Culture
The comeback never happened...

BoxedOffice

RIP the golden age of cinema

Boxing Match on TV
Boxing Match on TV

The box office: A new normal (Pt. 2)

Denis Villeneuve’s Dune: Part Two, one of the most hotly-anticipated movies of 2024, has won acclaim from critics and audiences alike… which is exactly what America’s box office needed after a string of record-low weekends and high-profile flops.

Updated 4/2/24 6:01PM

Sleep yea‍r

Covid era aside, 2024 has been one of the drowsiest starts to a cinematic year for almost 3 decades: January faltered, and theaters are just about crawling away from last month — enthused by the promise of Dune 2 — with hopes of leaving one of the weakest months in modern box office history firmly in the rear view mirror. Indeed, if you exclude the pandemic years (2020-2022), then February 2024 was the lowest-grossing month at the US box office since September 1997 — and that’s not even accounting for inflation.

The New Normal Part 2: America’s Box Office Hasn’t Bounced Back

RIP the golden age of cinema

While Jan and Feb have long been known as The Dump Months — a period when Hollywood studios clean house and release some of their less choice offerings — last month’s $362 million total domestic gross figure could be a reflection not only of a quieter slate, but of a more troubling fact: that the box office is never going back to what it once was.

Even the old reliable superhero genre hasn’t been enough to boost this year’s lackluster takings. Sony’s latest installment in its ever-tangling series of Spiderman-adjacent movies, Madame Web, has so far served only as a cultural and critical punching bag following 2 disappointing weekends that saw it recoup just $79 million around the world — some way off its estimated $150-200 million break-even threshold. Dune 2 has a lot of pressure on its shoulders.

Fantastic fall

Whether you, like Martin Scorsese, think that Marvel’s gargantuan cast of characters and other superhero films have devoured the concept of “cinema” as we know it, spitting out a vague blob where one of the most beloved art forms once stood, or you think they’re frankly just a lot of fun for a couple of hours, there’s no denying that supers have lost some of their powers.

Superhero Movies Might Not Save Cinema After All

In 2021, superhero films took a record-breaking 32% share of the domestic box office, more than any other single genre, according to box office data site The Numbers. That year, Marvel had just kicked off its multi-billion dollar Multiverse saga, releasing 4 films which ended up grossing a staggering ~$3.1 billion worldwide, some $1.4 billion of which was in North America alone, while Sony’s Venom sequel did $214 million at home and $507 million around the globe.

Déjà vu

Since then, however, the fortunes of the genre — whose films have been criticized for boiling down to “keep glowy thing away from bad guy” — haven’t burned as brightly. Take 2023, for example, when Marvel released The Marvels; an effort that ended up being its lowest-grossing picture of all time and the only one not to make $100 million domestically. All told, superhero movies accounted for just under 17% of the domestic box office last year, as critics continued to explore the death of the genre with increasing fervor.

This year, mostly owing to the aforementioned disaster that is Madame Web, the figure has slumped further to just ~10% at the time of writing — however, with some big-name sequels and threequels lined up in 2024, that is likely to tick up a little before the year is out. While it’s yet to be seen if a fleet of follow ups in the super space will be enough to reinvigorate the genre, pitching sequels and reboots remains a reliable strategy for studios.

Sequels part 2: into the unknown

‍Indeed, though we’ve charted about “sequelitis” a lot in the past, filmmakers' appetite for risk only appears to be diminishing. Recent analysis from EntTelligence, for example, revealed that just 5 of the 60 highest grossing films since 2016 (not including 2020) can be classified as “true original” titles, as opposed to sequels, IP reboots or rehashes.

While complaining about sequels is nothing new, the proliferation of second, third, fourth, and fifth parts has had a profound effect on the titles of the biggest movies on our screens.

The Rise Of Numbers & Colons In Movie Titles

Digits and dots

Looking at the 10 biggest movies of each year from 1995 to 2000, just 7 movie titles contained numbers or colons that denoted a sequel, such as The Lost World: Jurassic Park from ‘97 or Toy Story 2 from ‘99. Since then, however, a world building surge has meant that movie makers (and marketing departments) have needed to change up title formats, slipping in subtitles preceded by colons, or nudging numbers into whichever Fast and Furious installment they’re onto now. Indeed, nearly half of the top grossing films of the last 5 years contained either a colon or numerical figure that indicated sequel status.

We may not even have seen “peak sequel”. In 2023 book You Are What You Watch, Walt Hickey posits an interesting distinction: sequels and movies that rely on old IP aren’t born from crazed searches for profit, but rather on the studios’ need for a reliable means of “not losing money” — tried and tested remakes appeal to “risk-aversion motivation”, offering a rare reprieve for the industry as eyes shift elsewhere.

Not All Prices Go Up: The Cost Of A Television Has Plummeted Since 2000

Home cinema

Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics reveals that the cost of televisions as a category have fallen an astounding 98% since 2000. A 55-inch TV, which even 15 years ago would have cost a smallfortune, can now be picked up for just $250 from any number of retailers.

So, despite the stratospheric success of some stand out blockbusters like Tom Cruise’s Top Gun follow up, the Avatar sequel, and Barbenheimer last year, the US box office still hasn’t quite bounced back to where it was before theaters were shuttered across America. If there’s one thing we know about Hollywood, however, it’s that everyone’s always holding out for a strong follow up.

More Culture

See all Culture
culture
Saleah Blancaflor

Drake whiffs on an expected No. 1 on Spotify

Drake started at the bottom and he’s here, but not quite at the top... of Spotify, at least.

It’s been nearly three weeks since Drake dropped his three surprise albums — “Iceman,” “Habibti,” and “Maid of Honour.” Heading into the month, prediction markets were rating it a near certainty, a 98% chance, that Drake’s sonic onslaught was enough to snag the No. 1 slot on Spotify at least once in June.

But, while he surpassed the late Michael Jackson and took up three slots on the Billboard album chart at once, his newly released songs haven’t quite cracked the popular music-streaming platform’s top charts, and market seem to think the moment has passed.

Loading...
 

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Spotify’s “Top Songs - Global” chart currently show that Jackson’s “Billie Jean,” which is more than four decades old, Justin Bieber’s “Beauty and a Beat,” which climbed back to the top of Spotify charts following his Coachella set in the spring, Olivia Rodrigo’s new angsty love song “The Cure,” and BTS’s “Swim” are all ahead of Drake’s “STFU Janice” from his “Iceman” album.

While Spotify previously reported last month that Drake’s “Make Them Cry” was the most streamed album in a single day this year, that was later revealed to be a data error.

Prediction markets currently show traders are betting there’s only a 15% chance Drake will have a No. 1 song on Spotify in June.

Meanwhile, Taylor Swift is in the lead at 98% — a day before the release of her new original song “I Knew It, I Knew You,” which she wrote and performed for Disney and Pixar’s upcoming “Toy Story 5” — followed by Olivia Rodrigo, whose highly anticipated album “You Seem Pretty Sad for a Girl So in Love” comes out next Friday.

Loading...
 

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Spotify’s “Top Songs - Global” chart currently show that Jackson’s “Billie Jean,” which is more than four decades old, Justin Bieber’s “Beauty and a Beat,” which climbed back to the top of Spotify charts following his Coachella set in the spring, Olivia Rodrigo’s new angsty love song “The Cure,” and BTS’s “Swim” are all ahead of Drake’s “STFU Janice” from his “Iceman” album.

While Spotify previously reported last month that Drake’s “Make Them Cry” was the most streamed album in a single day this year, that was later revealed to be a data error.

Prediction markets currently show traders are betting there’s only a 15% chance Drake will have a No. 1 song on Spotify in June.

Meanwhile, Taylor Swift is in the lead at 98% — a day before the release of her new original song “I Knew It, I Knew You,” which she wrote and performed for Disney and Pixar’s upcoming “Toy Story 5” — followed by Olivia Rodrigo, whose highly anticipated album “You Seem Pretty Sad for a Girl So in Love” comes out next Friday.

Pokemon cards

GameStop’s collectibles business just keeps booming, as “Pokémon” cards continue to fly

Collectibles revenue grew 65% year over year in its latest quarter.

culture
Saleah Blancaflor

Will critics and audiences go out of this world for Steven Spielberg’s “Disclosure Day”?

Legendary director Steven Spielberg is back with his first film in four years.

While 2022s Oscar-nominated The Fabelmans was a semi-autobiographical film, it looks like hes back to his sci-fi roots with the upcoming release of Universal Pictures Disclosure Day.

The movie stars Emily Blunt, Josh O’Connor, Colin Firth, Eve Hewson, and Colman Domingo, and follows a cybersecurity whistleblower (O’Connor) and meteorologist (Blunt) who work together to uncover government secrets and expose the truth about extraterrestrial life.

Some first reactions out of early screenings shared on social media have been praising the film so far. Germain Lussier, a senior entertainment reporter at Gizmodo, posted on X that the movie is Spielberg’s “best film in 20 years,” while many have praised Blunt’s performance as one of her best. Others have said it is reminiscent of the filmmaker’s other sci-fi classics like “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” and “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial.”

To be considered “fresh,” movies have to receive at least 60% on Rotten Tomatoes. While the global embargo for formal reviews doesn’t lift until Tuesday, June 9, at 12 p.m. ET following more advance screenings in Los Angeles, New York, and other cities ahead of the June 12 release date, traders on prediction markets are currently betting there is a 68% chance that the movie will score above 85% on the site.

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 

The movie stars Emily Blunt, Josh O’Connor, Colin Firth, Eve Hewson, and Colman Domingo, and follows a cybersecurity whistleblower (O’Connor) and meteorologist (Blunt) who work together to uncover government secrets and expose the truth about extraterrestrial life.

Some first reactions out of early screenings shared on social media have been praising the film so far. Germain Lussier, a senior entertainment reporter at Gizmodo, posted on X that the movie is Spielberg’s “best film in 20 years,” while many have praised Blunt’s performance as one of her best. Others have said it is reminiscent of the filmmaker’s other sci-fi classics like “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” and “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial.”

To be considered “fresh,” movies have to receive at least 60% on Rotten Tomatoes. While the global embargo for formal reviews doesn’t lift until Tuesday, June 9, at 12 p.m. ET following more advance screenings in Los Angeles, New York, and other cities ahead of the June 12 release date, traders on prediction markets are currently betting there is a 68% chance that the movie will score above 85% on the site.

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.