Markets
Man's Head and Arrows
(Getty Images)

Managing futures risk: Understanding how much you stand to make or lose

The leverage futures offer can cut both ways.

Toby Bochan

Welcome to Sherwood’s deep dive into futures markets, presented in partnership with CME Logo


In this guide, we’ll help you understand how to manage futures risk. While we’ve previously discussed leverage as one of the benefits of trading futures, it’s important to remember that leverage is a double-edged sword. When things go your way, futures can seem like a money multiplier, but when the market moves in the opposite direction of your futures trade, you stand to lose even more. And the bigger the swing, the bigger the risk.

We hope it all goes the right way every time, but the best way to approach risk management with futures is not to ask, “How much could I profit if all goes as I think it will,” but rather, “How much do I stand to lose if all goes wrong?” 

Fresh takes on financial news

Subscribe and thrive

snacks logo

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Let’s look at how things could go after you’ve decided to buy that first futures contract. We’ll stick with the previous oil example, which has once again become quite topical. You believe oil is cheap and is about to soar due to geopolitical tensions, so you buy one crude oil futures contract for $60, add $6,000 to your account for the margin requirement, and wait for that liquid gold to work its magic.

The first day, the price goes up $0.10. The tick size for crude oil is 0.01, so it’s gone up 10 ticks, increasing your contract’s notional value to $60,100 — a nice $100 growth in your position. You can see how futures really magnify gains: $0.10 becomes $100! 

The next day, OPEC+ announces it’s massively outperformed with oil production, and the price of oil sinks to $55. Yikes! That’s 600 ticks down, or a loss of $6,000 from the notional value from the previous day. So you see how movements are magnified both for the upside as well as the downside.

Depending on the margin requirements — some brokerages call for a different amount for “maintenance margin” rather than opening margin — a trader may have to deposit more into their account at the end of the trading session, which is what’s referred to as a margin call.

My favorite example of how things can go absolutely wrong is from the 1983 movie Trading Places,” in which the Duke brothers trade orange juice futures on insider information (which wasn’t even illegal at the time!), but are tricked into trading on incorrect information planted by Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd’s characters. Because they believe they know the actual future, they place outsized bets that the price of orange juice will soar, without worrying about the consequences of what will happen if there’s a bumper crop. As the actual data is revealed, the price drops from $1.42 to just $0.29, resulting in a margin call of $394 million to cover the monumental difference between their contracts and the current price. The Duke brothers do not have that much cash, so they are bankrupted. If you want to go deeper into the math, this post does a great job of figuring it all out

While what happened to the Dukes in 1983 couldn’t happen in 2025 the same way, it’s still important to employ tactics to manage your risk exposure. 

Some tools to manage risk include:

  • Employing stop-loss orders: Probably the two most important things to set up as you implement your futures strategy are both up and down limit orders for the contract that represent your risk tolerance — for example, a sell order if it hits 10% up or 8% down from your initial position. 

  • Managing your position size: This could be through buying fewer contracts or by buying micro or mini versions of the same underlying commodity. For instance, Micro WTI Crude Oil represents one-tenth the size of a standard WTI Crude Oil contract, so one $60 contract’s notional value is $6,000 instead of $60,000.  

  • Diversification: Just as you wouldn’t put 100% of your stock portfolio in a single equity or even a single sector, your futures portfolio should include different sectors and classes. 

It’s also important to maintain discipline both when you’re winning and on the losing side: it’s easy to get caught up in “streaks” and feel like you’re carried by magic into piles of winning trades that persuade you to throw caution to the wind and make plays outside your usual approach. Similarly, fears of losing money shouldn’t make you exit positions early if you’ve set up a strategy that may still trend in your favor. 

Basically, your decisions shouldn’t stem from fear, greed, or FOMO, and don’t put yourself into a position where you could lose more than you can afford.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

With their recent surge, Intel shares just hit their highest level since the dot-com era

Intel’s surge of nearly 60% this month has the iconic American chipmaker’s stock price approaching levels last seen during the dot-com era. Bloomberg noted that shares just touched their highest intraday level since the turn of the century:

The stock rose as much as 1.5% to $69.55, topping a peak it hit on Jan. 24, 2020. The shares are up 90% this year, after soaring 84% in 2025. Intel is now roughly 8% from its all-time closing high of $74.88, established on Aug. 31, 2000.

That’s just the most recent late-’90s-era throwback we’ve been seeing in tech shares lately. Oracle is currently pacing for its best week since late 1999.

What’s even more remarkable, however, is that Intel’s forward price-to-earnings ratio today dwarfs the premiums the market was putting on the stock during the nuttiness of the dot-com mania.

That reflects the fact that the recent run-up in Intel shares is, essentially, giving the chip giant credit for a massive turnaround that hasn’t actually happened yet.

One also might wonder if the fact that Intel is partially owned by the US government means it’s more attractive — and therefore worth a higher premium — than other chipmakers without the state imprimatur.

Still, kind of startling.

markets

Eli Lilly’s GLP-1 pill hit nearly 1,400 prescriptions in first week

Eli Lilly rose after preliminary numbers cited by Wall Street analysts showed strong uptake of its new weight-loss pill.

The FDA approved Foundayo on April 1 and shipments began on April 9. In its first week, roughly 1,400 US prescriptions were written for the drug, according to IQVIA data cited by Deustche Bank analysts in a Friday note.

Novo Nordisk, Lilly’s rival in the GLP-1 market, released its GLP-1 pill earlier this year, and early signs show that it’s expanding the market, inviting patients who were turned off by weekly injections. Novo’s pill had a stronger first week than Lilly’s, with its Wegovy pill hitting 3,071 US prescriptions in the first four days after its launch on January 5.

Lilly’s pill has an advantage over Novo’s, which is that it can be taken at any time of day, with or without food. Lilly disclosed in a February regulatory filing that it had $1.5 billion worth of prelaunch inventory ready ahead of the FDA approval — which is about as much as analysts polled by FactSet expect it to sell this year.

Novo Nordisk, Lilly’s rival in the GLP-1 market, released its GLP-1 pill earlier this year, and early signs show that it’s expanding the market, inviting patients who were turned off by weekly injections. Novo’s pill had a stronger first week than Lilly’s, with its Wegovy pill hitting 3,071 US prescriptions in the first four days after its launch on January 5.

Lilly’s pill has an advantage over Novo’s, which is that it can be taken at any time of day, with or without food. Lilly disclosed in a February regulatory filing that it had $1.5 billion worth of prelaunch inventory ready ahead of the FDA approval — which is about as much as analysts polled by FactSet expect it to sell this year.

markets

Critical Metals jumps after Greenland’s government approves CRML to take majority control of the Tanbreez mining project

Critical Metals is up more than 25% in premarket trading on Friday after the critical mining company announced that it now owns 92.5% of the Tanbreez rare earth deposit following an approval from the government of Greenland.

With that latest government support, Critical Minerals added an additional 50.5% stake to its ownership, reportedly acquired from Rimbal Pty Ltd, per Bloomberg News. With access to eight heavy rare earth elements often used in consumer electronics and defense, the site is one of the world’s largest undeveloped rare earth deposits and a key source of rare earth supply outside of China, according to the company.

In Critical Metals’ press release, Chairman Tony Sage commented that the approval “removes the most significant structural overhang on the project and provides the clarity to advance Tanbreez to production with confidence,” especially as Tanbreez’s location offers a significant logistical advantage through its year-round direct shipping access, compared to rival projects.

With 92.5% of the project now vested in Critical Metals Corp., and the remainder owned by European Lithium Ltd., CRML now has full control of the project and is seeking to accelerate development there, with plans for a new international airport and a 150-tonne bulk sample program, which is slated for June 2026.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.