billion on streaming ad space during the annual event and selling period, when networks sell the majority of their upcoming commercial space to advertisers.

The total marks a $2 billion increase from last year.

Meanwhile, both broadcast and cable TV saw pullback from advertisers, as viewers continue to spend the majority of their time on streaming services like Netflix and YouTube. According to the Nielsen Gauge, streamers scooped up 46% of television viewing time in June, compared to 23% for cable and 19% for broadcast.

Ironically, live sports and appointment viewing (once linear TV’s bread and butter) helped drive spending for streamers. Netflix on Thursday said it sold out the entirety of its in-game inventory for its two NFL Christmas Day games this year — the second consecutive year advertisers have gobbled up the spots. Netflix reportedly pays about $75 million per game for the rights.

Though Netflix doesn’t report its ad revenue, the company said it received double the number of commitments from advertisers this year. NBCUniversal, which will stream the Super Bowl this year, last month said it’s received 15% more ad commitments this year.

Advertiser hunger for sports has sent television rights deals surging. Paramount Skydance this week struck a seven-year deal to stream UFC fights for about $1.1 billion annually, double what Disney’s ESPN previously paid to broadcast the contests.

As streamers race to build up their ad businesses, the swelling of actual ad space has sent rates down across television categories. Per Media Dynamics, the rate streamers charge to reach 1,000 viewers has fallen by about $8 since the 2023 season.

With a roughly 15-year head start in advertising, YouTube is still firmly in the lead. Last month, the company reported $9.8 billion in ad revenue in its second quarter. That’s close to Netflix’s total revenue, including subscriptions, which was $11.08 billion in the same period.

More Business

See all Business
Daily Life In Warsaw

Smartphones are 12% cheaper than last year, according to the latest inflation data... except they’re not

Phones are one of a few important categories that get quality, or “hedonic,” adjustments in the Consumer Price Index — which make their price go down in the official statistics.

business

Texas sues Netflix, accusing streamer of spying on children and collecting user data without consent

The state of Texas filed a lawsuit Monday against streaming giant Netflix, alleging that the company has built a “behavioral-surveillance program of staggering scale.”

The suit alleges that Netflix is “deceptively designed” to be addictive, using features like autoplay to get viewers hooked, “mining those users for data, and then converting that data into lucrative intelligence for global advertising juggernauts.”

“When you watch Netflix, Netflix watches you,” the lawsuit reads.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.