Markets
Cisco shares return to dotcom era high
Former Cisco CEO John Chambers, back in 1997 (Daniel Sheehan/Getty Images)

After a quarter century, Cisco surpasses dot-com bubble closing high

Cisco hit a new closing high on Wednesday, and in doing so finally surpassed the dot-com era peak that briefly made the tech hardware company the world’s most valuable corporation a quarter century ago.

Even after Thursday’s retreat, Cisco is up more than 30% for the year. Shares are on track for their second-best annual gain of the last 15 years, thanks in part to the company’s efforts to boost its profile in the AI data center boom.

(It has recently announced new products such as an optimized data center switches developed in partnership with Nvidia, and plans to take part in a data center joint venture with AMD and Saudi Arabia’s state-backed AI firm, Humain.)

And in a sense, 25-year round-trip journey for the share price tidily links two eras of technological and market ebullience.

A quarter century ago, Cisco was arguably the central player in an investment binge on a then new technology — the internet — that most thought was certain to remake the entire the US economy. (Spoiler: it did.)

In those days, Cisco’s products — switches, fiber-optic routers, and other communications gear that, as The Wall Street Journal wrote at the time, “enable computers to talk to one another” — were considered central to the internet’s growth.

And Cisco’s sales soared throughout the late 1990s, thanks to exploding demand and a flurry of acquisitions — it bought 73 companies from 1993 to 2000, according to Businessweek. From 1995 to 2000, revenue grew at an average rate of nearly 60% per year.

Along the way, investors fell in love with the stock, as it rose by roughly 4,000% between the end of 1994 and its zenith in March 2000. When its value peaked late that month at more than $550 billion, the 14-year-old company had elbowed past both Microsoft and General Electric to the top of the world’s corporate ranks.

Analysts extrapolated growth out from there, penciling in annual sales increases of more than 35% for the next two years.

In its story on Cisco attaining top-dog status in terms of corporate market cap, The Wall Street Journal reported that “Paul Weinstein, an analyst at Credit Suisse First Boston, forecast Cisco would become the world’s first company with a market value of $1 trillion.”

And just then, when things looked brightest, Cisco’s time in the sun was pretty much over. It wouldn’t see that closing high of $80.06 again until Wednesday.

Why? Well, things changed.

The investment boom focusing on rewiring the US economy for the web era suddenly started to slow in late 2000 and early 2001. And instead of growing at 35%, Cisco sales contracted in both its fiscal 2002 and 2003.

The result was a painful period both for Cisco employees — it shed 40,000 between 2001 and 2003 — and investors, who endured a collapse of nearly 90% in Cisco’s share price, before the worst was over in late 2002.

Cisco’s 25-year rebound back to dot-com highs surely shows the wisdom of holding on to stocks for the long run, right?

Well, even setting aside Keynes’ famous quip that in the long run, we’re all dead, that’s not exactly true. With the stock above $80, individual Cisco shareholders who have held since the late 1990s are back to where they started — but in aggregate, Cisco still isn't worth what it used to be.

That’s because Cisco has far fewer shares outstanding than it once did. (The company is a huge repurchaser of its shares.)

And as a result, its market value — basically stock price multiplied by shares outstanding — is still well below the total amount of shareholder wealth that once existed in the company. In fact, the value of the company, in terms of market capitalization, is roughly $250 billion lower than at its 2000 peak, when its share price climbed this high.

The saga of Cisco shows just how difficult it is — even for a company at the epicenter of a boom, like Cisco 25 years ago, or dare we say... Nvidia today — to know precisely where one stands when caught in the middle of a massive wave of investment and optimism such as the one supercharging the US market and economy right now.

And perhaps just as important, Cisco’s road back to its all-time high shows how just how difficult it is to return to those glory days once they’ve past.

More Markets

See all Markets
Crowd of businessmen with multiple expressions

Corporate America won't shut up about agentic AI, or AI in general

In fact, executives are saying the word “AI” more than they’re saying “earnings” on earnings calls.

markets

Space, drone, and satellite stocks continue their Iran war-driven rally

Space, drone, and satellite stocks like Rocket Lab, Redwire, Intuitive Machines, AST SpaceMobile, and Planet Labs are outperforming both broader indexes and the thematic baskets of momentum stocks and shares with high retail sentiment with which they are often lumped.

There’s little clear news on the tape to attribute for the move higher. (Though the FAA did announce a streamlining of launch licensing rules that cover a number of these companies, including Rocket Lab and Firefly Aerospace, as well as Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s commercial space giant, SpaceX.)

More broadly, the outbreak of war with Iran has burnished the space, drone, and satellite sector in the eyes of investors, as the conflict underscores the importance of the three technologies to the future of defense. And in a world where nations are growing unsure of traditional alliances, countries across the board will look to boost their own capabilities. (Belgium just announced that it has selected Redwire, for example, to provide its first national security satellite system. Belgium!)

As Goldman Sachs analysts put it in a research note from January:

“Companies with native drone and satellite technology cultures like AeroVironment and Rocket Lab may find themselves particularly well positioned. And in Europe, a remilitarization of the Continent is underway that could require a $160bn investment over the next 5 years just to catch up with Russia.”

Since the start of the Iran war, most of these types of shares have handily outpaced the Nasdaq Composite Index. Rocket Lab, Redwire, and Intuitive Machines are all up more than 12% during that period, compared to a Nasdaq that’s just slightly in the red, as of shortly before 12 p.m. ET on Tuesday.

Jensen Huang GTC 2026 San Jose

Nvidia keeps giving Wall Street everything it wants — without getting rewarded

Yet another case of good financial news from Nvidia failing to generate an enduring positive reaction.

markets

Oklo surges after receiving approval for next phase in the construction of its first reactor

Revenue-free retail favorite Oklo is up in early trading after announcing regulatory updates on its first product, a reactor it calls Aurora, which it has started building at the US Energy Department’s primary nuclear energy research and development center, the Idaho National Laboratory.

Oklo announced that it signed an “other transaction agreement” (OTA) with the Department of Energy early Tuesday. (OTAs are typically used by the federal government to enter into research, prototyping, and production deals with private entities outside of the typical procurement processes.)

Oklo also announced that the DOE’s Idaho Operations Office also signed off on a preliminary safety design review for the reactor, which is expected to be completed sometime in late 2027 or 2028. The company broke ground on the project in September.

Separately, Oklo also announced that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a materials license enabling an Oklo subsidiary to handle, process, and distribute isotopes.

“This is Oklo’s first NRC-issued license and supports the transition from design and planning to real-world execution and progress,” the company said.

Given the close involvement of the federal government in the development of nuclear power plants, Oklo’s close ties to the Trump administration have been seen as an important advantage for the company — but have also drawn scrutiny and criticism.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright was formerly a board member at Oklo, before he was tapped to lead the Trump administration’s Department of Energy.

The department is playing a more prominent role in the nuclear regulatory process under an executive order designed to speed up approval of new nuclear energy technologies.

Separately, Oklo is due to report earnings after the close of trading on Tuesday.

Oklo announced that it signed an “other transaction agreement” (OTA) with the Department of Energy early Tuesday. (OTAs are typically used by the federal government to enter into research, prototyping, and production deals with private entities outside of the typical procurement processes.)

Oklo also announced that the DOE’s Idaho Operations Office also signed off on a preliminary safety design review for the reactor, which is expected to be completed sometime in late 2027 or 2028. The company broke ground on the project in September.

Separately, Oklo also announced that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a materials license enabling an Oklo subsidiary to handle, process, and distribute isotopes.

“This is Oklo’s first NRC-issued license and supports the transition from design and planning to real-world execution and progress,” the company said.

Given the close involvement of the federal government in the development of nuclear power plants, Oklo’s close ties to the Trump administration have been seen as an important advantage for the company — but have also drawn scrutiny and criticism.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright was formerly a board member at Oklo, before he was tapped to lead the Trump administration’s Department of Energy.

The department is playing a more prominent role in the nuclear regulatory process under an executive order designed to speed up approval of new nuclear energy technologies.

Separately, Oklo is due to report earnings after the close of trading on Tuesday.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.