Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

Fourth-quarter deliveries “immaterial to the majority of the current Tesla bull case,” Barclays argues

Tesla is expected to set a new quarterly record for deliveries when those figures drop early in the new year (on January 2, to be exact).

But with the frenzy surrounding the stock in the wake of Donald Trump’s presidential victory in November, does its operational performance even matter?

Barclays contends that if these numbers disappoint then, no, it doesn’t. From IBD:

“However, the firm [editor’s note: Barclays] believes investor focus on Tesla stock’s fundamentals is generally limited and that a light near-term volume miss ‘would likely do little to dampen’ TSLA’s rally, fueled by President-elect Donald Trump, autonomous vehicle and artificial intelligence.

...Barclays also wrote that Tesla’s Q4 result is likely ‘immaterial to the majority of the current Tesla bull case.’”

“Barclays analysts on Dec. 18 wrote the post-election rally in TSLA shares reflects a ‘sharp disconnect’ between the stock and the company’s fundamentals. The firm wrote that technicals and options are playing an outsized role in the rally and that Tesla shares are now best compared to cryptocurrencies.”

It’s clear, though, that the options market is pricing this as an “event,” whether the fundamentals matter or not. Tesla’s implied two-week volatility (which includes the anticipated announcement on deliveries) is higher than its one-week volatility (whose options are based on this hopefully uneventful holiday week) by about 2.5 points. In other words, traders are bracing for a bigger move next week versus this week. For 2024 as a whole, two-week implied vol has tended to be about 1 point lower than its shorter-term counterpart.

How fierce has the postelection rally in Tesla been? Well, 28 analysts rank the stock a buy, according to Bloomberg, compared to 16 who say hold and another 16 that say sell. But the average 12-month target price is just $295 — that is, more than 30% below its current price, with only six having a price target above where it’s trading now.

But with the frenzy surrounding the stock in the wake of Donald Trump’s presidential victory in November, does its operational performance even matter?

Barclays contends that if these numbers disappoint then, no, it doesn’t. From IBD:

“However, the firm [editor’s note: Barclays] believes investor focus on Tesla stock’s fundamentals is generally limited and that a light near-term volume miss ‘would likely do little to dampen’ TSLA’s rally, fueled by President-elect Donald Trump, autonomous vehicle and artificial intelligence.

...Barclays also wrote that Tesla’s Q4 result is likely ‘immaterial to the majority of the current Tesla bull case.’”

“Barclays analysts on Dec. 18 wrote the post-election rally in TSLA shares reflects a ‘sharp disconnect’ between the stock and the company’s fundamentals. The firm wrote that technicals and options are playing an outsized role in the rally and that Tesla shares are now best compared to cryptocurrencies.”

It’s clear, though, that the options market is pricing this as an “event,” whether the fundamentals matter or not. Tesla’s implied two-week volatility (which includes the anticipated announcement on deliveries) is higher than its one-week volatility (whose options are based on this hopefully uneventful holiday week) by about 2.5 points. In other words, traders are bracing for a bigger move next week versus this week. For 2024 as a whole, two-week implied vol has tended to be about 1 point lower than its shorter-term counterpart.

How fierce has the postelection rally in Tesla been? Well, 28 analysts rank the stock a buy, according to Bloomberg, compared to 16 who say hold and another 16 that say sell. But the average 12-month target price is just $295 — that is, more than 30% below its current price, with only six having a price target above where it’s trading now.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.