Markets
Fed Chair Jerome Powell Holds An News Conference On Interest Rates
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

The Fed’s creeping concern about surging US stocks

The central bank does not want to be the key cog in your bull case.

Luke Kawa

The Federal Reserve kept its policy rate unchanged at a range of 5.25-5.5% in its Wednesday decision, while acknowledging that recent inflation data is a step in the right direction.

The central bank now anticipates the policy rate will go down only 25 basis points between now and year-end, compared to the 75 basis points worth of cuts seen in March. But most Fed officials didn’t revise their forecasts following this morning’s surprisingly soft CPI inflation data, according to Chair Jerome Powell. 

US Treasuries pared about half their post-CPI gains, while stocks held on to most of them for another record closing high.

Here are the big takeaways from Wednesday’s updated economic projections and press conference.

Wait and see

Back in January, Powell effectively took a March rate cut off the table by saying it was unlikely that the Federal Reserve would gain sufficient confidence that inflation would trend sustainably towards its target by then. When asked today whether the “modest further progress” the central bank had seen recently on inflation would, if sustained, pave the way for a rate cut in September, he didn’t say yes. But! He didn’t say no, either.

The nothing’s changed economy

The Federal Reserve’s forecasts suggest that at year end, the annual rate of core PCE inflation and the unemployment rate will be exactly the same as they are now. And that would be sufficient to shift the Fed from sitting on its hands to starting to ease policy.

Another way of saying that is the Federal Reserve sees this set of economic conditions as well worth preserving. Even with inflation a little above target, and expected to stay so through 2025, preserving this mix of labor market and inflation outcomes more or less constitutes mission accomplished, in their eyes.

If these outcomes are indeed realized (a big if), that would seem to be very positive for risk assets, in a vacuum. Economic volatility going to zero for half a year is a positive, considering the backdrop we have has proved very conducive to driving profit growth for publicly-traded companies.

Good thing monetary policy is the end-all, be-all for markets, and there isn’t a big event happening in the US between now and year-end that could prompt a major re-evaluation of the outlook for fiscal policy and earnings growth going forward!

Animal spirits a worry

A sharp increase in the stock market, in theory, feeds through into stronger economic growth, which may in turn push inflationary pressures upwards. The Fed is cognizant (if not somewhat worried about) this potential sequence of events.

“When we do start to loosen policy, that will show up in a significant loosening in financial market conditions,” said Powell.

On the contrary: markets can price this in well of the Federal Reserve actually doing anything! Last year, the Fed put the tightening cycle to bed, which led market participants to price the next move from the central bank as a cut. The stock market’s rise during the four-month period from November through March was comparable to what normally happens when the US economy is on the verge of emerging from a recession (or some particularly explosive parts of the dot-com bubble).

The Fed wants rate cuts to stabilize an economy that’s cooling, not spark a mini-boom. Or, in other words, the Fed wants stocks to go up on sustaining earnings growth around this level, not an acceleration in profit growth or multiple expansion. The Federal Reserve does not want to be the key cog in your bull case for stocks.

Besides through the portfolio management subcomponent of inflation, it’s not too obvious that there are channels through which this surge in the stock market caused higher inflation outturns in 2024. What we heard today seems to be a tinge of concern from the Fed over how buoyant financial markets might impede its ability to accomplish its goals over time. This may influence the timing and amount of any rate cuts delivered in the future.

Bifurcation

Monetary policymakers at the Fed are split into two major camps:

There are seven officials who think that one 25 basis point rate cut would be appropriate this year if the economy evolves as they anticipate, and eight looking for 50 basis points of easing (and then four relative outliers expecting no change).

Policymakers are all basically looking for nearly the same data, give a tenth of a percentage point here or there: The ranges of forecasts for end-2024 inflation and the unemployment are narrower than in March (granted, one would expect this to compress as the year progresses).

During the press conference, Powell said that many officials saw it as a very close call between one versus two cuts. So either there are very fine margins on what data is needed to get one cut versus two, or officials are divided on how they’d react to exactly the same data. Probably a mix of both is at play here.

No big rethink

Inflation re-accelerated in Q1. Economic growth and job growth are solid. Corporate America’s putting up big numbers, and credit spreads are near historically tight levels. All of that has led people to wonder if US policy rates above 5% are really putting that much downward pressure on the economy and interest rates.

The Federal Reserve doesn’t appear to have changed its thoughts on what constitutes restrictive policy.

If you deflate the Federal Reserve’s dot plot of projected policy rates by their corresponding core PCE inflation forecasts to arrive at the inflation-adjusted or “real” policy rate, the numbers are pretty much the same as they were in March. Inflation has run a little hotter than expected, so rates will stay a little higher for longer. There’s no dramatic rethink of what the Fed thinks it needs to do to attain its dual mandate of price stability and full employment.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Ford raises its full-year guidance, receives $1.3 billion tariff refund

Ford reported its first-quarter results after markets closed on Wednesday. The automaker’s shares climbed roughly 7% in after-hours trading on the news.

For Q1, Ford reported:

  • Adjusted earnings of $0.66 per share, compared to the $0.18 per share expected by Wall Street analysts polled by FactSet. The figure includes Ford’s tariff reimbursement.

  • $43.25 in total revenue, vs. the $42.66 billion consensus forecast. Automotive revenue came in at $39.8 billion, compared to estimates of $38.9 billion.

  • A $1.3 billion tariff refund.

Ford boosted its full-year guidance for adjusted earnings before interest and taxes to between $8.5 billion and $10.5 billion, up from between $8 billion and $10 billion.

Late last year, Ford announced it would take $19.5 billion in charges — one of the largest write-downs ever — relating mostly to its EV business. Of those charges, $7 billion will be spread across this year and next, the company said.

Earlier this month, Ford recorded an 8.8% drop in Q1 sales from the same period last year, a similar result to Detroit rival GM, which posted a 9.7% sales drop.

markets

Microsoft beats on revenue and earnings in Q3, but only meets expectations for cloud growth

Microsoft shares dipped after the company reported strong Q3 earnings postmarket Wednesday, posting ​​sales of $82.9 billion for the quarter, beating FactSet analyst estimates of $81.4 billion. Earnings per share were $4.27, handily beating estimates of $4.05. 

In a closely watched number, Microsoft’s Azure cloud business increased 40% year on year, just above the 39.7% estimated. The metric technically beat expectations, but may not be the beat investors were looking for.

Total capital expenditure for the quarter was $31.9 billion, up 49% year on year, above estimates of $27.5 billion and down from Q2’s $37.5 billion.

One thing investors were eager to find out: how is the company doing in its effort to fulfill the billions in backlogged commercial bookings? Last quarter, the company reported a staggering $625 billion in remaining performance obligations, and 45% of that was for just one customer — OpenAI.

For the third quarter, Microsoft reported a backlog of $627 billion, up 99% year on year. The company said the RPO increase was 26% — in line with “historical seasonality” — when excluding OpenAI.

Breaking down the results by the company’s business lines:

  • ☁️ 🤖 Intelligent Cloud (Azure, server products): $34.7 billion in revenue, up 30% year on year.

  • 📝 📊 Productivity and Business Processes (Microsoft 365, LinkedIn, Dynamics): $35 billion in revenue, up 17% year on year.

  • 💻 🎮 More Personal Computing (Windows, Xbox, Bing): $13.2 billion in revenue, down 1% year on year.

Microsoft CFO Amy Hood said in the earnings release:

“We delivered results that exceeded expectations across revenue, operating income, and earnings per share, reflecting strong execution and growing demand for the Microsoft Cloud.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.