Markets
US-ECONOMY-FEDERAL RESERVE-POWELL
US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell (Kamil Krzaczynski/Getty Images)

Federal Reserve lowers policy rate by 25 basis points, dot plot signals 25 basis points in cuts for 2026

The Federal Reserve lowered its policy rate by 25 basis points to a range of 3.5% to 3.75% in its final scheduled meeting of 2025.

Luke Kawa

The Federal Reserve lowered its policy rate by 25 basis points to a range of 3.5% to 3.75% in its final scheduled meeting of 2025. The move was nearly universally expected by both economists and prediction markets.

“The Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate and judges that downside risks to employment rose in recent months,” per the statement accompanying the decision.

The central bank also inserted the bolded words (emphasis added by us) into this sentence that had appeared in the previous statement, to nod at the idea that policymakers aren’t in a hurry to cut rates going forward: “In considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks.”

During the press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the language indicated that the central bank is well positioned to wait and see how the economy evolves before taking any additional action.

The SPDR S&P 500 ETF was modestly lower before 2 p.m. ET, and rose as much as 0.4% before Powell’s press conference started. Stocks rose to session highs as he fielded questions from the press, with the SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF performing particularly well.

The chair suggested that the labor market has probably been a little softer than headline job creation numbers suggest. Payroll growth is averaging about 40,000 per month since April, which is likely overstated by 60,000, Powell said. Tariffs are the biggest reason why inflation remains well above the central bank’s target, per Powell, and the labor market does not appear to be strong enough to be a catalyst for an acceleration in price pressures.

The central bank’s updated Summary of Economic Projections shows that the median policymaker anticipates it will be appropriate for the policy rate to go down to 3.375%, or another 25 basis points, by the end of 2026. That’s the same as the “dot plot” from mid-September, and in line with the consensus estimate from economists polled by Bloomberg.

There is high dispersion among Fed officials’ outlooks. Powell also reassured markets that despite what some members indicated on the dot plot, rates are still more likely to go down from here than up.

“I don’t think that a rate hike is anyone’s base case at this point, and I’m not hearing that,” he said. “When people are writing down their estimates of policy and where it should go, it is either holding here or cutting a little or cutting more than a little.”

Uncertainty over how much the Fed may ease going forward also reflected in event contracts, which had a more dovish tilt heading into this decision compared to the central bank. Event contracts on Kalshi showed the likelihood of 50 basis points or 75 basis points of easing above 20% apiece, with 25 basis points at 13%.

Compared to September, monetary policymakers are much more bullish on economic growth. The GDP growth forecast was upped to 2.3% from 1.8%.

The forecast for the unemployment rate to end 2026 at 4.4% was unchanged versus September, while the core PCE projection was nudged down a tick to 2.5%.

Three officials dissented from today’s decision. Governor Stephen Miran preferred a 50-basis point cut, while Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee and Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid voted for no change to rates.

At the Fed’s last meeting in October, Fed Chair Jerome Powell warned that a reduction at this meeting was “far from” a foregone conclusion. In the interim, a number of Fed officials (especially nonvoting members) expressed skepticism about delivering a rate cut or disagreed with easing already delivered by the US central bank to date in 2025. But the decisive turn in prediction markets occurred when New York Fed President John Williams said in a speech on November 21, “I still see room for a further adjustment in the near term.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

GameStop surges after Michael Burry reveals he owns the stock

Shares of GameStop are surging after Michael Burry, former hedge fund manager of “The Big Short” fame and current Substacker, announced that he’s been buying the video game and collectibles retailer recently.

The revelation came in Burry’s long-anticipated follow-up post on GameStop. The stock initially jumped when Burry tweeted about his history of being long the stock in November, and again in December as he teased a more thorough write-up of the experience.

Per CNBC, Burry wrote in a Substack post on Monday:

“I own GME. I have been buying recently. I expect I am buying at what may soon be 1x tangible book value / 1x net asset value. And getting a young Ryan Cohen investing and deploying the company’s capital and cash flows. Perhaps for the next 50 years.”

Trading volumes in GameStop went parabolic after the news crossed the wires. As of noon ET, 11.9 million shares have changed hands, more than 6x the average by this time of day.

And while Burry said he’s “willing to hold long-term,” his ownership is spurring a big rush into short-term call options on GameStop. As of 12:20 p.m., call volumes are more than double their 20-day moving average. The four most active contracts are calls that expire this Friday with strike prices of $25, $24, $20, and $23.

GameStop is a stock that has traded off of nostalgia, its exposure to things that are cool or entertaining, and leaders with big main character energy. And Burry’s the first injection of main character energy into the shares since Keith Gill, aka Roaring Kitty, came back to spur another meme stock rally in GameStop in the second quarter of 2024 and then disappeared almost as quickly as he’d arrived.

Gill and Burry have a lot in common: both like GameStop because they think it’s cheap and they’re willing to make “a bet on the management, in particular, of course, Ryan fucking Cohen.”

markets

Extreme optimism on global growth is a bad omen for cyclically sensitive trades

By mid-December, it became pretty clear that investors were pricing in an acceleration in global growth for 2026, and price action since then has only calcified that narrative.

“The equity market has rapidly priced a positive expected growth outlook for this year,” Goldman Sachs’ Cullen Morgan wrote. “Similar has been seen in other asset classes as well, leading to our Global Growth Optimism Factor (RAI PC1) hitting a level seen only a handful of times over the last two decades.”

RAI stands for “risk appetite indicator,” the bank’s proprietary metric for investor sentiment.

One problem with all this optimism embedded in asset prices, Morgan noted, is that it can serve as a high-water mark for trades perceived to be sensitive to the ebbs and flows of the economy — in particular, small-caps and cyclicals versus defensives.

Goldman Growth Optimism
Source: Goldman Sachs

“To be clear, we continue to recommend select cyclicals as beneficiaries of the economic acceleration in early 2026 given the market does not yet appear to be fully pricing our economists’ above-consensus growth forecasts, but we are growing wary of a limited runway,” he concluded.

RAI stands for “risk appetite indicator,” the bank’s proprietary metric for investor sentiment.

One problem with all this optimism embedded in asset prices, Morgan noted, is that it can serve as a high-water mark for trades perceived to be sensitive to the ebbs and flows of the economy — in particular, small-caps and cyclicals versus defensives.

Goldman Growth Optimism
Source: Goldman Sachs

“To be clear, we continue to recommend select cyclicals as beneficiaries of the economic acceleration in early 2026 given the market does not yet appear to be fully pricing our economists’ above-consensus growth forecasts, but we are growing wary of a limited runway,” he concluded.

markets

Goldman Sachs: Megacap tech stocks’ relative valuations are near their 2022 lows

With Microsoft and Meta jump-starting the megacap tech reporting period this Wednesday, Goldman Sachs equity derivatives and flows specialist Cullen Morgan commented on a relative rarity for the cohort of behemoths: they’re not really that expensively priced. He wrote:

“Valuations of the mega-cap tech stocks have declined substantially in recent months. The group now trades at a forward P/E of 27x, which ranks in the 59th percentile relative to the past decade. Relative to the rest of the S&P 500, the 31% P/E premium ranks in the 24th percentile during the past 10 years...

While elevated FCF multiples leave room for further de-rating, the current PEG ratio of 1.4x nearly matches the trough from late 2022.”

Goldman Mega Cap Tech Valuations

This is exactly why we suggested keeping an eye on hyperscaler valuations coming into this year, particularly this divergence between price-to-earnings ratios and price-to-free cash flow ratios, as a way to monitor whether profit expectations surrounding the transformative potential of AI were getting extrapolative or not:

“One way to square this circle between elevated, not crazy forward valuations based on one metric and sky-high ones based on another is to conclude that the lack of runaway forward price-to-earnings ratios suggests that the market does continue to have some skepticism about the long-term earnings power associated with all these capital outlays.

Less doubt would equal higher valuations and higher stock prices. No doubt and unbridled optimism about how much these first movers in AI will reap rewards for years if not decades to come… that’s how we really get a bubble.”

So far in 2026, the market has been squarely focused on rewarding companies that are poised to benefit from near-term shortages and excess profit opportunities brought about by the AI boom, rather than its potential long-term winners. We’ll see if that changes as megacap tech leaders start to step up to the plate this week.

markets

Booz Allen Hamilton dives after Treasury Department cancels contracts over leak

Large defense-centric government consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton dove Monday after the US Treasury Department announced it was canceling all its contracts with the firm, citing a former employee who pleaded guilty to leaking tax information about President Donald Trump and thousands of the country’s richest people to media outlets like The New York Times and Propublica between 2018 and 2020.

The man, Charles Edward Littlejohn, was sentenced to five years in prison in January 2024.

The US government accounts for nearly all revenues generated by Booz Allen, with more than 70% coming from defense and intelligence clients as of its most recent earnings report. The remainder comes from civil clients, a division that includes the Treasury.

The Treasury Department said it canceled all 31 contracts it had with the company, which were worth a total of $21 million.

“Booz Allen failed to implement adequate safeguards to protect sensitive data, including the confidential taxpayer information it had access to through its contracts with the Internal Revenue Service,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement.

Just last week, management had raised its annual profit outlook after reporting better-than-expected third-quarter earnings.

The man, Charles Edward Littlejohn, was sentenced to five years in prison in January 2024.

The US government accounts for nearly all revenues generated by Booz Allen, with more than 70% coming from defense and intelligence clients as of its most recent earnings report. The remainder comes from civil clients, a division that includes the Treasury.

The Treasury Department said it canceled all 31 contracts it had with the company, which were worth a total of $21 million.

“Booz Allen failed to implement adequate safeguards to protect sensitive data, including the confidential taxpayer information it had access to through its contracts with the Internal Revenue Service,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement.

Just last week, management had raised its annual profit outlook after reporting better-than-expected third-quarter earnings.

markets

Morgan Stanley jacks up its Sandisk price target

Sandisk climbed early Monday after a hefty target price hike from analysts at Morgan Stanley.

Morgan Stanley semiconductor analysts upped their price target from the significantly under market level $273 (the shares are currently hovering around $473) to $483. Morgan Stanley’s big hike might be the start of a trend, as the velocity of the rally in Sandisk has left Wall Street’s average price target of $394 in the dust. The bank kept its “overweight” rating on the stock, which it first applied in March 2025.

Once primarily known as a stodgy maker of USB thumb drives, Sandisk has seen interest explode over the last year alongside prices for NAND memory chips, which its devices rely on. Sandisk was the best-performing stock in the S&P 500 last year, after it was added to the index in November. The shares are up a remarkable 1,255% over the last 12 months, with most of that gain coming since the beginning of September.

NAND chips have long been considered a relatively cheap and ubiquitous commodity in the world of semiconductors. But prices for NAND chips have surged of late because of voracious demand for AI data centers, especially for “enterprise solid state drives” or eSSDs — bulky data storage devices that use more NAND than other storage products and have gobbled up supply of the chips.

Morgan Stanley analysts wrote:

“NAND fundamentals remain exceptional, driven by the surge in enterprise solid state drives that we highlighted a few months ago (with 2 cloud customers ordering close to 10% of global supply for all of 2025 for 4q delivery); that has meaningfully tightened the consumer markets as well.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.