Markets
In this photo illustration a Reddit logo is seen on a mobile...
(Pavlo Gonchar/Getty Images)
Weird Money

How a Canadian carpenter became an options trader, made $300 million, and then went bust

The trader, who made and lost his fortune trading Tesla options, is suing RBC, claiming the bank’s at fault.

Jack Raines

Like many of us, Christopher DeVocht, a carpenter from Vancouver, developed a propensity for trading stocks during the pandemic. Unlike most of us, however, he was pretty good at trading stocks, turning C$88,000 into C$415 million ($306 million) between 2019 and 2022.

And then he lost it all.

On October 1, 2024, DeVocht filed a lawsuit against the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) and accounting firm Grant Thornton, for, among other things, costing him C$415 million. I read through the court filing, and the details of this case are wild. 

According to the civil claim filing, in his early 20s, DeVocht regularly lost money day-trading in a personal account that he had opened through RBC, but he kept dumping more money into his account, primarily to trade Tesla. In 2019, as Tesla’s stock price climbed, his portfolio grew to C$88,000, and DeVocht decided to double down on Tesla again, and again, and again, loading up on options contracts, and it worked. By February 2020, he had C$5.5 million, and in June, his portfolio was worth C$26 million and “rising rapidly.”

In July of that year, he wanted to move out of his rental unit and purchase his own home, and he contacted a representative from RBC’s Private Banking arm to see if he could borrow against his Tesla stock to get a loan to buy a house.

Yes, instead of selling the millions of dollars that he had made on Tesla call options, he wanted to use it as collateral for a home loan.

DeVocht
From DeVocht’s civil claim

After he was approved to become an RBC Private Banking client, DeVocht was given an RBC financial advisor, Chris Delorme. Per the civil claim, DeVocht and RBC signed an agreement stating the following:

“RBC would be paid various fees and commissions from the products and services provided to the plaintiffs as arranged by Mr. Delorme on behalf of RBC. In return, Mr. Delorme would provide Mr. DeVocht with financial planning advice, and in doing so would exercise the care, skill and diligence reasonably expected from a professional advisor in that capacity.”

Among other responsibilities, Delorme’s team would:

  • advise Mr. DeVocht carefully and skillfully in accordance with his risk tolerance and financial objectives;

  • explain to Mr. DeVocht the risks and consequences of any financial planning strategies;

  • recommend only investments and financial planning strategies to Mr. DeVocht that were suitable, having regard to his particular circumstances, investment knowledge, financial objectives, and risk tolerance;

  • advise about and recommend strategies to minimize risks and preserve wealth.

According to the claim, RBC “failed to properly understand and verify” Mr. DeVocht’s level of sophistication in financial matters, which were pretty narrow in scope: he knew how to sling Tesla options, but that was about it.

DeVocht
From DeVocht’s civil claim

RBC also connected DeVocht to accounting firm Grant Thornton, which it appears provided him decent advice for minimizing his taxes: namely, trading through an LLC to cut his capital gains tax rate in half.

DeVocht
From DeVocht’s civil claim

Note in point 20 that according to DeVocht, besides creating an LLC, he was advised to “accumulate as many Tesla shares as possible” and hold them “as long as possible” to help lower his tax liability. So DeVocht did just that: he transferred his securities to DeVocht Corp in October 2020, and he began providing trading instructions to Delorme to execute the trades (for a fee, of course) in December of that year. DeVocht then claimed, in accordance with the tax minimization advice, he accrued “as much Tesla stock as possible through options trading and other transactions” and held it for “as long as possible.”

And for the next 11 months, it worked! By April 2021, his portfolio was worth C$186 million, and in November, it reached C$415 million. I would like to take a step back here so we can imagine what this looks like:

A 30-year-old carpenter from Vancouver approaches the Royal Bank of Canada and says, “I want to buy a house. Can I take a loan against my portfolio?” A representative from RBC’s Private Bank raises an eyebrow as he reviews a portfolio consisting of millions in Tesla call options, before shaking his hand, saying, “Of course!” and setting him up with a financial advisor. A few months later, this carpenter is calling his RBC-appointed financial advisor, instructing him to buy C$75 million in weekly Tesla call options. Of course the advisor complies: it’s the client’s money, after all! And those call options represent trading fees.

Then Tesla tanked, and DeVocht took a C$20 million personal loan from his own LLC to try to “recoup the losses” by trading his personal account, which went about as well as you’d expect:

DeVocht
From DeVocht’s civil claim

This is, without a doubt, my favorite trading story of all time. I remember, in the early days of the pandemic, turning $10,000 into $30,000 trading S&P put options, before quickly roundtripping back to $10,000, but $88,000 to $415 million to “nothing” is god-tier performance. Among the reasons listed in legal basis for his suit, Devocht notes that RBC “failed to recognize Mr. DeVocht’s personal entrenchment and potential addiction to the highs and lows of RBC’s Direct Investing platform, such that he was having significant difficulty withdrawing or de-risking in light of his extraordinary success.”

I would say addiction is an understatement. While he may have lost nine figures, there is a consolation prize: his story managed to garner 6,900 upvotes on Wall Street Bets.

WSB DeVocht
Wall Street Bets post highlighting DeVocht

Capital gains are temporary; Reddit karma is forever.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Broadcom jumps after locking down Google as a customer for future generations of TPUs

Shares of Broadcom rose more than 3% in postmarket trading on Monday after its most important customer doubled down on the custom chip specialist’s ability to produce its most valuable commodity.

In a filing, Broadcom said that it entered into a long-term agreement with Google to supply future generations of TPUs (custom AI accelerator chips) as well as a supply assurance agreement for networking and other equipment “through up to 2031.”

Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon indicated that Broadcom’s investor relations team told him that Google’s long-term agreement “has revenue commitments that go along with it through the timeline.”

Gemini 3 launched to rave reviews in November. The model was trained on TPUs co-developed by Broadcom and Google.

The same Monday filing showed that Broadcom, Google, and Anthropic expanded a partnership that will see the Claude developer access 3.5 gigawatts of AI compute capacity beginning in 2027, powered by the TPUs co-designed by the custom chip specialist and the search giant.

Bernstein’s Rasgon added that Broadcom’s team suggested these 3.5 gigawatts are “only part of a larger partnership over time.” He thinks Broadcom’s fiscal year 2027 guidance for AI revenues of $100 billion “is looking increasingly light” thanks to this news.

For what it’s worth, the enhanced pact with Anthropic hinges upon the firm’s ability to afford AI compute. But based on the insane trajectory of its run-rate revenue that may not be a big hurdle to clear.

“Broadcom’s expanded agreements with Google and Anthropic add rare multi-year visibility, reinforcing a $40-$50 billion AI revenue opportunity tied to Anthropic’s 3.5 gigawatt deployment starting in 2027, while building on the previously disclosed 1GW ($10 billion) starting in 2H,” wrote Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Kunjan Sobhani and Oscar Hernandez Tejada.

markets

Health insurers surge after Medicare agrees to pay 2.48% more in 2027, a bigger-than-expected boost

Health insurance stocks are surging after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said it plans to boost Medicare Advantage and Part D payments by 2.48% in calendar year 2027.

The likes of CVS, Humana, UnitedHealth, Molina Healthcare, Oscar Health, and Elevance Health are gaining in postmarket trading.

Wall Street analysts had anticipated that rates for 2027 would go up between roughly 1% and 1.5%.

These stocks had gotten crushed in late January when the Trump administration proposed relatively flat federal payment rates.

Insurance companies that provide government-sponsored plans, like Medicare Advantage, faced headwinds from higher-than-expected costs in 2025.

markets

Iran war winners Dow, LyondellBasell downgraded by Bank of America

Dow, Inc. and LyondellBasell — two petrochemicals stocks that surged as markets priced in shortages due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz — should decline as investors focus on the long-term outlook for normalized petrochemical prices once the war resolves, Bank of America analysts wrote in a note downgrading the two stocks Monday.

BofA moved its rating on the shares from “neutral” to “underperform,” writing:

“Over time, as chemical markets normalize, we expect 1) investor focus to shiſt back to ‘normal’ or ‘sustainable’ earnings profiles and 2) the conflict to resolve without material asset rationalization, both of which likely bias shares lower over the next twelve months.”

Analysts also lowered their stance on another petrochemicals and building materials stock, Westlake, to “neutral” from “buy.”

While cutting those ratings, BofA actually raised its more near-term price targets for the shares. It upped LyondellBasell to $68 from $55, and Dow to $35 from $31.

But those price targets still imply declines of more than 10% compared to where both shares were trading late Monday morning. Both stocks are up roughly 30% since the start of the Iran war.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.