Culture
Peak content: Apple & Paramount are considering teaming up

Peak content: Apple & Paramount are considering teaming up

Paramount+ and Apple TV+ could soon be tied together, as the parent companies of the 2 streamers explore the possibility of bundling the services, per reporting from the Wall Street Journal on Friday.

Currently, an Apple TV+ subscription sets US viewers back $9.99 per month, while a Paramount+ Essential subscription (without Showtime) is $5.99/mo. The rumored tie-up would supposedly be cheaper than subscribing to both individually, and comes amidst a wave of industry change, as streamers explore everything from price increases, content culls, and bundling to keep their audiences' attention.

Quality, quantity, both… or neither?

The idea of a bundle makes a lot of sense for Paramount and Apple, which have significantly smaller libraries than their competitors. Apple’s offering is particularly lean, with data from Reelgood showing just over 200 titles on Apple TV+, less than 2% of the ~14,000 available on Amazon Prime Video.

Indeed, despite leaning into quality rather than quantity — with shows like Ted Lasso and Severance getting good marks from critics — Apple TV+ still sees an increasing number of customers canceling, with the churn rate on the platform rising every month between May and September, per Variety.

I’ve seen this one before

Industry experts have been predicting content combinations for some time now, and polling suggests that consumers might also be onboard: 64% reportedly wish there was a service to bundle all of their streaming subscriptions.

More Culture

See all Culture
Doctor Working on Robot Woman

The peptide gold rush: How impending deregulation could supercharge a shadow industry

Peptides, the gray-market supplements that have flooded Silicon Valley, may soon make their way into the mainstream. Who stands to benefit?

culture
Saleah Blancaflor

Prediction markets show “One Battle After Another” leads in Oscar race for Best Picture

It’s finally Oscars week — and with voting officially closed, all that’s left to do is count the ballots and wait to see who wins this Sunday night. 

This year, the acting categories have been the most interesting to watch, especially the showdown between “Marty Supreme” star Timothée Chalamet and “Sinners” actor Michael B. Jordan for Best Actor. While Chalamet was long the favorite, Jordan has caught up and overtaken him after winning the Actor Award.

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

But perhaps the most exciting race of all is for Best Picture. Out of the 10 nominees, the two at the top are Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” and Ryan Coogler’s “Sinners,” both of which are studio releases from Warner Bros. Discovery

Which will win the top prize seems to be split among award pundits and experts. As of Monday afternoon, Gold Derby still has “One Battle After Another” as the front-runner with odds of 76.87%. AwardsWatch, AwardsRadar, and Numlock Awards are also still predicting that “One Battle After Another” will take the statue for Best Picture.

On the other side, reporters from some major trade publications like Variety’s Clayton Davis and The Hollywood Reporter’s Scott Feinberg predict that “Sinners” will take the top honor.

Odds in the prediction markets currently show that “One Battle After Another” is still ahead of “Sinners,” with the former priced in at 75% while the latter is priced at 23%.

Loading...
 
Loading...
 

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.